is OK then (preferably merging as much as possible with
ipa-split)
Honza
Here is a refactored version with common code moved to tree-chkp.c.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-04-07 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov
2015-04-03 20:09 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
That is the reason for fixing chains in privatize_symbol_name.
OK, so with your proposed patch you produce the links during lto-stream-in
but because the links may be wrong due to multiple different symbol sharing
same
assembler name
2015-04-03 21:49 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Assembler name of instrumented function is a transparent alias of
original function's name. Alias chains are not taken into account by
analysis. Thus we see no conflict between instrumented function's name
and a variable name but emit
On 05 Apr 19:44, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 04/03/2015 01:34 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
+library. It also passes '-z bndplt' to a linker in case it supports this
+option (which is checked on libmpx configuration). Note that old versions
+of linker
2015-04-06 18:28 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 04/06/2015 09:17 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
To tell the truth, I can't figure out what this means from a user
perspective. How does a user know whether the linker option is
being ignored, or if they have a new enough linker
2015-04-03 20:12 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Currently ipa_comdats doesn't set comdat groups for thunks. At the
I see, that is a bug. It is supposed to keep thunks in the same section
as their target (thunks doesn't really work across sections on some target,
like PPC, because
2015-04-02 20:01 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Ping
It would help if you add hubi...@ucw.cz to CC for IPA related patches.
2015-03-19 11:34 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 12 Mar 13:27, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Currently cgraph merge has several issues
2015-04-02 23:55 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Ping
2015-03-10 13:12 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
Currentl we loose returned bounds when functions are merged. This patch
fixes it by adding returne bounds support for cgraph_node::expand_thunk
reference local symbol in comdat not being in comdat by itself. This patch
fixes the problem. Doesn't affect not instrumented code. Testing is in
progress. Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* ipa-comdats.c (ipa_comdats): Visit
2015-04-02 22:42 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 04/02/2015 08:49 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Ping
2015-03-10 13:12 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
Currentl we loose returned bounds when functions are merged. This patch
fixes it by adding returne bounds support
2015-04-02 21:48 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On 03/20/2015 02:20 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Identifiers read with input_identifier miss IDENTIFIER_TRANSPARENT_ALIAS
bit. We always expect it for instrumentation clones, thus restore it
input_cgraph_1. Bootstrapped and tested
2015-04-03 0:13 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On 04/02/2015 02:11 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
2015-03-18 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::expand_thunk): Don't expand
instrumentation thunks.
diff --git a/gcc/cgraphunit.c b/gcc
/
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* ipa.c (ipa_cdtor_merge): Skip instrumentation thunks.
So the problem here is that you do have two names for the function, one that
is not instrumented and other that is instrumented? I am bit surprised we get
instrumentation
2015-03-31 15:32 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2015-03-29 18:43 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
+static bool
+set_single_call_flag (cgraph_node *node, void *)
+{
+ cgraph_edge *cs = node-callers;
+ /* Local thunks can be handled transparently, skip them
/
2015-04-03 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_find_const_bounds_var): Search
by assembler name.
(chkp_make_static_const_bounds): Use make_decl_one_only.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-04-03 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* gcc.dg/lto/chkp
?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* tree-chkp.c (CHKP_LTO_SYMBOL_SUFFIX): New.
(chkp_make_static_const_bounds): Use another
symbol in LTO.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* gcc.dg/lto/chkp
] function_decl
0x7fb609bf7ca8 test1.chkp) [0 test1.chkp S1 A8])
(const_int 0 [0]))) complex.c:11 670 {*call_value}
Only MPX target is affected. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
. This patch
fixes the problem. Doesn't affect not instrumented code. Testing is in
progress. Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* ipa-comdats.c (ipa_comdats): Visit all instrumentation
thunks to set proper comdat group
Hi,
This patch doesn't allow instrumentation thunks calls while merging
constructors and destructors. Not isntrumented code is not affeceted.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-04-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
Ping
2015-03-10 13:12 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
Currentl we loose returned bounds when functions are merged. This patch
fixes it by adding returne bounds support for cgraph_node::expand_thunk.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk
Ping
2015-03-19 11:34 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 12 Mar 13:27, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Currently cgraph merge has several issues with instrumented code:
- original function node may be removed = no assembler name conflict is
detected between function and variable
Ping. Patch doesn't affect not instrumented code.
