On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 03:20:31PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
[...]
> NOTE: On x86-64, we found at least one corner case [7] with Clang where
> a RELEASE exchange is optimized to a RELEASE store, when the returned
> value of the exchange is unused, breaking the above expectations.
> Although this type of optimization respect the standard "as-if"
> statement, we question its pertinence since a user should simply do a
> RELEASE store instead of an exchange in that case. With the
> introduction of these new primitives, these type of optimizations should
> be revisited.
>
FWIW, this is actually a LLVM bug:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60418
Regards,
Boqun
