Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #5)
That's great... works even for Fortran code :-)
Wow!
well, many thanks to those people making sanitizer happen
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
A recent regression, likely introduced between r204496
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Testcase:
MODULE M1
TYPE T1
INTEGER, PRIVATE :: I=0
END TYPE T1
TYPE T2
TYPE(T1) :: D1
END TYPE T2
TYPE(T2), PARAMETER :: D2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58290
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
This appears to have been fixed / gone latent between r204377 and r204433 (~
Nov 6th.)
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
gcc version 4.9.0 20131106 (experimental) [trunk revision 204433] (GCC) yields
the following internal compiler error:
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x9fee4f
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Created attachment 31172
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31172action=edit
reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59020
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #41 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #40)
What's the status on this?
I checked comment #34 and a number of the bugs marked as dup, and they all seem
to pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
I can't reproduce it with the reduced testcase, so fixed?
Magically fixed, also the original ones.. maybe add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57742
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
Confirmed. - Sorry for the breakage and thanks for the report!
Not sure how the saying goes exactly, but 'those that do
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Most likely caused by the fix for PR fortran/58579
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203088root=gccview=rev
cat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58024
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
This bug is a bit of showstopper for doing automatic leak testing with
gperftools (essentially all our regtests have a non-zero error code with this
leak being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58292
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Trunk yields:
bug.f90: In function ‘dbcsr_buffers_flush’:
bug.f90:28:0: error: virtual definition of statement not up-to-date
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58290
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58291
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58290
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58292
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #31 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Easwaran Raman from comment #30)
Created attachment 30727 [details]
New patch
fixes all previously observed issues and further light testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #29 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #28)
OK, with only the patch mentioned above applied all testcases now pass. I
think this patch should be posted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-03-24 00:00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #28 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Easwaran Raman from comment #27)
These two test cases pass for me (compiles with -O3) with the attached patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Easwaran Raman from comment #21)
Created attachment 30690 [details]
Proposed patch
I tested this patch on top of the one posted to the mailing list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #24 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Also the other 'dup' PRs still fail (gcc -O3) . Collecting testcases here:
cat PR58018.c
int a, b, c, d, e;
void bar (int p)
{
int f = b;
e = p = (f ^= 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #25 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
*** Bug 58248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #13 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #12)
Started with r199048.
yes, as was pointed out in PR57370
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370#c2
which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Following invalid testcase yields and ICE with current trunk.
cat small.f90
type sysmtx_t
type(ext_complex_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58024
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57978
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57978
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57978
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Reduced testcase:
subroutine Change_calendar (ts_arr, target_calendar)
integer, dimension(1) :: NO_DAY = (/ 0 /), ONE_DAY = (/ 180 /)
integer, allocatable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57784
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57400
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
The following testcase:
cat test.f90
TYPE data
INTEGER :: x(10)
END TYPE
TYPE data_areas
TYPE(data) :: y(10)
END TYPE
TYPE(data_areas) :: z(10)
integer, volatile :: i,j,k
i=1 ; j=1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29800
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2007-02-16 16:08:18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29800
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
(Finally) FIXED on the GCC 4.9 trunk.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #14 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #13)
I believe a lot of progress has been made indeed.
However, the fundamental(?) issue of module sizes growing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Since the bug is still 'unconfirmed', I'm wondering if this can not be
reproduced, or if I can provide some more information (more than the small
testcase in comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Reduced testcase, which appears 'minimal' to trigger a hanging compilation at
gfortran -c -O2 -ffast-math bug.f90
cat bug.f90
SUBROUTINE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Simplified testcase that fails with 'gfortran -c -g -O2 -ffast-math bug.f90'
cat bug.f90
SUBROUTINE xb88_lr_adiabatic_lda_calc(npoints,e,g,sx)
IMPLICIT REAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57442
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
still fails with r199397
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
Bug 57393 depends on bug 57337, which changed state.
Bug 57337 Summary: [4.9 Regression] 416.gamess ICE on x86 after r199048
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Created attachment 30179
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30179action=edit
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9 Regression] compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
I killed the compilation after 15h...
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Between rev 199047 and 199075 the attached testcase started using an excessive
amount of time (up from about 4s with 4.7.2). The important option seems to be
-ffast-math (16s without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
I actually suspect the compilation is in an infinite loop. Still running after
15min.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
The following is a code snippet with an implicit save for the variable I.
SUBROUTINE T()
INTEGER :: I=1
WRITE(6,*) I
I=I+1
END SUBROUTINE T
CALL T()
CALL T()
END
Expecting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #16 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #15)
I was able to download your code, and I can't reproduce the problem on
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with current trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-08 06:18:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 at revision 198697 with the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-08 13:03:59 UTC ---
Reduced testcase that still triggers the valgrind warning during compilation:
MODULE orbital_pointers
INTEGER, DIMENSION
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
Bug #: 57192
Summary: [4.9 Regression] miscompilation at -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-07 18:54:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created attachment 30047 [details]
Proposed patch
I'll give it a try.
Meanwhile, this might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-07 19:01:56 UTC ---
BTW, on trunk:
../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c: In function ‘void
analyze_candidates_and_replace()’:
../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-07 19:16:31 UTC ---
Current trunk (without the patch) seems to fix also the original problem. At
least for this case, the proposed patch seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Bug #: 57160
Summary: short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57089
Bug #: 57089
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at
cfgloop.c:1647
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-04-26 07:12:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
As James Van Buskirk pointed out, the algorithm will fail if k 0.
note that in the case of k being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-04-17 19:36:45 UTC ---
With these patches in, parallel compilation of multi-file cp2k becomes
significantly faster. Time for a full build goes from 70s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-03-29 06:13:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Untested (but successfully compiled) patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/options.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/options.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TSAN: Fortran/OMP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-03-29 08:12:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a Now link instead.
I think this would be really
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31021
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47341
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-30 11:21:06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
--- Comment #22 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-03-29 08:33:31 UTC ---
Improved in part by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-03/msg00143.html
as r197124 for 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-04-06 10:57:29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-11-14 00:00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-29 11:27:01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41453
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-29 00:00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40194
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40362
--- Comment #15 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-03-29 09:11:10 UTC ---
*** Bug 50175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47532
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
401 - 500 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
