-Original Message-
From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:37 PM
To: Meissner, Michael; Mark Mitchell; GCC
Subject: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04)
Michael Meissner wrote:
One patch that got dropped on the floor was my patch
-Original Message-
From: FX Coudert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:01 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Meissner, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bootstrap is broken on i[345]86-linux
Bootstrap has been broken since 2007-03-25 on i[345]86-linux
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Joe Buck
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:02 PM
To: Andrew Pinski
Cc: Florian Weimer; Steven Bosscher; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Building mainline and 4.2 on Debian/amd64
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
François-Xavier Coudert
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 5:54 AM
To: GCC Development
Subject: Has insn-attrtab.c been growing in size recently?
Hi all,
A bootstrap attempt of GCC mainline on a
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Paubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 5:43 AM
To: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Meissner, Michael; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [OT] char should be signed by default
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:29:29AM +0100
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:19 AM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: char should be signed by default
GCC should treat plain char in the same fashion on all types of
machines
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Basile STARYNKEVITCH
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:30 AM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: variable-sized array fields in structure?
Hello all,
It is common to have structures which end with an
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of H.
J. Lu
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 5:35 PM
To: Janis Johnson
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Menezes, Evandro;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFC: Add BID as a configure time option
-Original Message-
I would like to say the one thing I have not heard through this
discussion is the real reason why the C standards comittee decided
signed overflow as being undefined. All I can think of is they were
thinking of target that do saturation for plus/minus but wrapping
-Original Message-
From: H. J. Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:09 PM
To: Menezes, Evandro
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rajagopal, dwarak; Meissner,
Michael
Subject: Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
On Mon, Dec
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Mark Mitchell
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:50 PM
To: DJ Delorie
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
DJ Delorie wrote:
And back to my
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of hector riojas roldan
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:40 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Fortran Compiler
Hello, I would like to know if there is a fortran compiler
that runs on AMD 64 bits. I have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Ron McCall
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 2:33 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code
Hi!
Does anyone happen to know if it is possible to link
(and run)
I suspect it isn't matching pattern #2, because it couldn't get a QI
register, and instead it falls back to the general case of moving to a
normal register. I believe the gcc_assert should contain a check for
CONST_INT as well as a QI register or memory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
When -mtune=generic was added, it was expected that it would go into the
4.2 GCC release, since it clearly missed the 4.1 window for new
features. As desirable for both AMD and Intel that the new behavior be
propagated, I feel like Mark that it should wait for GCC 4.2, since it
clearly is a new
When I used to work for Cygnus Solutions (and then Red Hat after they
bought Cygnus in 1999), the general port to an embedded target was
typically done in parallel by 3 people (or 3 groups for large ports).
Before starting out, somebody would design the ABI (either customer
paying for the port,
:43 PM
To: Meissner, Michael
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: porting gcc/binutils
Hi Michael,
first, thanks for your detailed instructions
snip
If your target is a regular target like a RISC platform, the CGEN system
can be used to simplify building the instruction tables:
http
One of the classic places that sparse bitmaps were used in GCC in the
past is in register allocation phase, where you essentially have a 2D
sparse matrix with # of basic blocks on one axis and pseudo register
number on the other axis. When you are compiling very large functions,
the number of
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 6:43 AM
To: Meissner, Michael
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
From: Meissner, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yao qi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Thu, 8
changes that I'm forgetting about, and also
the 64-bit support probably changes things also.
-Original Message-
From: Yao qi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:10 PM
To: Meissner, Michael
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
From: Meissner
-
From: Yao Qi qi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:14 PM
To: Meissner, Michael
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
From: Meissner, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yao qi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
And note Yao qi, that there are different ABIs on the rs6000, each of
which has different conventions (ie, you will need to study the AIX ABI
as well as the System V/eabi ABIs, and possibly other ABIs that are now
used).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
22 matches
Mail list logo
