onment variable
VTV_LOGS_DIR that has been defined. If that variable exists, then the
log files are written there; otherwise they go into the current
working directory.
Let me know if you have any other questions, and thank you for doing this!
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just created a new branch, based on the google/gcc-4_7-mobile
> branch, for migrating the vtable verification feature from gcc 4.6.3
> (on the google/gcc-4_6-mobile-vtable-security branch) to gcc 4.7. The
maintaining the branch. I have already started submitting
the vtable verification feature patches (hopefully to go into GCC 4.9
when it opens) and will continue both working on it in the branch, and
reconciling the work there with the ToT/patches..
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
I should have mentioned sooner, but thanks, that fixed my problem!
-- Caroline
cmt...@google.com
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I did have to edit the Makefile.in slightly. Whe
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Caroline Tice wrote:
>> > Ian Tayler (in private communication) asked that I get the part of the
>> > build log t
Ian Tayler (in private communication) asked that I get the part of the
build log that shows the .so and .a files being built and send it to
the list. Here it is.
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX --tag disable-shared --mode=compile
/usr/local/google2/cmtice/gcc
command that builds & links libstdc++.so.* (yes
I've looked at the build; it's being built with libtool somewhere,
somehow, and no matter where/how I specify the link flag to link in my
new library, the libtool link command is not picking it up).
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
going
wrong or where/how to fix this? Help, please??
-- Caroline TIce
cmt...@google.com
to be able to merge them into the mainline compiler.
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
On Apr 18, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Hi Caroline,
You've made this change to assemble_start_function (unidiff format):
+ last_text_section = no_section;
+ in_section = no_section;
resolve_unique_section (decl, 0, flag_function_sections);
+
+ /* Switch to the correct text sect
The patch for this has already been submitted to gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg01240.html
-- Caroline Tice
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:04 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have been using this crutch for the last couple of days to be
able to get mainline to
The patch has just been submitted to gcc-patches for
approval (the tests are nearly done and appear to
be passing so far).
-- Caroline
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 11, 2005, at 10:12 PM, Kazu Hirata wrote:
Hi,
I have been getting bootstrap failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu since
Caroline's patch
http://g
r the hot/cold partitioning
optimization into FSF mainline. But I am open to persuasion, and if
the FSF community in general
feels that I really ought to add the size test as well at this time, I
will do so.
What do other people think?
-- Caroline Tice
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 28, 2005, at 12
13 matches
Mail list logo
