[Bug middle-end/98715] ICE in make_decl_rtl with double variable length array (VLA)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98715 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Klimov --- Clang does not think that the code is valid: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized

[Bug c/98715] New: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c

Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: alserkli at inbox dot ru Target Milestone: --- <https://godbolt.org/z/z763xG>: void f(int n) { int a[n][n] = {{}}; } gives on trunk (also gcc 4.9.0, but not 4.8.5): during RT

[Bug c++/66490] New: [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed for -g at tree.c:13450 (TYPE_CANONICAL is not compatible)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: alserkli at inbox dot ru Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 35741 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35741action=edit from root/core

[Bug c++/65390] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65390 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) Might be a dup of PR63584. PR63584 does not produce ICE in 5.0

[Bug c++/65390] New: ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1361

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: alserkli at inbox dot ru Created attachment 35013 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35013action=edit preprocessed source g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20150311 (experimental) === e.cc === #include memory auto f(int n){ return

[Bug tree-optimization/64823] [5 Regression] false may be used uninitialized, missed jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823 Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED

[Bug ipa/64978] [5 Regression] ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978 Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alserkli

[Bug preprocessor/64803] [5 Regression] __LINE__ inside macro is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64803 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru --- Thanks! Your patch works for llvm.

[Bug c/64823] New: [5.0 Regression] false may be used uninitialized

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: alserkli at inbox dot ru Compilation of (GDB) 7.9.50.20150127-cvs with (GCC) 5.0.0 20150127 fails due to false warning (gdb is compiled with -Werror). It was not a problem in GCC 4.7.2. // a.c: simplified from the expansion

[Bug c/64803] New: __LINE__ inside macro is not constant

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: alserkli at inbox dot ru The following code (simplified from EXPECT_DEATH(VariantValue(VariantMatcher::SingleMatcher(varDecl())) in llvm/tools/clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/Dynamic/VariantValueTest.cpp:149) #define C(a, b) a ## b #define L

[Bug c++/46056] [C++0x] range-based for loop does not destruct iterators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46056 Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22086|0 |1

[Bug c++/46056] [C++0x] range-based for loop inside lambda crashes if _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46056 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru 2010-10-19 18:22:11 UTC --- Created attachment 22086 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22086 simple testcase

[Bug c++/46056] [C++0x] range-based for loop does not destruct iterators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46056 Alexander Klimov alserkli at inbox dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++0x] range-based for |[C++0x] range

[Bug c++/46056] New: range-based for loop inside lambda crashes if _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46056 Summary: range-based for loop inside lambda crashes if _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3