https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 100948, which changed state.
Bug 100948 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:9069
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 93813, which changed state.
Bug 93813 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_select_type_cases,
at fortran/trans-stmt.c:2874
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93813
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93813
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 93339, which changed state.
Bug 93339 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl,
at gimplify.c:2830
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 92779, which changed state.
Bug 92779 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_funcall,
at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4225
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92779
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92779
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 91941, which changed state.
Bug 91941 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at
fortran/trans-array.c:7336
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91941
What|Removed
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on mainline
Thanks for the report
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 88247, which changed state.
Bug 88247 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen,
at fortran/trans-array.c:2068
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 88247, which changed state.
Bug 88247 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen,
at fortran/trans-array.c:2068
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 85686, which changed state.
Bug 85686 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in
gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104272
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 54811
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54811=edit
Fix for this PR
I was sufficiently intrigued by this bug that I decided that I would look into
it right away. After
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104272
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Following the allocation itself, we get:
solver._data.dim[0].lbound = 1;
solver._data.dim[0].ubound = 2;
solver._data.dim[0].stride = 1;
solver._data.offset = -1;
dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-03
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Kai,
Thanks for the report.
nagfor agrees that the finalization shouldn't occur. From the work that I
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> Did we let this fall in a crack or was there some other holdup?
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As posted by Peter Klausler on clf
complex, save, target :: a(4) = [(1.,0.),(2.,0.),(3.,0.),(4.,0)]
real, pointer :: p(:) => a(1:3:2)%re
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 92960, which changed state.
Bug 92960 Summary: ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal'
structure, have 'component_ref' in add_decl_as_local, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:261
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92960
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98408
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Compiling the test with -Wall gives
>
> 2 | character (len=:), allocatable :: a(:)
> |^
> Warning: '.a'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105205
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
|NEW
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-28
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Dear Saito-san,
Thank you for the report. Confirmed on 13.0.1.
The fault persists even when the limits
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks||87477
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-23
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Good catch. Thanks for the report.
Paul
Referenced Bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109206
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109209
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109209
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
For the record, the fix is:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
index 1d973d12ff1..1a03e458d99 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
@@ -11760,6 +11760,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109209
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #12)
> I bet that's due to the finalization
> commit r13-6747-gd7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee
> but I have not verified.
>
...snip...
See my reply above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109209
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109206
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
--- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas ---
As far as I am aware, this bug has either been fixed or has been worked round
everywhere. However, it doesn't block PR37336 and so I am releasing that
dependency.
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 107914, which changed state.
Bug 107914 Summary: Finalization errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107914
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107914
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 106576, which changed state.
Bug 106576 Summary: Finalization of temporaries from functions not occuring
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 104382, which changed state.
Bug 104382 Summary: Finalization of parent components not compliant with
standard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 96122, which changed state.
Bug 96122 Summary: Segfault when using finalizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122
What|Removed |Added
|RESOLVED
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Florian,
I am closing this as fixed, even though it runs to the third finalization and
then segfaults, because both nagfor and ifort behave in the same way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 93691, which changed state.
Bug 93691 Summary: Type bound assignment causes too many finalization of
derived type when part of other type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93691
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91316
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Jose,
This is fixed to the extent that it behaves in the same way as ifort.
nagfor, on the other hand, gives:
[pault@pc30 pr37336]$ rm ./a.out;nagfor pr91316.f90 -g;./a.out
NAG Fortran Compiler Release
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 88735, which changed state.
Bug 88735 Summary: Nested assignment triggers call of final method for right
hand side
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84472
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on mainline. The testcases now have the same behaviour as ifort and
nagfor.
I will ask to backport to 12-branch in a few weeks.
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 82996, which changed state.
Bug 82996 Summary: ICE and segfault with derived type finalization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82996
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 80524, which changed state.
Bug 80524 Summary: [F03] Problematic behaviour with a finalization subroutine
in gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80524
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80524
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71798
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 71798, which changed state.
Bug 71798 Summary: [OOP] failure to finalise temporary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71798
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 69298, which changed state.
Bug 69298 Summary: [OOP] Array finalisers seem to be given the wrong array when
the array is a member variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69298
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69298
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
This is fixed on mainline. I will ask if I can backport to 12-branch in a few
weeks.
Cheers
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 67471, which changed state.
Bug 67471 Summary: [F03] Finalizer not invoked for assignment to array section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67471
What|Removed |Added
|--- |FIXED
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
This is now fixed on mainline. Once the dust has settled and any nasties rooted
out, I will ask if I can backport to 12-branch.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 67444, which changed state.
Bug 67444 Summary: [F03] RHS in assignment of polymorphic types not finalized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67444
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64290
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 64290, which changed state.
Bug 64290 Summary: [F03] No finalization at deallocation of LHS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64290
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 59694, which changed state.
Bug 59694 Summary: [F03] no finalization of an unused variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the report. However, IMHO the code is invalid since the result of
hdf5Constructor is not defined.
function hdf5Constructor() result(self)
implicit none
type(hdf5Object) ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109075
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #11 from
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work|12.2.0 |
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
See comment at rnflow.f90:899 - As Richard Biener suggested to the list
-fdefault-integer-8 fixes
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown |13.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
8.3.1 20191027 runs through to the end of the program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
>
> > I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> yes, I'm well, and the lack of time is indeed for a good cause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91316
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #1)
> I notice that this is missing from the list of dependencies of PR37336, for
> which a wider fix will be submitted this afternoon.
>
> Best regards
>
> Paul
I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107914
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 53982
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53982=edit
Subsidiary program for testcase
As promised, here is the subsidiary program.
Paul
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: damian at archaeologic dot codes
Blocks: 37336
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 53981
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53981=e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4)
> To add some variety to the tests, nagfor gives
>
> destructor4(complicated) 2.000 2.000
> destructor5 (simple2) 5
> destructor5 (simple2) 6
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Thomas,
I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause?
I have just returned to my finalizer patch. With it applied, your testcase
produces the same output as NAG.
I will attach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 53977
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53977=edit
Ongoing patch for PR37336
Fixes this PR, so testcase will be added to the collection.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 53975
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53975=edit
Fix for this PR
This is a trivial bug. The ICE is occurring in resolve.cc(derived_inaccessible)
because derived types
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-08
Summary|Runtime segfault in |Insufficiently deep
|finalization routine of |allocate/copy for simple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> crayftn 11 & 12 output:
>
> destructor4(complicated) 2*2.
> destructor5 (simple2) 5
> destructor5 (simple2) 6
> destructor2(simple) 2*1
> destructor4(complicated)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #0)
> Created attachment 52349 [details]
> Testcase for the problems
>
> With all branches that feature finalization, the attached testcase outputs:
> final_count after
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 52349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52349=edit
Testcase for the problems
With all branc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 91648, which changed state.
Bug 91648 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:2009
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91648
What|Removed
|--- |FIXED
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
This was fixed by Tobias Burnus with PR/92587
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91316
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 70863, which changed state.
Bug 70863 Summary: [F03] Finalization of array of derived type causes segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69298
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||weiqun.zhang at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Andrew Benson from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80524
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97024
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103366
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
> From F2017: 15.5.2.5
> The actual argument shall be polymorphic if and only if the associated dummy
> argument is polymorphic, and either both the actual and dummy arguments
> shall be unlimited
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103366
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > > > Started with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103366
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > > Started with r9-5372-gbbf18dc5d248a79a.
> >
> > Are you sure?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103854
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
||2021-07-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
> Solution: I think the proper fix is to remove both
> _gfortran_gfc_desc_to_cf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46691
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
301 - 400 of 2180 matches
Mail list logo
