[Bug fortran/96024] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in mio_name_expr_t, at fortran/module.c:2159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96025] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expr_check_typed_help, at fortran/expr.c:5437

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96025] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expr_check_typed_help, at fortran/expr.c:5437

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96025 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- With this patch the code compiles: Index: gcc/fortran/module.c === --- gcc/fortran/module.c(revision 280157) +++ gcc/fortran

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > > The code is invalid. Patch against svn revision 280156. > > > > Index:

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > The code is invalid. Patch against svn revision 280156. > > Index: gcc/fortran

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/96013] ICE in write_symbol, at fortran/module.c:5747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96011] ICE in check_function_name, at fortran/decl.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96011 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/95981] ICE in gfc_find_array_ref(): No ref found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95981 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29 Priority

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/95939] [11 Regression] ice with -O3 in compute_live_loop_exits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95939 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95880] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_type, at fortran/symbol.c:2030

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95880 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|wrong

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > The problem seems more serious. > > > > type t > > character(len=:, kind=

[Bug fortran/95837] derived-type components of character kind=4 – wrong code with component access (kind=4 ignored)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95837 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95829] Bogus error with additional blanks in type(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95829 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch makes the UMASK subroutine a generic subprogram. This is accomplished by converting its arguments to INTEGER(4), call _gfortran_umask_i4_sub, and converting the OLD argument back

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- This makes the UMASK intrinsic function generic by converting the input argument to default integer kind and calling the relevant libgfortran function. Index: gcc/fortran/iresolve.c

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > The non-standard SLEEP intrinsic subroutine is documented as taking a > default integer argument. This patch enforces this restriction. > >

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95710] ICE in gfc_type_is_extensible, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95710 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95709] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_code, at fortran/resolve.c:11807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95709 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95718] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong pointer associated status without initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95718 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/95708] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95708 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Long from comment #11) > I checked with the Intel docs and the ia64 version of the compiler (what HPC > users use) does not support x87. > > Is there a gfortran com

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:14:21AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > IEEE-754 calls binary32, 64, 128 the basic formats (Sec. 3, p. 6):

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95640] gfortran ieee_selected_real_kind returns 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95640 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95631] Unable to redefine a literal with `-std=legacy'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95631 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC

[Bug fortran/95613] ICE in main_block_label, at tree-cfg.c:1455

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95613 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95614] ICE in build_field, at fortran/trans-common.c:301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95614 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95612] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_pointer_assign, at fortran/expr.c:4274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95612 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95611] ICE in access_attr_decl, at fortran/decl.c:9075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95611 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status

[Bug fortran/95586] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95586 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/95584] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1260

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95584 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/95585] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95585 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95543] [PDT] ICE in is_CFI_desc, at fortran/expr.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95543 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/95543] [PDT] ICE in is_CFI_desc, at fortran/expr.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95543 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in is_CFI_desc, at |[PDT] ICE in is_CFI_desc

[Bug fortran/95372] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-05 CC

[Bug fortran/95546] Random Fortran test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95546 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Updated patch to deal with comments #1. Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c === --- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (revision 280157) +++ gcc

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95500] Segfault compiling extra interface on intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95500 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/95446] False positive for optional arguments of elemental procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95446 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95398] New: ICE on invalid code

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Code posted at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/mW1gV6tyxXk leads to % gfcx -c a.f90 a.f90:32:16: 32 | foo => array1(2,U) |1 Er

[Bug fortran/95373] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in build_reference_type, at tree.c:7942

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|ice

[Bug fortran/95340] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_select_rank, at fortran/match.c:6690

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95340 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/95352] ICE on select rank with assumed-size selector and lbound intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95342] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_subroutine, at fortran/decl.c:7913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95342 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > (In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #1) > > Related : > > > > > > $ cat z2.f90 > > module m > >interface >

[Bug fortran/95342] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_subroutine, at fortran/decl.c:7913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95342 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/95293] Fortran not passing array by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/95177] error: array subscript has type char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95165] Since 9.1 we do have ISO_Fortran_binding.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95165 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/95104] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Long from comment #3) > A comment from the original user: gfortran 8.3.0 appears to do the right > thing. So perhaps a regression somewhere in the 9.x line?

[Bug fortran/95104] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/95104] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/95053] [11 regression] ICE in f951: gfc_divide()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95053] [11 regression] ICE in f951: gfc_divide()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot

[Bug fortran/95064] [11 regression] ICEs in fortran compiler starting with r11-255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95064 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 50410, which changed state. Bug 50410 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/50410] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC

[Bug fortran/95038] Not treating function result name as a variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/95037] gfortran fails to compile a simple subroutine, issues an opaque message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95037 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC

[Bug fortran/94943] [10 Regression] A module does not export allocatable attribute of herein arrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94931] request: print include path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94769] Possible use of uninitialized variable num

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94769 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94737] BIND(C) names are not always treated as case sensitive.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | --- Comment #3 from kargl

[Bug fortran/94737] BIND(C) names are not always treated as case sensitive. Versions < 8 are ok.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/94660] Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-19 CC

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94585] Automatic LHS reallocation issue with debug options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94585 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93762] Truncation of deferred-length string when passing as optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93762 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94397] [10 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to markeggleston from comment #4) > The compilation error reported is due this change in PR93484: > > --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c > +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c > @@

[Bug fortran/94386] [10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93365.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94411] E0.d not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94411 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94408] Spurious error: ‘rw_nl_grid’ must be a module procedure or an external procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94408 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94397] [10 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94377] Won't compile when deallocating a parameterized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94348] gfortran 8/9 reject module procedure definition in same module as function interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94348 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/94347] Assignment pointer at declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94228] Preprocessor inconsistency for macros when invoked from gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94228 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94192] ICE on wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94192 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/94192] ICE on wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94192 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug libstdc++/89991] Complex numbers: Calculation of imaginary part is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89991 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #44 from

[Bug fortran/93827] fails to initialize logical variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93827 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93948] Surprising option processing of -fdec and -fdec-math in combination with -std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93948 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #24 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #23) > Created attachment 47913 [details] > Diff that replaces handling of degree trig functions. Fritz, I have attached a patch that completely replaces h

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #23 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47913 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47913=edit Diff that replaces handling of degree trig functions.

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > Can you post the code you used for testing? Your patch to simplify.c > affects compile-time constant folding. simplify.c has nothing to do > with a

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93814] [9/10 Regression] ICE in build_entry_thunks, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93814 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch is against svn r280157. Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c === --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 280157) +++ gcc/fortran

[Bug fortran/93833] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in trans_array_constructor, at fortran/trans-array.c:2566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93833 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >