[Bug tree-optimization/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-07 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #21 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-07 09:05 --- -fno-tree-reassoc fixes the problem here, With -fno-tree-reassoc : vect-iv-9.c:15: note: === vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized === vect-iv-9.c:10: note: vectorized 1 loops in function. vect-iv-9.c:26: note

[Bug tree-optimization/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-07 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #25 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-07 12:43 --- Uros you rock! That patch fixes the problem for me, thank you! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #9 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-06 09:34 --- CC'ing Dorit to get his idea on the vectorizer dump. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #11 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-06 13:33 --- (In reply to comment #10) I have noticed, that following text is missing from your vect dump: Dependence tester statistics: Number of dependence tests: 0 Number of dependence tests classified dependent: 0

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #14 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-06 17:01 --- I tried building without BOOT_CFLAGS and such but no luck. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug tree-optimization/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #18 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-07 03:12 --- I started a reghunt with 20080104 snapshot, if that fails too I am out of ideas why this happens. But I am sure this is the second time I see this file failing but later on its fixed so I thought it was noise

[Bug tree-optimization/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #19 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-07 04:49 --- Even 20080104 snapshot fails, I have no idea why this only one test fails and all other pass though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-05 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-05 10:21 --- I bootstrapped twice and still get it. I will try svn up, reboot the machine etc *sigh* -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-05 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-05 11:53 --- Ok on a third bootstrap I can still reproduce, is there a way to debug it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-05 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-05 12:38 --- The long only shows: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c scan-tree-dump-times vect vectorized 1 loops 2 nothing else. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-05 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #7 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-05 13:20 --- Adding __attribute__((aligned(16))) doesn't work, attached is the *.vect file. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-05 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #8 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-05 13:20 --- Created an attachment (id=15099) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15099action=view) *.vect file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug middle-end/35085] New: [4.3 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails

2008-02-04 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr GCC host triplet: i686-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35085

[Bug target/35045] [4.3 Regression] gcc-4.3 generates wrong code on i386 with -O3

2008-02-01 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #6 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-02-01 10:45 --- Nice, this is what I was seeing all along. Shouldn't this be a P1 though? -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/35053] New: SSE2 testcase crashes

2008-02-01 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35053

[Bug c++/35007] New: [4.3 Regression] Firefox fails to build with affentry.cpp:94: error: ISO C++ forbids subscripting non-lvalue array

2008-01-28 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35007

[Bug c++/35007] [4.3 Regression] Firefox fails to build with affentry.cpp:94: error: ISO C++ forbids subscripting non-lvalue array

2008-01-28 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-29 01:04 --- Created an attachment (id=15044) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15044action=view) preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35007

[Bug c++/35007] [4.3 Regression] Firefox fails to build with affentry.cpp:94: error: ISO C++ forbids subscripting non-lvalue array

2008-01-28 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-29 01:07 --- Compilation line is : c++ -o affentry.o -c -I../../../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include ../../../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM -DEXPORT_XPT_API -DEXPORT_XPTC_API

[Bug c++/35007] [4.3 Regression] Firefox fails to build with affentry.cpp:94: error: ISO C++ forbids subscripting non-lvalue array

2008-01-28 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-29 01:06 --- Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --includedir=/usr/include --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir

[Bug c++/35007] [4.3 Regression] Firefox fails to build with affentry.cpp:94: error: ISO C++ forbids subscripting non-lvalue array

2008-01-28 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-29 02:11 --- Yes it works if you revert c++/27177 fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35007

[Bug middle-end/34978] New: FAIL: g++.dg/expr/cast7.C (internal compiler error)

2008-01-25 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/34923] New: Bootstrap fails due to a crash at libiberty/argv.c: expandargs

2008-01-22 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34923

[Bug middle-end/34923] Bootstrap fails due to a crash at libiberty/argv.c: expandargs

2008-01-22 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-22 14:45 --- This only happens when make profiledbootstrap is used. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34923

[Bug middle-end/34923] Bootstrap fails due to a crash at libiberty/argv.c: expandargs