Thanks,
Ilya
2015-03-18 15:19 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
This patch disables attempts to expand instrumentation thunks which appear
when we create specialized function versions. Problem was found during
SPEC2006
Ping. This patch doesn't affect not instrumented code.
Thanks,
Ilya
2015-03-20 11:20 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
Identifiers read with input_identifier miss IDENTIFIER_TRANSPARENT_ALIAS bit.
We always expect it for instrumentation clones, thus restore
On 24 Mar 15:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:22:27PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-03-24 11:33 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
+ /* We might propagate instrumented function pointer
2015-03-30 23:30 GMT+03:00 Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de:
I originally reported the bug and did test the patch over the weekend:
the Solaris/x86 testsuite failures are gone, so that part is fine. I
couldn't of course test the alloca - __builtin_alloca change since the
tests aren't
2015-03-30 20:20 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
On 30 Mar 14:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-03-27 18:23 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Index: symtab.c
===
--- symtab.c(revision 221734)
+++ symtab.c
On 23 Mar 13:19, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
May this patch go into trunk at this point? It is very important for
dynamic MPX codes.
Thanks,
Ilya
I additionally documented changes in invoke.texi. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-31 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
2015-03-29 18:43 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Hi,
this patch improve crafty performance by avoiding ipa-cp clonning of
Search function that specializes the first iteration of the recursion.
The patch is by Martin, I only tested it and cleaned up code in count_callers
and
2015-03-27 18:23 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Hi,
this patch fixes bug in symtab_node::verify_symtab_nodes pointed out by Ilya.
The loop checking that there all comdats are linked by same_comdat_group was
completely bogus. In addition it checked also external symbols that are
2015-03-27 18:23 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Hi,
this patch fixes bug in symtab_node::verify_symtab_nodes pointed out by Ilya.
The loop checking that there all comdats are linked by same_comdat_group was
completely bogus. In addition it checked also external symbols that are
with
__builtin_alloca calls. Have no machine to test it though (Linux testing is
OK). Any help with testing? Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-30 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65602
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/alloca-1-lbv.c (mpx_test): Use
On 30 Mar 14:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-03-27 18:23 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Index: symtab.c
===
--- symtab.c(revision 221734)
+++ symtab.c(working copy)
@@ -1130,15 +1130,20 @@ symtab_node
2015-03-27 13:13 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This patch avoids various ICEs due to -fcheck-pointer-bounds used for not
supported languages. All options get the same languages list
Hi,
This patch avoids various ICEs due to -fcheck-pointer-bounds used for not
supported languages. All options get the same languages list. Bootstrapped
and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-27 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR
2015-03-24 17:06 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:22:27PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-03-24 11:33 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
+ /* We might propagate instrumented function
2015-03-24 17:40 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:22:27PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
The question is what you want to do in the LTO case for the different cases
2015-03-25 11:16 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:05:17AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
The question is what you want to do in the LTO case for the different
cases,
in particular a TU compiled with -fcheck-pointer-bounds and LTO link
without
2015-03-25 12:50 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:38:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
--- gcc/passes.c(revision 221633)
+++ gcc/passes.c(working copy)
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ void
pass_manager::execute_early_local_passes ()
{
2015-03-25 13:15 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:38:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
--- gcc/passes.c(revision 221633)
+++ gcc/passes.c(working copy)
@@
Hi,
This patch fixes PR target/65508 by proper copy of static chain for
instrumented calls. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK
for trunk or wait for stage 1?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-25 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65508
* tree
2015-03-24 11:33 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
+ /* We might propagate instrumented function pointer into
+ not instrumented function and vice versa. In such a
+ case we need to either fix function declaration
Hi,
May this patch go into trunk at this point? It is very important for
dynamic MPX codes.
Thanks,
Ilya
2015-03-18 14:56 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR target/65444 by passing '-z bndplt' to linker when
appropriate. Bootstrapped and tested
Hi,
Identifiers read with input_identifier miss IDENTIFIER_TRANSPARENT_ALIAS bit.
