[Bug fortran/37794] New: Fortran module overloading regression

2008-10-10 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host

[Bug fortran/37794] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Fortran module overloading regression

2008-10-10 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-10-10 11:38 --- I agree code is invalid Fortran and should be rejected [though it can be made valid quite easily by supplying the missing type]. Works fine on both 4.3 and 4.3.1 on this machine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug fortran/36821] New: Flush denormals to Zero Flag

2008-07-14 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821

[Bug fortran/36821] Flush denormals to Zero Flag

2008-07-14 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-07-14 11:34 --- -ffast-math also enables other (even more unsafe?) optimizations which may not be desirable. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821

[Bug fortran/36153] New: ICE on size with kind parameter

2008-05-06 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown

[Bug fortran/35962] New: Should warn about precision loss on integer conversions in fortran

2008-04-17 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host

[Bug fortran/35962] Should warn about precision loss on integer conversions in fortran

2008-04-17 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-04-17 09:33 --- That seems to fix the original complaint with the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/bugs/gfortran-4.3/ls_prec $ gfortran-4.3 -Wall -pedantic -Wconversion -o test test.f90 test.f90:10.20: lvar = 2_long**33

[Bug fortran/35945] New: Complex module-based overloading fails

2008-04-15 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35945

[Bug fortran/35882] New: Miscounted continuation lines when interspersed with data

2008-04-09 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http

[Bug fortran/35786] New: OpenMP Fortran PRIVATE on parameter gives error in gfc_finish_var_decl

2008-04-01 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64

[Bug fortran/35786] OpenMP Fortran PRIVATE on parameter gives error in gfc_finish_var_decl

2008-04-01 Thread J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-04-01 14:13 --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the report; the internal compiler error is definitely a compiler bug. However, I believe the program is invalid. I know the program is invalid (thought that went without saying