2008-01-22 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-22 15:51 --- Thats the exact place I crash, though 2008-01-19 snapshot was OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34923

[Bug middle-end/34923] Bootstrap fails due to a crash at libiberty/argv.c: expandargs

2008-01-22 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-22 17:04 --- --enable-checking=yes with make profiledbootstrap works with revision 131727 here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34923

[Bug middle-end/34923] Bootstrap fails due to a crash at libiberty/argv.c: expandargs

2008-01-22 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-22 17:37 --- Looks fixed with current trunk. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/34905] New: valgrind error indication from testsuite typeck.c:comptypes

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34905

[Bug middle-end/34906] New: valgrind error indication from testsuite gimplify.c: gimplify_asm_expr

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34906

[Bug middle-end/34905] valgrind error indication from testsuite typeck.c:comptypes

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-21 17:11 --- Used svn revision 131650. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added GCC

[Bug middle-end/34906] valgrind error indication from testsuite gimplify.c: gimplify_asm_expr

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-21 17:13 --- Used svn revision 131650. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added GCC

[Bug middle-end/34907] New: valgrind error indication from testsuite trans-types.c: gfc_typenode_for_spec

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug middle-end/34907] valgrind error indication from testsuite trans-types.c: gfc_typenode_for_spec

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-21 21:59 --- Used svn revision 131650. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34907

[Bug middle-end/34907] valgrind error indication from testsuite trans-types.c: gfc_typenode_for_spec

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-21 22:00 --- Also this part seems to apply too: ==29085==· ==29085== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==29085==at 0x811A4B9: gfc_typenode_for_spec (trans-types.c:848) ==29085==by 0x810041F

[Bug middle-end/34908] New: valgrind error indication from testsuite hashtab.c : htab_hash_string

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34908

[Bug middle-end/34909] New: valgrind error indication from testsuite c-pch.c: c_common_write_pch

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34909

[Bug middle-end/34909] valgrind error indication from testsuite c-pch.c: c_common_write_pch

2008-01-21 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-21 22:06 --- Used svn revision 131650. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added GCC

[Bug middle-end/34725] [4.3 regression] gcc 4.3-rev 131213 miscompiles libgcrypt 1.4.0 at -O2 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer

2008-01-19 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-20 04:57 --- --disable-padlock fixes the crash so the crashing part is the inline asm that is under #ifdef ENABLE_PADLOCK_SUPPORT . -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/34843] Missing overflow diagnostic for Python 2.5's unicodeobject.c

2008-01-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 16:41 --- Looks like -Wall being at the end disables this warning uh oh. This is invalid, sorry for taking your time. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/34843] Missing overflow diagnostic for Python 2.5's unicodeobject.c

2008-01-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 17:19 --- Actually I am reopening this because after talking to Richi we agree that -Wall should not reset -Wstrict-overflow. But of course final decision is up to iant. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed

[Bug middle-end/34856] ICE with some constant vectors

2008-01-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 19:45 --- on i686 linux I get; test.c:16: internal compiler error: in for_each_index, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:222 works with gcc 3.4.6. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34856

[Bug c/32102] -Wall stomps on -Wstrict-overflow

2008-01-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 18:46 --- I think then -Wall shouldn't enable -Wstrict-overflow at all. Because current situation is counter intuitive. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32102

[Bug c/32102] -Wall stomps on -Wstrict-overflow

2008-01-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #6 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 19:11 --- Manu, Your fix looks quite obvious, could you send it to gcc-patches so we can fix this before the freeze? Thanks for the quick fix btw. Regards, ismail -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32102

[Bug middle-end/34843] New: Missing overflow diagnostic for Python 2.5's unicodeobject.c

2008-01-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
2.5's unicodeobject.c Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot

[Bug middle-end/34843] Missing overflow diagnostic for Python 2.5's unicodeobject.c

2008-01-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 01:46 --- Created an attachment (id=14964) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14964action=view) Preprocessed source code for unicodeobject.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34843

[Bug c/34841] 'make check' of libsndfile-1.0.17 fails with gcc-4.2.2 -O2 optimization, OK with -O1 one

