Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

this list > before you post again, thanks. > > > On May 14, 2021, at 7:47 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches < > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > Hi there IT-fascists, clowns, master-clowns, > > totally-confused-incompetent-code-plumbers, > > activity-t

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

Hi there IT-fascists, clowns, master-clowns, totally-confused-incompetent-code-plumbers, activity-trapped-silent-high-performers, stay-out-of-trouble-silent-high-performers! (Guess where G.J. Lay fits in the collection...). Please be aware that I do not read any messages here (including the one

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 18:49, abebeos wrote: > (failed to join gcc, so posting here) > > Is there any private email where one can file complaints re > project-maintainers (or "those who are supervising the maintainers") ? > > Is there any information about the process for such complaints? > >

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 01:43, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 5/10/2021 3:45 PM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > I've described this in my message here: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/569913.html > > > > The summary is possibly

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 01:35, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:45 PM abebeos > wrote: > > > > The bounty was filed/advertised by the gcc project, so the gcc project > should have intervened immediately at the point where an anonymous coward > rigged the voting process

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 23:32, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021, 9:52 AM abebeos > wrote: > >> Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence >> of this, which is of course directly related to gcc. >> >> (bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

(unable to comment to this without loosing my temper. So... no comment) On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 05:49, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 8:33 AM abebeos > wrote: > > > > To me this sounds quite like an "disorganized mess, where bullies, > abusers and even IT-fascists can thrive".

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence of this, which is of course directly related to gcc. (bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all starts here, at gcc. On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 07:48:50PM

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

It is just fascinating to see how you don't realize that this affects mainly gcc. On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 01:42, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > It is a gcc issue, see the very first link you've quoted ( > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729). > > IIUC you're complaining about the

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 20:32, Koning, Paul wrote: > > > > On May 9, 2021, at 11:33 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches < > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > Thank you for your quick response. > > > > ... > > The Issue: > > > > https:

Re: [GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

e this topic here, if the gcc-project had a decent CI, or a build-setup used by all developers. On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 05:06, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 8:49 AM abebeos via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > > Is there any private email where one

[GOVERNANCE] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

(failed to join gcc, so posting here) Is there any private email where one can file complaints re project-maintainers (or "those who are supervising the maintainers") ? Is there any information about the process for such complaints? Related Issue:

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > > > I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience > > running various builders: > > > > * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder > > infrastructure).

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:25, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> > >> I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience > >> running various builders: > >> > >> * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 18:50, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 1/5/21 2:18 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law > > wrote: > > > > On 12/31/20 7:13 AM, abebeos wrote: > > [...] > > > > I'm definitely curious about the testing

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/31/20 7:13 AM, abebeos wrote: > [...] > > > I'm definitely curious about the testing setup and > > whether or > > > not it can > > > be replicated into our Jenkins setup. > > > > > > > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

> > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law > <mailto:l...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Essence: > > > > > > I need

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:14, abebeos wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: >> > Essence: >> > >> > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as p

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:31, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > Segher Boessenkool schrieb: > > >On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07:22AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > > >>>On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool > > >>> wrote: > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 23:20, abebeos wrote: > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > [...] > I'd ask the original author, but it seems he's busy with other work, so to >> > avoid delays... >> >> Please try to ask him first? That

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 22:44, abebeos wrote: [...] > And look at this: > > * 200h (estimation) for the patch > Not my work, other author(s).

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

+cc: Law, Biener, On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 20:27, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > On понеделник, 14 декември 2020 г. 20:53:36 EET Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On петък, 11 декември 2020 г. 19:00:35 EET abebeos wrote: > > > After "digesting" a bit more your review, I need to thank you for > opening > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 04:01, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/14/20 12:10 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On четвъртък, 10 декември 2020 г. 10:24:50 EET Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:42 AM Dimitar Dimitrov > wrote: > >>> On сряда, 9 де

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:57, abebeos wrote: > > > Στις Πέμ, 10 Δεκ 2020 στις 7:42 π.μ., ο/η Dimitar Dimitrov < > dimi...@dinux.eu> έγραψε: > >> On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: >> > Essence: >> > >&g

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:51, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > (I really tried to follow this > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches, > > but my stomach) > > > > Hi there all! > > > > The attached patch contains a new avr-backend, stripped from cc0. > > > > The author is gcc maintainer Snethil

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 01:15, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:20:01PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > > > > Ok, to speed things up, is it ok if I simply pick the patch that

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:44PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 10:02 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > > > > My understanding of

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 10:02 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > Hi! > > Thanks for trying to push this forward. > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:49:18PM +0200, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 8:32 μ

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 8:32 μ.μ., ο/η Jeff Law έγραψε: > > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Πέμ, 10 Δεκ 2020 στις 7:42 π.μ., ο/η Dimitar Dimitrov έγραψε: > On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/a

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Πέμ, 10 Δεκ 2020 στις 7:42 π.μ., ο/η Dimitar Dimitrov έγραψε: > On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/a

[RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Essence: I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu works fine. The problem with the avr target is that the testsuite cannot be run easily, mainly because of the need for a special simulated-target setup, which does not work for avr as