[Bug rtl-optimization/114768] New: Volatile reads can be optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114768 Bug ID: 114768 Summary: Volatile reads can be optimized away Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #9 from Antoni --- Created attachment 57810 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57810=edit Patch to fix the issue I was unable to create a reproducer in C for the tests. It seems the problem was actually in

[Bug analyzer/114285] Use of uninitialized value when copying a struct field by field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114285 --- Comment #8 from Antoni --- Created attachment 57726 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57726=edit Reproducer using union I tried switching to a union and I still get the same error. A union is used by std::optional, so I

[Bug analyzer/114285] Use of uninitialized value when copying a struct field by field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114285 --- Comment #5 from Antoni --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > >Rust will sometimes copy uninitialized memory and I'd like to avoid > >disabling this specific warning. > > > Note in C, there are specific rules about copying

[Bug analyzer/114285] Use of uninitialized value when copying a struct field by field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114285 --- Comment #4 from Antoni --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > >Rust will sometimes copy uninitialized memory and I'd like to avoid > >disabling this specific warning. > > > Note in C, there are specific rules about copying

[Bug analyzer/114285] New: Use of uninitialized value when copying a struct field by field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114285 Bug ID: 114285 Summary: Use of uninitialized value when copying a struct field by field Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #8 from Antoni --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2) > inlined_call_event's ctor should probably assert that params > tree apparent_callee_fndecl, > tree apparent_caller_fndecl, >

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #7 from Antoni --- I don't know if this helps, but I added a small Rust reproducer that can trigger the segfault when compiled with rustc_codegen_gcc and the corresponding GIMPLE for this Rust reproducer.

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #6 from Antoni --- Created attachment 57439 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57439=edit Rust reproducer

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #5 from Antoni --- Created attachment 57438 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57438=edit GIMPLE for the Rust reproducer

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #4 from Antoni --- I might be able to soon create a reproducer, but for now, I can say it might be related to __attribute__ ((always_inline)).

[Bug target/112575] Segfault in libgccjit due to not cleaning up some target specific cache

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112575 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/113923] New: Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 Bug ID: 113923 Summary: Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug jit/113842] New: Assertion failure in assemble_external_libcall due to a missing finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113842 Bug ID: 113842 Summary: Assertion failure in assemble_external_libcall due to a missing finalizer Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug regression/113722] New: Folding of __builtin_bswap128 doesn't work anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113722 Bug ID: 113722 Summary: Folding of __builtin_bswap128 doesn't work anymore Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/113343] New: Float values are not correct when cross-compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113343 Bug ID: 113343 Summary: Float values are not correct when cross-compiling Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/112910] Getting the size of the type size_t returns the wrong value on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112910 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Yes, but it isn't available in recording. Perhaps I could use it with another solution that is in the work, though.

[Bug jit/112910] Getting the size of the type size_t returns the wrong value on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112910 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56831 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56831=edit Patch fixing this bug

[Bug jit/112910] New: Getting the size of the type size_t returns the wrong value on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112910 Bug ID: 112910 Summary: Getting the size of the type size_t returns the wrong value on some platforms Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/108762] Add support for target-dependent builtins in libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108762 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #54452|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug jit/112603] Allow setting the personality function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112603 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56628 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56628=edit Patch

[Bug jit/112603] New: Allow setting the personality function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112603 Bug ID: 112603 Summary: Allow setting the personality function Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/112602] Support vector permutation and access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112602 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56627 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56627=edit Patch

[Bug jit/112602] New: Support vector permutation and access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112602 Bug ID: 112602 Summary: Support vector permutation and access Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug target/112576] "unrecognizable insn" in libgccjit when using some target-specific builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112576 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56611 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56611=edit Patch

[Bug target/112576] New: "unrecognizable insn" in libgccjit when using some target-specific builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112576 Bug ID: 112576 Summary: "unrecognizable insn" in libgccjit when using some target-specific builtins Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/112575] Segfault in libgccjit due to not cleaning up some target specific cache

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112575 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56610 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56610=edit Patch

[Bug jit/112574] Add support for bfloat16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112574 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56609 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56609=edit Patch

[Bug target/112575] New: Segfault in libgccjit due to not cleaning up some target specific cache

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112575 Bug ID: 112575 Summary: Segfault in libgccjit due to not cleaning up some target specific cache Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug jit/112574] New: Add support for bfloat16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112574 Bug ID: 112574 Summary: Add support for bfloat16 Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/111396] Segfault when using -flto with libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396 --- Comment #2 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56554 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56554=edit Patch fixing the issue

[Bug jit/112466] Add support for getting the supported CPU features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112466 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 56547 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56547=edit Patch implementing this feature

[Bug jit/112466] New: Add support for getting the supported CPU features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112466 Bug ID: 112466 Summary: Add support for getting the supported CPU features Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/111396] New: Segfault when using -flto with libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396 Bug ID: 111396 Summary: Segfault when using -flto with libgccjit Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug lto/109854] New: Error: junk `(%rip)' after expression when using -flto on files compiled with and without -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109854 Bug ID: 109854 Summary: Error: junk `(%rip)' after expression when using -flto on files compiled with and without -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status:

[Bug jit/108762] Add support for target-dependent builtins in libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108762 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 54452 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54452=edit Add support for machine-dependant builtins