2008-01-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #9 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 02:45 --- File lossy_comp_test.c starting line 761 : sum_abs = abs (sum_abs + abs (abs (data [k]) - 256)) ; if (sum_abs 1.0) { printf (\n\nLine %d: Signal is all zeros (%d, 0x%X).\n, __LINE__, sum_abs

[Bug c/34841] 'make check' of libsndfile-1.0.17 fails with gcc-4.2.2 -O2 optimization, OK with -O1 one

2008-01-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #11 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 03:10 --- Actually the only bug here is that -Wstrict-overflow should issue a warning for that line. About the dependency on optimization level, signed integer overflow is undefined in C standard so its not a good idea

[Bug c/34841] 'make check' of libsndfile-1.0.17 fails with gcc-4.2.2 -O2 optimization, OK with -O1 one

2008-01-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #13 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-18 03:22 --- I don't think thats possible given the fact that an optimization pass modifies code to be able to well optimize it. Implications and merits of -fwrapv is discussed deeply before, you might want to Google

[Bug middle-end/32044] [4.3 regression] udivdi3 counterproductive, unwarranted use

2008-01-14 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #41 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-15 02:42 --- (In reply to comment #40) This bug cause linux kernel unable to compile. So I think it must be fixed before 4.3 is released Yes and there is a known workaround, see comment #28 -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/32135] [4.3 Regression] bogus array-ref fold triggering array overflow warning

2008-01-13 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #7 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-13 14:01 --- This is possibly is the reason for new test failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c (test for warnings, line 59) FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c (test for warnings, line 65) FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c (test

[Bug target/34641] [4.3 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

2008-01-10 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #7 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-11 02:31 --- Added testcase doesn't compile on i686-linux : gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr34641.C:16: error: 'operator new' takes type 'size_t' ('unsigned int') as first parameter -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr

[Bug middle-end/34718] New: gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails with --disable-checking

2008-01-08 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34718

[Bug middle-end/34718] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c fails with --disable-checking

2008-01-08 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-09 02:37 --- No longer producable with trunk revision 131409 - invalid. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34698] [4.3 regression] common_6.f90 gives internal compiler error

2008-01-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-07 01:32 --- I mean 2008-01-06 snapshot of course, duh. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34698

[Bug fortran/34698] New: [4.3 regression] common_6.f90 gives internal compiler error

2008-01-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34698

[Bug target/32276] [4.3 Regression]: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx

2008-01-02 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-03 01:51 --- I think component shouldn't be target because it fails on more than one platform. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32276

[Bug fortran/34616] New: CBLAS_ICAMAX test from cblas fails

2007-12-29 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
) -- Summary: CBLAS_ICAMAX test from cblas fails Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot

[Bug c++/34397] [4.3 regression] ICE on invalid default template parameter

2007-12-25 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #11 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-26 05:19 --- Can confirm on i686 linux: [~] g++ test.cpp test.cpp:3: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://bugs.pardus.org.tr

[Bug libgomp/34519] New: pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34519

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-18 14:17 --- I was testing outside of the testsuite to see why it failed. I see this in log : PASS: libgomp.c/pr26943-2.c (test for excess errors) Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/var/pisi/gcc-4.3_pre20071218-31/work/gcc-4.3

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-18 14:39 --- [~] gcc -fopenmp -march=i486 pr26943-2.c -lgomp [~] ./a.out [~] works fine like this, I don't know why it fails in the tests. Hmm wonder if --with-cpu=generic could affect this? This is a 4 CPU Xeon machine btw

[Bug libgomp/34519] pr26943-2.c is regressed on mainline

2007-12-18 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-18 23:11 --- Re-tested with no problems now, but machine was under %300 load when this test failed. Interestingly rest of the regtests passed fine. Anyway this is invalid. Thanks for the attention. -- ismail at pardus dot

[Bug middle-end/34515] New: -Wstrict-overflow produces extra warnings

2007-12-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34515

[Bug middle-end/34515] -Wstrict-overflow produces extra warnings

2007-12-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-17 20:42 --- Created an attachment (id=14787) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14787action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34515

[Bug middle-end/34515] -Wstrict-overflow produces extra warnings

2007-12-17 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-17 20:42 --- s/for warning/first warning -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34515

[Bug middle-end/26061] error and warning count

2007-12-16 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #16 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-16 16:12 --- Created an attachment (id=14780) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14780action=view) Unbreak lib{gomp,stdc++,ffi} tests -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What

[Bug middle-end/26061] error and warning count

2007-12-16 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #17 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-16 16:14 --- Created an attachment (id=14781) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14781action=view) Fix typo in the last patch -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/26061] error and warning count

2007-12-16 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #19 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-16 16:55 --- Hi, (In reply to comment #18) * My original patch modified several testsuite files: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01190.html, I guess you would need something equivalent. I added a flag

[Bug middle-end/34477] New: [4.3 regression] Standard autoconf mktime test is too slow when compiled with -O2

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34477

[Bug middle-end/34477] [4.3 regression] Standard autoconf mktime test is too slow when compiled with -O2

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-15 10:27 --- Created an attachment (id=14766) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14766action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34477

[Bug middle-end/34477] [4.3 regression] Standard autoconf mktime test is too slow when compiled with -O2

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-15 10:30 --- Timings with gcc 3.4.6 : [~] gcc -o mktime mktime.c [~] time ./mktime real0m0.052s user0m0.021s [~] gcc -O2 -o mktime mktime.c [~] time ./mktime real0m0.032s user0m0.021s sys 0m0.011s So

[Bug middle-end/34477] [4.3 regression] Standard autoconf mktime test is too slow when compiled with -O2

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-15 11:52 --- I don't believe this is invalid changing time_t_max and time_t_min to unsigned long doesn't fix the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34477

[Bug middle-end/34477] [4.3 regression] Standard autoconf mktime test is too slow when compiled with -O2

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #6 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-15 11:52 --- Created an attachment (id=14768) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14768action=view) Testcase with unsigned long values -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/26061] error and warning count

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #14 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-15 22:05 --- Created an attachment (id=14769) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14769action=view) Better patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26061

[Bug middle-end/26061] error and warning count

2007-12-15 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #15 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-15 22:06 --- Attached is a better patch which adds -f{no}-show-error-count and uses it in regression tests so regtests works now. IDE's also can use this option. Is it possible to get this in for gcc 4.3 or gcc 4.4

[Bug middle-end/34454] New: [4.3 regression] Overflow check is optimized away when -O2 is enabled

2007-12-13 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34454

[Bug middle-end/34454] [4.3 regression] Overflow check is optimized away when -O2 is enabled

2007-12-13 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-13 19:37 --- FWIW this triggers a crash in Python 2.5, see http://bugs.python.org/issue1608 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34454

[Bug middle-end/34454] [4.3 regression] Overflow check is optimized away when -O2 is enabled

2007-12-13 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-13 20:48 --- Guido agreed on using -fwrapv hence a patch submitted, thanks for the diagnosis. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34454

[Bug ada/34356] New: Can't bootstrap ADA on mainline

2007-12-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34356

[Bug ada/34356] Can't bootstrap ADA on mainline

2007-12-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-06 12:23 --- Dup of bug #32581, stupid me. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32581 *** -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/32581] make profiledbootstrap - stageprofile - gcc/ada/a-except.adb:1301: error: control flow in the middle of basic block 20

2007-12-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-06 12:23 --- *** Bug 34356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/32581] make profiledbootstrap - stageprofile - gcc/ada/a-except.adb:1301: error: control flow in the middle of basic block 20

2007-12-06 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-06 20:56 --- a-except.adb ali.adb cstand.adb einfo.adb exp_attr.adb exp_dbug.adb osint.adb par.adb prepcomp.adb restrict.adb rtsfind.adb s-os_lib.adb scn.adb sem_attr.adb sem_util.adb sprint.adb switch-c.adb targparm.adb

[Bug c/34337] New: Internal error while building gtkwhiteboardc.c from pidgin 2.3.0

