Sounds great, thanks for sharing!
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Yunfeng ZHANG zyf.zer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all:
I'm pleased to announce my gcc plugin on gcc-4.6.3 has been released, it
collects data from gcc compilation stage and dump them to sqlite-database just
like cscope, but with
Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
something with the timestamp as well.
I would like to have those files if possible. would that be acceptable?
mike
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Mike Dupont
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 October 2012 09:25, Mike Dupont wrote:
Well in this case, what about a random temp file name? tmpfile ?
something with the timestamp as well.
I would like to have those files if possible. would
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
Creating the temp file yourself has the advantage you know what the
name is, whereas if GCC creates it you need to look for new files or
check timestamps to find what name it used.
so we can have three options that
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Alternatively, inform the user that -save-temps is ignored and continue ...
(I can see people annoyed by foreign Makefiles and tying to get at
preprocessed
source with CFLAGS=... -save-temps)
that also makes
using a very recent : gcc version 4.8.0 20121021 (experimental) (GCC)
h4ck3rm1k3@gcc10:~/experiments/build/glibc$ echo int x; | g++
-save-temps -x c -
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-.i’
this causes problems compiling glibc with -save-temps.
is this known? should I report a
Hi there,
on the gcc buildfarm :
/home/h4ck3rm1k3/experiments/gcc-build/
I am having problems with a standard build of the gcc using the 4.5.1 compiler.
1. ./morestack.vis:1: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `:'
Hi,
I think what you want is a custom allocator :
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt04ch11.html
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/doc/html/interprocess/allocators_containers.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2439536/strategy-to-allocate-free-lots-of-small-objects
hope
thanks for sharing, will check this out.
mike
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:05 PM, James Courtier-Dutton
james.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know most compilers go from AST to CFG.
I am writing a decompiler, so I was wondering if anyone knew of any
documents describing how best to get from CFG
Thats great,
I have also tried in the distant past do so C++ compilation. Will have
to get back on the bandwagon.
mike
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I have committed rev 190402, which merges the cxx-conversion branch into
trunk. Thanks to everyone
to be clear,
I have also tried in the distant past do some C++ compilation of the
gcc. I had some ideas for making c++ interfaces to the classes and
some code. Also for converting some macros into inline functions for
type safety.
mike
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup
Thats very interesting, thanks for sharing.
mike
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Santos danielfsan...@att.net wrote:
Yes, my topic sounds crazy huh? But you guys made it possible when you
started optimizing out constant function pointers. (Thank you!!) This
didn't mature to full power
12 matches
Mail list logo