We always expect it for instrumentation clones, thus restore it input_cgraph_1.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-20 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov
On 12 Mar 13:09, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Instrumented function pointer may be propagated into not instrumented
indirect call and vice versa. It requires additional call modifications
(either remove bounds or change callee). Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK
-gnu. Will apply
after prerequisite patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00992.html) is applied.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-19 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* ipa-chkp.c (chkp_maybe_create_clone): Create alias
reference when cloning alias node.
gcc
On 12 Mar 13:27, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Currently cgraph merge has several issues with instrumented code:
- original function node may be removed = no assembler name conflict is
detected between function and variable
- only orig_decl name is privatized for instrumented function = node
Hi,
When thunk is cloned, its callee is temporarily set to original thunks's target
which is later also cloned. Thus we should be more careful when clonning
node's thunks. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied
to trunk.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-19 Ilya Enkovich
2015-03-18 15:42 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:25 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-03-18 15:08 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015
2015-03-18 16:31 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-18 15:42 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:25 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015
-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-18 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::expand_thunk): Don't expand
instrumentation thunks.
diff --git a/gcc/cgraphunit.c b/gcc/cgraphunit.c
index e640907..abc9cfe 100644
--- a/gcc/cgraphunit.c
+++ b
2015-03-18 15:02 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR target/65444 by passing '-z bndplt' to linker when
appropriate. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Will
commit
2015-03-18 15:08 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-18 15:02 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes PR
Hi,
This patch fixes PR target/65444 by passing '-z bndplt' to linker when
appropriate. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Will commit
it to trunk in a couple of days if no objections arise.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-18 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
2015-03-18 16:52 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-18 16:31 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-03-18 15:42 GMT+03:00
2015-03-18 17:42 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, I agree, the configure check is a reasonable thing to do.
We should either always pass -z
2015-03-18 20:14 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-03-18 19:45 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Instrumented binary
2015-03-18 20:39 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Ilya Enkovich
What is USER? The one who build GCC may not be same
person who uses GCC.
The person who build GCC determines its default behavior. User either
uses it with default settings
2015-03-18 19:45 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-18 17:42 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
MPX is a security feature. Knowing
Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* cgraph.c (cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_to_callee): Add
redirection for instrumented calls.
* tree-chkp.h (chkp_copy_call_skip_bounds): New.
(chkp_redirect_edge): New.
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_copy_call_skip_bounds): New
2015-03-12 12:02 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:51:51AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 09 Mar 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:25:43PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,11
On 09 Mar 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:25:43PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,11 @@ process_options (void)
{
if (targetm.chkp_bound_mode () == VOIDmode)
error (-fcheck-pointer
reachable, privatizing both nodes and fixing chkp references. Bootstrapped and
tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* ipa-chkp.h (chkp_maybe_fix_chkp_ref): New.
* ipa-chkp.c
10 (-97%)
181.mcf 4 0 (-100%)4 2 (-50%)
Do you also have executable sizes at hand?
Summary size change for SPEC2000 on -O2 is -0,11%.
2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65103
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_address_cost
On 11 Mar 19:11, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-03-11 18:59 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
current trunk fails to build on x86*-linux, when configured for x32
multilibs
because libmpx doesn't support these. Disable
2015-03-11 18:59 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
current trunk fails to build on x86*-linux, when configured for x32 multilibs
because libmpx doesn't support these. Disable them.
ok for the trunk?
*
Hi,
Currentl we loose returned bounds when functions are merged. This patch fixes
it by adding returne bounds support for cgraph_node::expand_thunk.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-06 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
On 10 Mar 18:00, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch allows propagation of loop invariants for i386 if propagated value
is a constant to be used in address operand. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk or stage 1?
Thanks,
Ilya
Updated ChangeLog and test
On 10 Mar 16:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:54:46PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
This patches set addresses the problem of inefficient usage of x86
addressing modes in PIC. Looking into generated 32bit PIC assembler we may
see lots of 'leal symbol@GOTOFF, %reg
Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65103
* gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_rtx_costs): We want to propagate
link time constants into adress expressions and therefore set
their cost to 0.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
On 10 Mar 18:11, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch changes rtx cost for address constants to 0 similar to what we
have in address cost hook beacuse we expect them to be propagated into
address expression anyway. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk
.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65103
* gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_address_cost): Fix cost of a PIC
register.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich
Hi,
This patch allows propagation of loop invariants for i386 if propagated value
is a constant to be used in address operand. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk or stage 1?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR
2015-03-02 15:25 GMT+03:00 Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org:
On Mar 2, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Committed to trunk.
