--- Comment #63 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-16 16:04
---
Subject: Bug 28071
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Mon Apr 16 16:04:18 2007
New Revision: 123874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123874
Log:
PR middle-end/28071
* sched-int.h (struct deps): Split
--- Comment #64 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-16 16:07
---
(In reply to comment #63)
Scheduler memory hungryness should be fixed by the above commit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071
--- Comment #16 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 07:35
---
(In reply to comment #15)
Is the patch mentioned by Maxim checked in now? Because this bug still occurs.
I've posted a patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01220.html
but Jan hasn't commited
--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 13:14
---
Subject: Bug 29682
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Mon Feb 5 13:14:20 2007
New Revision: 121599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121599
Log:
PR target/29682
* config/ia64/ia64.c
--- Comment #7 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 13:28
---
Fixed on trunk and gcc-4_2-branch.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 13:47
---
Confirm this on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.
A strange (and, possibly, accidental) thing is that I hit this error only when
configuring with java. I.e. '--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran' bootstrap
finishes ok
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 16:57
---
Subject: Bug 29682
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Fri Feb 2 16:57:18 2007
New Revision: 121510
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121510
Log:
PR target/29682
* config/ia64/ia64.c
--- Comment #4 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 11:41
---
(In reply to comment #3)
scheduling:6473.35 (100%) usr 0.60 (88%) sys6473.98 (100%)
wall
499608 kB (90%) ggc
On which revision of gcc-4_2-branch or trunk have you seen it? It looks to me
--- Comment #55 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 11:42
---
Created an attachment (id=12879)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12879action=view)
Patch for scheduler dependency lists.
Hi,
This patch introduces new dependency lists to scheduler thus
--- Comment #7 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-19 13:32
---
Hi!
Sorry for the late response.
The scheduler fails to process a basic block with barrier inside it.
The basic block looks like this:
- Basic block 2 - begin -
some insns
(insn:HI 14 12 16 2 (set (mem/f/c
--- Comment #9 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-19 14:00
---
(In reply to comment #8)
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with scheduling and __builtin_trap
Hi,
barrier in the middle of basic block is invalid and should be noticed by
verify_flow_info and ICE
--- Comment #11 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-19 15:24
---
I would suggest put that hunk in (it was probably just merge omision
from my side) and try to remove the verify_flow_info bit and see if
everything works. I can do it tonight or tomorrow unless you beat me
--- Comment #3 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-07 10:02
---
Subject: Bug 29794
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Dec 7 10:02:35 2006
New Revision: 119613
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119613
Log:
2006-12-07 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-07 10:05
---
Subject: Bug 29794
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Dec 7 10:05:29 2006
New Revision: 119614
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119614
Log:
2006-12-07 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-07 10:08
---
Fixed by the above commit.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-16 15:11
---
Subject: Bug 29201
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Nov 16 15:10:57 2006
New Revision: 118893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118893
Log:
2006-11-16 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-16 15:17
---
Fixed by the above commits.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-16 15:20
---
The patch for this bug was posted in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01138.html
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-16 06:58
---
Subject: Bug 29201
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Nov 16 06:57:59 2006
New Revision: 118882
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118882
Log:
2006-11-16 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-06 21:45
---
Subject: Bug 29128
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Fri Oct 6 21:45:13 2006
New Revision: 117515
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117515
Log:
2006-10-06 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-06 21:51
---
Fixed by the above patch.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-01 19:03
---
I posted the patch for this bug at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00023.html
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-23 18:30
---
Created an attachment (id=12315)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12315action=view)
Patch.
That's my bug, sorry. The attached patch has only been tested on x86_64;
sadly, I'll be able to run
--- Comment #13 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 08:48
---
Subject: Bug 28489
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Aug 17 08:48:37 2006
New Revision: 116214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116214
Log:
2006-08-17 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #14 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 08:52
---
Fixed by the earlier attached patch.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 06:54
---
Probably this is a dublicate of 27883.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 12:03
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Created an attachment (id=11997)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11997action=view) [edit]
Patch
This patch bootstraps and has no new regression on {i386, ia64
--- Comment #9 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 13:44
---
(In reply to comment #8)
The time that this started occurring looks to be about the time that Maxim was
making scheduling changes for IA64 speculation. Maxim could you look at this
bug and see
--- Comment #12 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 13:45
---
Created an attachment (id=11996)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11996action=view)
Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490
--- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 13:49
---
Created an attachment (id=11997)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11997action=view)
Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28489
--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 08:51
---
Subject: Bug 27863
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jun 13 08:50:53 2006
New Revision: 114604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114604
Log:
2006-06-13 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #16 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 09:01
---
Subject: Bug 26807
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jun 13 09:00:52 2006
New Revision: 114606
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114606
Log:
2006-06-13 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #17 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 09:03
---
I tested this fix on a cross from i386-pc-linux-gnu and it did well on those
three tests. Can, please, someone check if the regressions gone on hppa?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807
--- Comment #4 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 08:51
---
Subject: Bug 27863
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Jun 8 08:51:13 2006
New Revision: 114484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114484
Log:
2006-06-08 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 08:56
---
Fixed.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 09:11
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Only the testcase is failing and only due to the scheduler changes (which was
said not to effect other targets besides ia64 which looks like it was wrong).
As extended regions
--- Comment #15 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 11:49
---
haifa_sched.c: check_cfg () ICEs because a block with the conditional jump at
the end has only 1 successor (the jump is to the next instruction). I thought
that this is invalid, but now I see
--- Comment #3 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-07 15:29
---
(In reply to comment #2)
I bet a beer that this was caused by:
2006-03-16 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* target.h (struct spec_info_def): New opaque declaration.
Nope. This one
--- Comment #3 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-07 16:09
---
(In reply to comment #2)
The problem is that while ripping off notes before scheduling we don't adjust
bb boundaries. The patch will soon be posted.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #11 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 15:41
---
Subject: Bug 26734
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Thu Mar 30 15:41:00 2006
New Revision: 112538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112538
Log:
2006-03-30 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #12 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 15:43
---
The patch was reapplied:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01721.html
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 17:42
---
Reopen this bug as the patch, which fixes it was reverted from the mainline.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 23:04
---
The patch for this bug is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01589.html
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 21:16
---
(In reply to comment #0)
The compiler builds but when it tries to build libgcc I get a bunch of ICEs.
Here is a small test case that will not compile with -O2 on ia64-hp-hpux11.23
with the ToT compiler
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 20:32
---
(In reply to comment #3)
It may be related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01001.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01000.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
