[Bug libfortran/77868] Fail to NULL guard check for internal unit in inquire_via_unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77868 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Oct 5 16:32:24 2016 New Revision: 240794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240794=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-05 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/77868

[Bug libfortran/77828] [7 Regression] Linking gfortran-7 compiled program with libgfortran of 5.x allowed but crashes when containing write to string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Just need to edit the trunk/libgfortran/libtool-version file, bumping the major rev number and build from a clean build directory. I have tested this and it works fine. I want to see if we are going to get

[Bug libfortran/77868] Fail to NULL guard check for internal unit in inquire_via_unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77868 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/77868] New: Fail to NULL guard check for internal unit in inquire_via_unit

Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Subject is self explanatory. The commit that added the check broke a few test cases.

[Bug libfortran/77828] [7 Regression] Linking gfortran-7 compiled program with libgfortran of 5.x allowed but crashes when containing write to string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 39746 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39746=edit One approach to resolving this With the attached patch, here is the result of trying to go forward or backward with

[Bug libfortran/77828] [7 Regression] Linking gfortran-7 compiled program with libgfortran of 5.x allowed but crashes when containing write to string

||2016-10-03 CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply

[Bug fortran/66643] Missing compilation error for formatted data transfer without format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66643 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66643] Missing compilation error for formatted data transfer without format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66643 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 30 23:19:58 2016 New Revision: 240686 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240686=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-30 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/66643

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 30 04:49:36 2016 New Revision: 240645 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240645=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-29 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on six, one more to go

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Sep 29 18:08:05 2016 New Revision: 240627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240627=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-29 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk. Will backport in a few days.

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 28 19:43:03 2016 New Revision: 240593 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240593=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 28 19:38:03 2016 New Revision: 240592 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240592=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to tprince from comment #8) > I show my configure parameters in my test results posts. At some time in > the past, each of them has been important. I don't know if the parameters > quoted by

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 23 20:36:21 2016 New Revision: 240456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240456=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/71363] Issue when sizeof(double) = sizeof(long double)

|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5) > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:25:00PM +0000, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > I will try to study the script some more later today. Changing status to > > unco

[Bug libfortran/71363] Issue when sizeof(double) = sizeof(long double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug libfortran/71363] Issue when sizeof(double) = sizeof(long double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 39669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39669=edit Revised patch for review/testing This revised patch speeds up execution on non DTIO internal units by saving and

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 Bug 58020 depends on bug 59015, which changed state. Bug 59015 Summary: I/O of PARAMETER derived type with private component is forbidden https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59015 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/59015] I/O of PARAMETER derived type with private component is forbidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59015 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77532] ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at fortran/interface.c:4622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77532 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Sep 10 21:16:45 2016 New Revision: 240074 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240074=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-10 Paul Thomas Steven G. Kargl

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Sep 6 23:22:26 2016 New Revision: 240018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240018=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-06 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 39577 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39577=edit Patch for testing, fixes comment #2? This patch for testing. I have tested on x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0 which also

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10) > The test FAILs on Solaris (both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit): > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f0_2.f90 -O0 execution test > FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f0_2.f90

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > Works for me here! > > Are you sure that you have tested > > print "(f8.0)", huge(1.0) > print "(f18.0)", huge(1.0_8) > print "(f20.0)", huge(1.0_10)

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- The update to the test case should correct any platform specific KIND issues. May need to upsize the bufers a little for Dominique's issue. I set the buffers tight so we could catch different behaviors on

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Sep 1 21:17:42 2016 New Revision: 239945 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239945=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-01 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > At revision r239908 the second test in comment 0 still gives > > > ** > > Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault -

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Aug 31 17:54:32 2016 New Revision: 239901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239901=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-31 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Aug 31 17:45:26 2016 New Revision: 239900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239900=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-31 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

||2016-08-26 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/73142] [5/6 Regression] Reading a namelist fails - my code worked until 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73142 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/73142] [5/6 Regression] Reading a namelist fails - my code worked until 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73142 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Aug 11 17:28:51 2016 New Revision: 239382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239382=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-11 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug libfortran/71123] Namelist read failure on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71123 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Aug 11 17:28:51 2016 New Revision: 239382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239382=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-11 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/73142] [5/6 Regression] Reading a namelist fails - my code worked until 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73142 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Aug 11 17:08:54 2016 New Revision: 239381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239381=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-11 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug libfortran/71123] Namelist read failure on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71123 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Aug 11 17:08:54 2016 New Revision: 239381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239381=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-11 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/73142] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Reading a namelist fails - my code worked until 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73142 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/73142] Reading a namelist fails - my code worked until 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73142 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have confirmed this is a duplicate of 71123. The fix is trivial. --- trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c2016/05/24 04:15:39 236627 +++ trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c2016/05/24 06:11:21

[Bug fortran/73142] Reading a namelist fails - my code worked until 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73142 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargl from comment #16) > fixed on trunk. Thanks Steve, I am working on some other magic, did not get to it.