[Bug jit/108762] New: Add support for target-dependent builtins in libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108762 Bug ID: 108762 Summary: Add support for target-dependent builtins in libgccjit Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/107999] [13 Regression] jit.dg/test-error-array-bounds.c now fails because [-Warray-bounds] was updated to [-Warray-bounds=] in error messages after r13-4410-g7c01d029fca669263b9c2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107999 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2022q4/001594.html

[Bug jit/96089] Support initializers for global variables.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96089 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/108078] Canot compare vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108078 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/108078] New: Canot compare vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108078 Bug ID: 108078 Summary: Canot compare vector types Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/107770] Comparison of vectors of float doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107770 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/107999] New: test-error-array-bounds.c now fails because [-Warray-bounds] was updated to [-Warray-bounds=] in error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107999 Bug ID: 107999 Summary: test-error-array-bounds.c now fails because [-Warray-bounds] was updated to [-Warray-bounds=] in error messages Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/107863] New: ICE with unrecognizable insn when using -funsigned-char with some AVX builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107863 Bug ID: 107863 Summary: ICE with unrecognizable insn when using -funsigned-char with some AVX builtins Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/107770] New: Comparison of vectors of float doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107770 Bug ID: 107770 Summary: Comparison of vectors of float doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/106095] Some AVX builtins produce invalid asm with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106095 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/105812] type mismatch in binary expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/106095] Some AVX builtins produce invalid asm with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106095 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 53212 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53212=edit patch fixing the bug

[Bug target/106095] New: Some AVX builtins produce invalid asm with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106095 Bug ID: 106095 Summary: Some AVX builtins produce invalid asm with -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/105829] Allow getting the size of floating-point types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/105829] Allow getting the size of floating-point types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 53075 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53075=edit First patch

[Bug jit/105829] New: Allow getting the size of floating-point types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829 Bug ID: 105829 Summary: Allow getting the size of floating-point types Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug jit/105827] Infinite recursion in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105827 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 53074 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53074=edit First patch

[Bug jit/105827] New: Infinite recursion in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105827 Bug ID: 105827 Summary: Infinite recursion in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug jit/105812] type mismatch in binary expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 53067 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53067=edit Patch

[Bug jit/105812] New: type mismatch in binary expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812 Bug ID: 105812 Summary: type mismatch in binary expression Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/104293] New: Add support for setting the alignment of variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104293 Bug ID: 104293 Summary: Add support for setting the alignment of variables Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/104073] New: Add option to hide stderr logging in libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104073 Bug ID: 104073 Summary: Add option to hide stderr logging in libgccjit Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug jit/104072] New: Register variables in libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104072 Bug ID: 104072 Summary: Register variables in libgccjit Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/104071] New: Add support for bitcast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104071 Bug ID: 104071 Summary: Add support for bitcast Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit Assignee:

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/95415] Add support for thread-local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/96066] Cannot use values from some builtins because they are of void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/96889] Reflection API accessible from the jit C API

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96889 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- No. The only patch that is ready for review is "libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api".

[Bug jit/100380] Segfault when using inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380 --- Comment #7 from Antoni --- Since then, I found a workaround to fix the similar segfault in my other feature. It might work for solving this and goes like this: instead of trying to access the rvalue when first replaying the asm, create an

[Bug jit/95498] unhandled conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95498 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/96089] Support initializers for global variables.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96089 --- Comment #2 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50851 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50851=edit Add patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable I made this patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable.

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #5 from Antoni --- This is much less work as I'm reusing the rustc front-end.

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- I develop a gcc codegen for the Rust compiler and it's a feature of Rust to be able to set the link section:

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50847 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50847=edit Patch adding support for setting the link section

[Bug jit/100688] New: Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 Bug ID: 100688 Summary: Add support for link section Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/95415] Add support for thread-local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50842 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50842=edit Patch to add this feature I created a patch to add TLS variables.

[Bug jit/95325] Support 128-bit integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50835 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50835=edit Patch add support for sized integer types That patch not only add support for 128-bit integers, but also all other sized

[Bug jit/96067] __atomic_compare_exchange_n should return bool instead of void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96067 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug jit/96066] Cannot use values from some builtins because they are of void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066 --- Comment #4 from Antoni --- *** Bug 96067 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug jit/96066] Cannot use values from some builtins because they are of void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50832 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50832=edit Patch to fix the issues with using atomic builtins I implemented the missing types and fixed the type checking.

[Bug jit/96079] Unresolved atomic builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96079 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/100380] Segfault when using inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380 --- Comment #5 from Antoni --- I can confirm that the problem is indeed what I described in my previous post. One solution would be to check if the rvalue was replayed (and if not, replay it now), but that involves adding this check

[Bug jit/100380] Segfault when using inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380 --- Comment #4 from Antoni --- I just had a similar issue when developing a new feature for libgccjit and it might be the same problem. If it is (I haven't checked in this case), here's what's happening: * The asm is replayed. * The asm

[Bug jit/100380] Segfault when using inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380 --- Comment #2 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50731 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50731=edit Working code So, the segfault seems to happen when creating the variable after creating the extended asm expression. Here's

[Bug jit/100380] Segfault when using inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380 Antoni changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50729|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug jit/100380] New: Segfault when using inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380 Bug ID: 100380 Summary: Segfault when using inline asm Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50668 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50668=edit Smaller reproducer Ok, I figured out how to find the location of the error. In this case, it's caused by using the modulo

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #2 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50666 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50666=edit Third part of the reproducer

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50665 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50665=edit Second part of the reproducer

[Bug jit/100242] New: libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 Bug ID: 100242 Summary: libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal