http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732
--- Comment #7 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gretay
Date: Thu May 2 15:45:10 2013
New Revision: 198547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198547root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog
2013-05-02 Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297
--- Comment #7 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
Created attachment 30138 [details]
frontend patch, second try
This variant reduces the amount of VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, which should make the
code less
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297
--- Comment #3 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks a lot for the quick responses! Unfortunately, the frontend patch alone
doesn't fix the problem, as Richard pointed out, but it may be needed for other
reasons. The tree-sra patch fixes
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gretay at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: arm-none-eabi
Created attachment 30126
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30126action
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732
--- Comment #6 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-01 17:32:14 UTC ---
Thanks for the small testcase! There is indeed a problem with rtl epilogue
generated for naked functions. Here is a fix, testing in progress.
diff --git a/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
--- Comment #4 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29 16:58:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 29974
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29974
testcase
The attached test case fails for arm-none-eabi on trunk, caused
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
--- Comment #3 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 14:17:52 UTC ---
Author: gretay
Date: Fri Apr 19 12:55:26 2013
New Revision: 198091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198091root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-19 Greta Yorsh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
--- Comment #4 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 14:18:04 UTC ---
Author: gretay
Date: Wed Apr 24 10:43:41 2013
New Revision: 198220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198220root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-24 Greta Yorsh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57050
Bug #: 57050
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr56982.c compilation,
-O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55688
Bug #: 55688
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr55650.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55161
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55676
Bug #: 55676
Summary: ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:423
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #5 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 12:28:55 UTC ---
Sorry, Jakub, I meant to say I am *not* entirely following the explanation...
I can run a regression test with this patch for arm-none-eabi on qemu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #3 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-30 17:34:44 UTC ---
I am entirely following the explanation of the failure, but the patch fixes the
testsuite regression and the assembly generated for libgcc/_ssnegSQ.o seems
correct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
Bug #: 55451
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #1 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-23 17:41:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 28766
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28766
reduced preprocessed input that causes the failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55326
Bug #: 55326
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-complex.C (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55327
Bug #: 55327
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c scan-tree-dump-times
vect vectorized 1 loops 2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54976
Bug #: 54976
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr47975.c (internal compiler
error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
--- Comment #4 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 08:41:43 UTC ---
Author: gretay
Date: Wed Jul 11 08:41:37 2012
New Revision: 189423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189423
Log:
2012-07-10 Greta Yorsh greta.yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
29 matches
Mail list logo
