https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70438
--- Comment #2 from Mike Herrick ---
I think that's fine -- a note in the documentation to that effect (describing
what an "opaque" vector type is and what operations are allowed on it) should
suffice.
Thanks.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mjh at edg dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The documentation for Vector Extensions says that the relational operations and
logical operations return vectors of the same width and number of elements as
the operands, but with signed integral
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mjh at edg dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm seeing surprising results at run time when mixing a vector and a scalar in
a logical "and" operation:
$ cat
Component: inline-asm
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mjh at edg dot com
There seems to be an issue with earlyclobbers and multiple alternative
constraints. Take this example:
int f(int out, int in) {
asm(foo %1,%0; : =a (out) : b (in));// Okay
asm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48777
Summary: duplicate pointers to empty structs passed as
arguments to function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
