[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized a 1

2012-03-13 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #3 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2012-03-13 08:11:40 UTC --- First, I tried gcc 4.4.3 on x86-64, and it works for this test case, so it is to some extension a GCC regression. Second, I tried trunk, and I can

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

2012-02-28 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 --- Comment #1 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2012-02-29 03:23:46 UTC --- I've attached a proposed fix. Jiangning, can you please apply this and see if your performance problem is resolved? Bill, Confirmed, I think your

[Bug tree-optimization/52424] dom prematurely pops entries from const_and_copies stack

2012-02-28 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424 --- Comment #2 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2012-02-29 03:42:17 UTC --- Jiangning Liu reported that the following C code has recently experienced degraded performance on trunk. (Jiangning, please fill in the Host/Target

[Bug middle-end/39976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Big sixtrack degradation on powerpc 32/64 after revision r146817

2012-02-24 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976 --- Comment #44 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2012-02-24 08:09:25 UTC --- I'm not sure if this kind of bug has been completely fixed, and posted a qeustion in mail list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-02/msg00415.html .

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

2011-10-31 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #56 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2011-10-31 07:48:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #54) I tested with GCC 4.6.2 and the patch provided by Mikael Pettersson. It works for -march=armv4t and -march=armv5t

[Bug c/50272] New: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance

2011-09-01 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272 Bug #: 50272 Summary: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/50272] A case that PRE optimization hurts performance

2011-09-01 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272 --- Comment #1 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2011-09-02 05:11:38 UTC --- Richard gave some analysis at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-08/msg00037.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

2011-08-08 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #41 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2011-08-09 02:04:52 UTC --- Yes, this is from the libstdc++ sources (4.6.1 20110627, libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opnt.cc). You need a non-EABI ARM variant of GCC since this bug

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

2011-04-26 Thread jiangning.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiangning.liu