[Bug c/85962] spurious warning on right shift constant > integer in trivially dead code

2018-05-28 Thread joshudson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85962 --- Comment #1 from Joshua --- (first three lines is because you don't want bug reports with external header files--3 lines is a lot better than all of stdint.h and limits.h)

[Bug c/85962] New: spurious warning on right shift constant > integer in trivially dead code

2018-05-28 Thread joshudson at gmail dot com
ity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: joshudson at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- spurious warning on right shift constant > integer when code would be eliminated by optimization step because it is only rea

[Bug target/27234] no way to stop gcc from mucking with the incoming argument stack

2006-04-22 Thread joshudson at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from joshudson at gmail dot com 2006-04-22 23:28 --- The code that calls all the asmlinkage calls does so through a vector table. Consequently, it does not know how many arguments it calls. However, the arguments live in particular registers when called, so it just pushes

[Bug c/24727] New: type const void * produces a warning when promoting to void *

2005-11-07 Thread joshudson at gmail dot com
Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: joshudson at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: Multiple http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24727

[Bug c/24727] type const void * produces a warning when promoting to void *

2005-11-07 Thread joshudson at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from joshudson at gmail dot com 2005-11-08 04:25 --- Aren't function arguments contravariant rather than covariant? -- joshudson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added