2007-12-04 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34337

[Bug c/34337] Internal error while building gtkwhiteboardc.c from pidgin 2.3.0

2007-12-04 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-04 19:18 --- Created an attachment (id=14699) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14699action=view) Preprocessed source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34337

[Bug middle-end/34337] Internal error while building gtkwhiteboardc.c from pidgin 2.3.0

2007-12-04 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #2 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-04 19:29 --- Forget to add used options : -g -march=i686 -mtune=native -O2 is used. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34337

[Bug middle-end/34337] Internal error while building gtkwhiteboardc.c from pidgin 2.3.0

2007-12-04 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-04 19:29 --- gcc -v shows: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/4.3.0 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.0/include

[Bug middle-end/34337] [4.3 Regression] Internal error while building gtkwhiteboardc.c from pidgin 2.3.0

2007-12-04 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #7 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-05 07:24 --- Just a note, this seems to break kernel-2.6.24 compilation too, out of memory and cc1 gets killed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34337

[Bug c/34321] gcc fails glibc 2.7 regression tests

2007-12-03 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-03 08:00 --- Also the check-localplt test fail : cat build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/check-localplt.out --- ../scripts/data/localplt-i386-linux-gnu.data2006-01-30 11:29:48.0 +0200 +++ - 2007-12-03

[Bug c/34321] gcc fails glibc 2.7 regression tests

2007-12-03 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-03 11:01 --- Created an attachment (id=14687) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14687action=view) glibc double test -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34321

[Bug c/34321] gcc fails glibc 2.7 regression tests

2007-12-03 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-03 11:02 --- Just run ./build.sh to build and ./test-double to run. Gives the following error with gcc 4.3 trunk here : testing double (without inline functions) Failure: Real part of: csin (-0 + inf i) == -0 + inf i

[Bug c/34321] gcc fails glibc 2.7 regression tests

2007-12-03 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #3 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-03 10:49 --- I will try to get two tests out of glibc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34321

[Bug middle-end/33088] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] spurious exceptions with -ffloat-store

2007-12-03 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #10 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-12-03 11:17 --- This breaks glibc 2.7 regression tests. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33088

[Bug c/34321] New: gcc fails glibc 2.7 regression tests [double test]

2007-12-02 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34321

[Bug middle-end/34300] gcc 4.2.2 miscompiles code that uses global register variables

2007-11-30 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #4 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-11-30 11:56 --- Are we sure it works with trunk? Because this is initially found as a clisp crash bug and it still crashes with gcc 4.3 trunk but only when compiled with -O2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug middle-end/34300] gcc 4.2.2 miscompiles code that uses global register variables

2007-11-30 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-11-30 11:59 --- Indeed testcase doesn't abort with gcc 4.3 20071130 , so there must be another gcc bug hiding there :( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34300

[Bug middle-end/32044] [4.3 regression] udivdi3 counterproductive, unwarranted use

2007-11-26 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #28 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-11-27 05:55 --- Mark, Linux 2.6 tree as of this minute doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 trunk. You need to add -fno-tree-scev-cprop to the KBUILD_CFLAGS, but this is not upstreamed yet and I am not sure if it'll be accepted in case

[Bug regression/34221] New: -save-temps is broken on mainline

2007-11-25 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34221

[Bug regression/34221] -save-temps is broken on mainline

2007-11-25 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-11-25 23:21 --- Looks like a ccache bug instead. -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/6585] Redundant store/load instruction pairs on ix86

2007-11-22 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #13 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-11-23 06:02 --- Mainline now looks like : [~] cat mul.s .file mul.c .text .p2align 4,,15 .globl mul .type mul, @function mul: subl$8, %esp movl%ebx, (%esp

[Bug c/34167] New: [4.3 regression] gcc fails to compile Linux kernel

2007-11-20 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34167

[Bug middle-end/32044] [4.3 regression] udivdi3 counterproductive, unwarranted use

2007-11-20 Thread ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
--- Comment #26 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2007-11-20 21:19 --- *** Bug 34167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed: What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >