Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project

2022-10-12 Thread Jonathan Corbet
Mark Wielaard writes: > Then lets just let the past be the past. Now that the proposal is > public lets discuss it publicly. There have been various question > about the details on the overseers list. Lets just discuss those and > see how we can move forward. Along those lines, I asked a few que

Re: GFDL/GPL issues

2010-08-16 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:45:53 -0400 Robert Dewar wrote: > I think there is a difference between a novel you can hold and > read, and computer documentation. My question was not whether > anyone reads books any more, it was whether people read computer > manuals in this form any more. Just as a ra

Re: Patch pinging

2010-07-01 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:57:59 EDT ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) wrote: > I disagree. From what I see of the industry and its practices, I think the > risk of an attack on Free Software due to lack of providence issues is > INCREASING, not decreasing. As FLOSS software makes more and

Re: Patch pinging

2010-06-29 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:39:11 -0700 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > I am doing what I can. However, looking at other projects doesn't help > very much because most other projects simply don't worry about these > issues. That is, for example, why the Linux kernel was vulnerable to > the SCO lawsuit I

Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC)

2010-04-26 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:50:14 -0400 "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > If with kernel you mean Linux, then they require you to agree to an > type of assignment (though not in paper form), same for git. No. What you agree to is the developers certificate of origin (DCO), which says you have the right

Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC)

2010-04-26 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:00:13 -0400 "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: >Given that there are plenty of high-profile projects out there >which seem to be entirely safe in the absence of copyright >assignment policies, why, exactly, does GCC need one to be "legally >safe"? > > I do not know

Re: Why not contribute? (to GCC)

2010-04-25 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:51:17 -0400 "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > Not much can be done to either of those, the copyright assignments are > necessary to keep GCC legally safe. Given that there are plenty of high-profile projects out there which seem to be entirely safe in the absence of copyright as