On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 15:24, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
Should this be added to the GCC 4.7 release notes at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html ? If you need help doing
so, propose a text and I'll be happy to care of it.
I absolutely need help (just ask Diego)... but not
this time!)
Also built my special cross configuration, that worked as expected.
OK for trunk?
chris
---
[gcc/ChangeLog]
2011-06-25 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* cppdefault.h (cpp_TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT): New variable.
(cpp_TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT_len): Likewise
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 07:28, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
It seems to me that what's really wanted here is to change the add_sysroot
flag for the C++ path (all of the C++ paths?), rather than adding special
code to detect paths starting with the sysroot and reinterpret them.
[resending plain text. Sorry for the noise.]
[sorry, i got stuck doing a bunch of other things.]
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:05, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Chris Demetriou c...@google.com wrote:
In theory, a more general warning-text-addition
.)
thanks,
chris
-
[gcc/ChangeLog.google-4_6]
2011-06-09 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
Backport from google/main r174890:
2011-06-09 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* doc/install.texi (--with-warn-frame-larger-than-extra-text): New.
* configure.ac (--with-warn
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:19, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason why this cannot be an option that someone passes on
the command line of GCC instead of a configure option?
I don't think we ever considered that approach.
That's actually a great idea, I think better for our
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:39, Chris Demetriou c...@google.com wrote:
It is also OK if you s/__i686/__x86/ to correspond to your earlier
change. Either way is OK.
Well, that change is not in trunk.
Should that change move to trunk, yes, it's appropriate to change this
as well (though
Diego,
Testing w/ ubuntu lucid native bootstrap + check (C/C++), with --with-pic
and numerous other flags, looking good.
OK for google/main (assuming tests succeed)?
chris
--
[libgcc/ChangeLog.google-main]
2011-05-04 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
Backport from trunk r173391
as normal, and also --with-pic.
No regressions before/after.
Ian, OK for trunk?
chris
[libgcc/ChangeLog]
2011-05-03 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* libgcc/config/i386/morestack.S (__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx): New.
[libgcc/ChangeLog]
2011-05-03 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* libgcc
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:05, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
2011-05-03 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* libgcc/config/i386/morestack.S (__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx): New.
No libgcc in libgcc/ChangeLog.
Fixed, sorry. (That's what I get for pasting from svn status output
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:49, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Chris Demetriou c...@google.com wrote:
Makes -S output more easily preprocessable -- otherwise, the __i686 in
__i686.get_pc_think.reg chokes things.
IIRC the reason why it uses __i686
/ChangeLog.google-main]
2011-04-30 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* config/i386/i386.c (get_pc_thunk_name): Make 32-bit
thunk prefix be __x86.get_pc_thunk.
[gcc/ChangeLog.google-main]
2011-04-30 Chris Demetriou c...@google.com
* config/i386/i386.c (get_pc_thunk_name): Make 32
12 matches
Mail list logo
