Hi Jakub,
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 10:17 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Jakub: How about using git bisect instead, and identify the compiler
binaries with the git commit sha1?
That is really not useful. While you speed it bisection somewhat by avoiding
network traffic and communication with a
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:14 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
While PR53646 claims that c++98 and c++11 should be ABI
compatible (modulo bugs), the addition of the _M_size member
to std::_List_base::_List_impl makes libraries using
std::list in headers incompatible
This is pretty nasty
Hi guys,
I spent a little time recently researching ways to reduce the number of
unique named relocations that must be processed at dlopen time for large
C++ libraries[1]. Apologies for spamming all 3 lists like this, but it
touches all 3 projects.
Since almost all function
Hi Ian / Andi,
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 07:56 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
* Use GNU instead of SUSE, as this is for the GNU tools.
Ah yes; you noticed the subliminal advertising ;-) If you're happy for
me to trample on the GNU section namespace that's fine, but I hesitate
to tread there
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 06:57 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
Maitaining a C++ linker map isn't easy. I think gcc should help out
here.
What do you suggest ? - something separate from the visibility markup ?
perhaps what I'm suggesting is some horribly mis-use of that. Clearly
adding a new
