Re: Help with new GCC git workflow...

2020-01-14 Thread Julien "FrnchFrgg" Rivaud
Le 14/01/2020 à 17:07, Peter Bergner a écrit : As somewhat of a git newbie and given gcc developers will do a git push of our changes rather than employing a git pull development model, I'd like a little hand holding on what my new gcc git workflow should be, so I don't screw up the upstream

Re: GIT: Monotonically increasing trunk and release branch ids

2020-01-11 Thread Julien "FrnchFrgg" Rivaud
Le 11/01/2020 à 14:49, Jakub Jelinek a écrit : On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 07:43:17AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Maybe even add https://gcc.gnu.org/gNNN for 7-40 hexadecimal digits redirect to

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

2019-12-29 Thread Julien "FrnchFrgg" Rivaud
Le 30/12/2019 à 01:18, Joseph Myers a écrit : Do "git log egcs_1_1_2_prerelease_2" in gcc-reparent, for example. The history ends up containing two different versions of SVN r5 and of many other commits. When trying to migrate Blender from svn to git, we actually tried git-svn first, and it

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

2019-12-29 Thread Julien "FrnchFrgg" Rivaud
Le 29/12/2019 à 18:30, Ian Lance Taylor via gcc a écrit : On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:49 AM Julien '_FrnchFrgg_' RIVAUD wrote: Which brings me to something I find strange in your policy: to me, merges from trunk to branches should be rare if not nonexistent. And you are deciding to banish

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT

2019-12-28 Thread Julien "FrnchFrgg" Rivaud
Le 28/12/2019 à 21:28, Segher Boessenkool a écrit : On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 05:11:47PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote >> I disagree. The review comments will show up as additional commits on the branch and can be tracked back to such events. Once history gets flattened into a major