in
stage 2. I've done this with clang manual bootstraps, for example.
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
Quoting David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu:
Apart from parallelism, I wished the stage 2,3 compilations had a hook
for ccache-ing
Even better would be distcc, i.e. distribute the new compilers
around a cluster so you don't need to have all your cores and DIMMS
on the same motherboard to harness
particularly interested in a darwin port, but would benefit from
having it work on any modern platform.)
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
it meaningful?
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
files to the PPL 0.11 release directory.
Please let us know if you have further problems.
Cheers,
Roberto
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
for darwin8 to
safely do that.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
.
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
-libstdc++ libraries and data structures?
iostreams, for example, uses multiple inheritance (even multiple virtual
inheritance), should that be sufficient grounds for forbidding use of
iostreams?
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
--host=powerpc-apple-darwin8
--target=powerpc-apple-darwin8
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5370)
Apple Computer, Inc. version cctools-622.9~2, GNU assembler version 1.38
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
into an email
that you author by hand.
Also, the end of the generated script attempts to move a bunch of files in
the test area, so if you ship the script to another machine, you can skip
that part.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
++ changes came from 3.4 and 4.0.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
. This is why you hit the inaccessible assignment
error.
HTH,
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
, including ios_base. This is more an issue of mis-using the
standard ostream class.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
similar in say one of the optimisation passes
so i can get a look at how to get started on this?
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
=11764
Still accepts-invalid with g++-4.3.2.
compiles with out errors in g++. The result is as if f is declared with
F f;
This is the case with the stock/latest GCC in Debian GNU/Linux x86_64
(v.4.1.2) and in Cygwin (v.3.4.4).
Is this the intended behavior?
No. :)
Fang
David Fang
in email afterward, so that
mechanism will also be available to lurkers.
Is there a chance of any sort of streaming audio broadcast instead of
having to dial in?
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang
on your
error-marked lines for a long time)
Try the following for kicks:
typedef signed int sint;
typedef unsigned intuint;
typedef const int cint;
typedef const sint csint;
typedef const uint cuint;
and replace them where you use ctor style initializations.
David Fang
I still think that is too strong a position. A good fraction
of compiler time is spent bugging out user code.. one could
even say the job of a compiler is not generating machine code,
but telling programmers they're idiots :)
Every compiler version I've tried has been telling me this for years.
On 6/16/07, michael.a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for placement new, from what I can find, it is unsafe to use with any
memory that isn't part of the heap.
Huh? It can be used with stack variables, we have tests in the
testsuite where we use it with such.
As for the discussion of
tradition) if I must. It bothers me though to think that
no one has charted this territory before.
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
Dozens, literally, just browse the bug database. If you want to help, pick
one of them and try to fix it.
How?
I can not browse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ because has not the
'browse' button.
Ah, the joys of bugzilla.
For 4.1 issues, you can go to GCC's front page and under Previous
I think it's worth raising the minimum required version from 2.5.4 to
2.5.31.
I want to point out that Fedora Core 5 appears to still ship flex
2.5.4. At least, that is what flex --version reports. (I didn't
bother to check this before.) I think we need a very strong reason to
Are 4.0 snapshots still necessary? I suspect they should be
discontinued.
4.0 still seems to be regarded as an active branch.
I don't mind closing it, myself. Does anybody think we should have a
4.0.4 release?
I'd like to see it closed. We have some bugs that are
call to the pure virtual function?
Is this behaviour a cause of the C++ standard or is it specific to GCC?
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
There might be a subtle issue with ccache assuming that the compiler
that created a cache-hit object did not change. I'm only aware of
ccache verifying compiler versions (string compare) in the
hit-check, which alone doesn't suffice to guarantee that the cache
is (or should be) hit.
Hi,
My question is: how to build gcc bootstrap with distcc correctly.
I believe it is impossible in the general case. bootstrap means to
compile GCC source code with a GCC compiler just built from the same
source code. Hence, to distribute this compilation with distcc, you'll
need to
Reported (and confirmed) here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=29879
SVN revision: 118945
Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
/home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./g
cc/ -B/home/daniel/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-svn//i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/dan
I made some suggestions on the Wiki
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
Again, feel free to edit the above page (and/or incorporate parts of
it into the documentation).
Looks like it was relocated to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configuration
Fang
I am not sure to understand what is the *reliable* way to regenerate
GCC configure files from the real (human typed) master source files
(like Makefile.in, gcc/configure.ac, Makefile.tpl, etc...)
I made some suggestions on the Wiki
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
Again,
I noticed that the automake maintainers accepted your patch for
fixing the multilib issues in automake. However they also seemed to
indicate that there would be no more 1.9.x automake releases.
Is the r117741 svn checkin related to this issue? I ask because it
was unclear to me how the
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:21 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
i386-unknown-freebsd
The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
secondary from primary.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
I've got an i386 FreeBSD
Bradley Lucier writes:
Brad 4.2 hasn't bootstrapped on powerpc-apple-darwin G5 machine for a very
Brad long time. I'm seeing the same problem as
Brad http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27121
Brad It would be nice if this were remedied. I do try to test gcc
Brad versions before
Hi,
I tried to add myself to the CC list of a PR (27397), but get the
following error message:
You tried to change the Keywords field from ice-on-invalid-code,
error-recovery, monitored to error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code,
monitored, but only the assignee or reporter of the bug, or a
Hi,
Since 3.4, (template-)dependent lookup has been changed to conform
to the standard. In particular, from http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html:
In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members
of a dependent base.
This allows lookups to be bound at template
Hi,
Didn't see a reply yet, so I'll chime in.
The relevant text appears in gcc-3.4's release notes:
When binding an rvalue of class type to a reference, the copy constructor
of the class must be accessible.
PR 12226 seems to be the mother bug related to this (many dupes).
Fang
foo.cc:
. The keyword 'ALL' is kind of important.
David Fang
'
make: *** [check-target-boehm-gc] Error 2
make: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
Does anybody know what went wrong, please?
Cheers,
Michal.
--- end reference message
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell
37 matches
Mail list logo