Hi Ilya,
Was this approved offline? If so, it is a good habit to note in the
Committed to trunk message who approved
Ping
2015-02-16 20:15 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 16 Feb 17:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:56:45PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 16 Feb 16:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:20:59PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
This patch
Hi,
I've checked in this patch adding new roles for myself.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-02 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* MAINTAINERS (Various Maintainers): Add myself as libmpx,
pointer bounds checker and i386 MPX maintainer.
Index: MAINTAINERS
Committed to trunk.
2015-02-25 17:25 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
Currenly ix86_pass_by_reference may return 1 for bounds if MS ABI is used.
This patch explicitly says bounds are never passed by reference.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK
Committed to trunk.
2015-02-25 12:19 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
This patch fixes a case when outdated checker local data is used to process
external calls. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for
trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-02-25
On 09 Dec 23:56, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-12-09 22:57 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
Wasn't this duplicated in the mpx-wrapper patch?
Wrappers patch introduces similar option static-libmpxwrappers.
I think this is OK on the technical side. I need to do to some vote
tallying
2015-02-26 11:30 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
So the steering committee has agreed to include the MPX runtime in GCC. The
runtime bits are a necessary component to actually make use of the MPX
capabilities.
GCC is a downstream consumer
Hi,
Currenly ix86_pass_by_reference may return 1 for bounds if MS ABI is used.
This patch explicitly says bounds are never passed by reference. Bootstrapped
and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-02-25 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
Hi,
This patch adds support for bounds registers into args recognition mechanism
used by scheduler. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK
for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-02-25 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65167
* gcc/config/i386
2015-02-25 19:16 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
On 02/25/2015 12:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-02-24 19:47 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
Poking around, I see that the -fcheck-pointer-bounds and various -fchkp-*
options are listed in c-family
Hi,
This patch fixes a case when outdated checker local data is used to process
external calls. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for
trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-02-25 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65183
* tree-chkp.c
2015-02-20 19:39 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
On 02/20/2015 01:12 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-02-20 3:48 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
The section Pointer Bounds Checker builtins in extend.texi is on my
list
for being in need of copy-editing
2015-02-24 19:47 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
On 02/24/2015 01:14 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-02-20 19:39 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
On 02/20/2015 01:12 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-02-20 3:48 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san
2015-02-20 3:48 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com:
The section Pointer Bounds Checker builtins in extend.texi is on my list
for being in need of copy-editing, but reading through the existing text, I
am quite confused. In several places it refers to turning the Pointer
Bounds
On 16 Feb 16:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:20:59PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
This patch restricts usage of Pointer Bounds Checker with Sanitizer. OK
for trunk?
There are many sanitizers, and for most of them I don't see why they would
be in any conflict
On 16 Feb 17:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:56:45PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 16 Feb 16:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:20:59PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
This patch restricts usage of Pointer Bounds Checker with Sanitizer.
OK
Hi,
This patch restricts usage of Pointer Bounds Checker with Sanitizer. OK for
trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-02-16 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR target/65044
* toplev.c (process_options): Restrict Pointer Bounds Checker
usage with sanitizers.
gcc
2015-02-15 20:25 GMT+03:00 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* gcc.dg/pr65002.C: New.
This test should have gone into g++.dg.
Into g
2015-02-13 11:54 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* tree-cfg.c (pass_data_fixup_cfg): Don't update
SSA on start
on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* tree-cfg.c (pass_data_fixup_cfg): Don't update
SSA on start.
* tree-sra.c (some_callers_have_no_vuse_p): New
On 27 Jan 12:29, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch
Hi,
This patch fixes two more cases where alias chain should be followed to emit
correct assembler name for instrumented functions. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-01-30 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* varasm.c
the attached patch that exports ix86_use_pseudo_pic_reg.
Uros.
Hello Uros,
Thank you for review! Here is an updated version with proposed changes.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-01-29 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* config
help to avoid problems
in the future.
BTW if we don't want to support possibility to switch to the fixed PIC register
in i386 target then this code may be removed at all.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-01-28 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov
2015-01-27 12:47 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
This disables array-bound warnings from VRP2 as discussed.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu - ok for
Hi,
This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still useful to avoid dead
code generated by complete unroll.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-01-27 Ilya Enkovich
2015-01-27 17:27 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
Hi!
I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being defined.
This patch requires builtins.def to say explicitly (by using
DEF_*BUILTIN_CHKP macro instead of
On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still useful to avoid dead
code generated by complete unroll.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
401 - 500 of 1098 matches
Mail list logo