[Bug fortran/71523] Static variables given automatic initializers with -finit-* and -fmax-stack-var-size

||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed, Closing

[Bug fortran/71523] Static variables given automatic initializers with -finit-* and -fmax-stack-var-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71523 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Jul 17 20:13:41 2016 New Revision: 238420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238420=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-17 Fritz Reese PR fortran/71523

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) --- snip --- > > f951: out of memory allocating 18446744073441116160 bytes after a total of > 569344 bytes > I should mention there is really nothing wrong

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have found that there is a practical limit of 2**28-1 on the size. The test case: program p character, parameter :: z = 'z' print *, repeat(z, (268435456)) ! 2**28 end gives when compiled: f951:

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jul 16 06:06:45 2016 New Revision: 238412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238412=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jul 16 05:10:10 2016 New Revision: 238411 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238411=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jul 16 03:54:12 2016 New Revision: 238410 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238410=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/71686] ICE on broken character continuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71686 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/62125] Nested select type not accepted (rejects valid)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/62125] Nested select type not accepted (rejects valid)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Jul 15 19:58:55 2016 New Revision: 238400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238400=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-15 Jerry DeLisle Marco Restelli

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Latest patch posted here. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-07/msg00046.html Still testing.

[Bug fortran/71839] undefined reference to `_gfortran_caf_stop_str'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71839 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/62125] Nested select type not accepted (rejects valid)

||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- I tested the patch. No regressions. Works as advertised. I will submit the patch for approval and see if we can commit

[Bug fortran/71770] gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71770] gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- I am getting wfdb and will attemt to confirm this bug on non-cygwin.

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Jul 8 04:36:16 2016 New Revision: 238156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238156=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-07 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/71764

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have regression tested the fix and tried some various manipulations of test code and it all seems to be fine. So I will commit this.

[Bug fortran/71770] gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/71764] compiler internal error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/66575] Endless compilation on missing end interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66575 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66575] Endless compilation on missing end interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66575 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Jul 4 21:04:55 2016 New Revision: 237994 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237994=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-04 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/66575

[Bug fortran/35849] "wrong" line shown in error message for parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35849 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/35849] "wrong" line shown in error message for parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35849 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Jul 4 19:14:54 2016 New Revision: 237993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237993=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-04 Jerry DeLisle Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- Taking this

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargl from comment #12) > === > --- check.c (revision 237855) > +++ check.c (working copy) > @@ -3820,7 +3820,7 @@

[Bug fortran/71686] ICE on broken character continuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71686 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jun 29 19:04:58 2016 New Revision: 237861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237861=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-29 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/71686

[Bug fortran/71686] ICE on broken character continuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71686 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jun 29 18:48:37 2016 New Revision: 237860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237860=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-29 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/71686

[Bug fortran/71686] ICE on broken character continuation

||2016-06-29 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- I will take this one.

[Bug fortran/71686] ICE on broken character continuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71686 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/71649] Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71649] Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Jun 26 01:03:19 2016 New Revision: 237789 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237789=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-25 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/71649

[Bug fortran/71649] Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- With: if (tmp_symtree) { if (tmp_symtree->n.sym && tmp_symtree->n.sym->module && strcmp (modname, tmp_symtree->n.sym->module) == 0) return; gfc_error ("Symbol %qs at %C

[Bug fortran/71649] Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- I will regtest and commit the patch sometime today.

[Bug fortran/71649] Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to jack.s...@nasa.gov from comment #2) > > > > Could someone check that the problem is not darwin specific? > > Not darwin specific. Is the sample code valid?

[Bug fortran/71649] Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/48925] Code cleanup in write_float.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 Bug 48852 depends on bug 48925, which changed state. Bug 48925 Summary: Code cleanup in write_float.def https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Jun 23 15:58:05 2016 New Revision: 237735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237735=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37811|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libfortran/48925] Code cleanup in write_float.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-06/msg00047.html

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-06/msg00047.html

[Bug libfortran/48925] Code cleanup in write_float.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 38707 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38707=edit A preliminary patch This patch does a major reorganization of the code for writing formatted real numbers. Actual

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||48925 --- Comment #15 from Jerry

[Bug libfortran/71123] Namelist read failure on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71123 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71404] [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71404] [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Jerry

[Bug fortran/71404] [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Jun 5 19:58:38 2016 New Revision: 237109 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237109=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-05 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/71404

[Bug fortran/71404] [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Jun 5 19:49:59 2016 New Revision: 237108 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237108=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-05 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/71404

[Bug fortran/71401] [7 regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails starting with r237003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71401 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71404] [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >