[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46562 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46562=edit Patch for the PR This fixes the original problem and regtests OK. I need to think this through and to test it against

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #21 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to pthaugen from comment #20) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #17) > > sched2 swaps the two insns (37 and 40 for me -- use -dp to see the numbers > > in your .s file, use -da if you

[Bug fortran/91022] A suspicious code in fortran/decl.c

dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0) > Following code contains assignment after return: > > 3512 bool > 3513 gfc_insert_parameter_exprs

[Bug fortran/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7) > I think we can move this to NEW. Please look at comment #10 to PR90786. I am at a complete loss on this one. What to do? Paul

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46511=edit x86_64 Assembler for testcase Hi Thomas and Andrew, I am at a complete loss on this one. The attached x86_64

[Bug fortran/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > See also https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-06/msg00034.html. I have responded to Christophe on the above thread to the effect that I cannot see anything

[Bug fortran/90498] [8 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90498] [8 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 10 05:48:44 2019 New Revision: 272103 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272103=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-10 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/90498

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 18:31:58 2019 New Revision: 272095 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272095=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/57284

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 18:31:11 2019 New Revision: 272094 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272094=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/57284

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 18:26:33 2019 New Revision: 272093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272093=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/57284

[Bug fortran/67894] bounds of assumed-rank dummy argument not equal to actual argument

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Please look at PR89365 - it seems that there has been an historic muddle in the wording if the relevant parts of the standard. I agree with Harald's last comment

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 09:43:37 2019 New Revision: 272090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272090=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89365 *

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > I agree with the analysis of the standard and will add the corrected > > testcase > > to the testsuite. > > Hi Paul, > > Can you please extend the

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jun 8 15:52:38 2019 New Revision: 272084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272084=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90786 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90786] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

||2019-06-08 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Confirmed Paul

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 19 18:08:28 2019 New Revision: 271383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271383=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90498 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 19 12:32:55 2019 New Revision: 271380 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271380=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90498 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > Created attachment 46375 [details] > Patch for the problem > > I very much doubt that this was revision r257065. The problem looks to have > Andre's signature on

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:49:52 2019 New Revision: 271090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271090=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 *

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:49:52 2019 New Revision: 271090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271090=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 *

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:49:52 2019 New Revision: 271090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271090=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 *

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:47:32 2019 New Revision: 271089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271089=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:47:32 2019 New Revision: 271089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271089=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:47:32 2019 New Revision: 271089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271089=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 10 07:59:42 2019 New Revision: 271057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271057=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 10 07:59:42 2019 New Revision: 271057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271057=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 10 07:59:42 2019 New Revision: 271057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271057=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

||2019-05-06 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46299 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46299=edit Fix for the bug

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > Hi Paul, > > > I am sure that the array part is OK. Otherwise, why have a type code for > > strings? > > It > > 18.5 The source file ISO_Fortran_binding.h >

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Thomas, > if the type is character, interoperability also requires that the length > type parameter be omitted or be specified by an initialization > expression whose value is one. > > F2008, 15.3.2 has

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) > (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #5) > > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > > > Currently, I am leaning towards using an option with a

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/87127] External function not recognised from within an associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87127 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Apr 24 07:27:42 2019 New Revision: 270532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270532=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-24 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87127 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Apr 22 06:50:33 2019 New Revision: 270489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270489=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/57284 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46216 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46216=edit Patch for the remaining problems. I am registering this now as a measure of progress towards doing a proper job of

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89846] CFI_select_part creates incorrect descriptor

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk - just in time. Thanks for the report Paul

[Bug fortran/89843] CFI_section delivers incorrect result descriptor

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk - just in time. Thanks for the report Paul

[Bug fortran/89846] CFI_select_part creates incorrect descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89846 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 14 18:14:58 2019 New Revision: 270353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270353=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89843 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 14 18:14:58 2019 New Revision: 270353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270353=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89843 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/89843] CFI_section delivers incorrect result descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89843 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 14 18:14:58 2019 New Revision: 270353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270353=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89843 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/90022] New: Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

: fortran Assignee: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg00013.html for the issue and a testcase. Paul

[Bug fortran/89841] improper descriptor information passed to C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89841 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89842] CFI_allocate fails to allocate object

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/89841] improper descriptor information passed to C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89841 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Mar 30 15:39:00 2019 New Revision: 270037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270037=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89841 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/89842] CFI_allocate fails to allocate object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89842 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Mar 30 15:39:00 2019 New Revision: 270037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270037=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89841 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/88247] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 27 12:51:43 2019 New Revision: 269962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269962=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/88247 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/89363] RANK incorrect for unallocated allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89363 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89364] Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89364] Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Mar 12 13:40:51 2019 New Revision: 269612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269612=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89363 PR fortran/89364

[Bug fortran/89363] RANK incorrect for unallocated allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89363 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Mar 12 13:40:51 2019 New Revision: 269612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269612=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89363 PR fortran/89364

[Bug fortran/87566] ICE with class(*) and select

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87566 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Neil Carlson from comment #12) > The commit r265171 that fixed this issue also introduced a regression in 8.2 > and 9, and certainly the 7 branch too if it was back-ported to it. See > PR89174

[Bug fortran/89476] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_5.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89476 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Many Thanks HJ. I find that there is a ISO_Fortran_binding.h still residing in gfortran.dg, in my tree. Hence the successful regtesting on my side. Sorry about that Paul

[Bug fortran/88117] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88117] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 23 18:44:54 2019 New Revision: 269163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269163=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-23 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88117

[Bug fortran/88117] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 23 14:59:50 2019 New Revision: 269160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269160=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-23 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88117

[Bug fortran/88117] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8) > Author: pault > Date: Sat Feb 23 13:18:47 2019 > New Revision: 269157 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269157=gcc=rev > Log: > 2019-02-23 Paul Thomas >

[Bug fortran/88117] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 23 13:18:47 2019 New Revision: 269157 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269157=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/88117 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/89385] Incorrect members of C descriptor for an allocatable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89385 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89366] Fails to compile BIND(C) interface with assumed-length character argument

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Many thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/89366] Fails to compile BIND(C) interface with assumed-length character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89366 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 23 12:18:44 2019 New Revision: 269156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269156=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89385 PR fortran/89366

[Bug fortran/89385] Incorrect members of C descriptor for an allocatable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89385 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 23 12:18:44 2019 New Revision: 269156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269156=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89385 PR fortran/89366

[Bug fortran/88117] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88117 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- I agree with the analysis of the standard and will add the corrected testcase to the testsuite. Many thanks for sorting this out. Paul

[Bug fortran/89364] Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89363] RANK incorrect for unallocated allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89363 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89385] Incorrect members of C descriptor for an allocatable object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89385 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 89200, which changed state. Bug 89200 Summary: [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 What

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 9 11:11:33 2019 New Revision: 268721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268721=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-09 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89200 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/88247] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 18:23:25 2019 New Revision: 268501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268501=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88393

[Bug fortran/85953] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88980] [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 88980, which changed state. Bug 88980 Summary: [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/88685] [8/9 regression] pointer class array argument indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 14:50:07 2019 New Revision: 268489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268489=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88393

[Bug fortran/88980] [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 14:44:19 2019 New Revision: 268488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268488=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-02 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88980

[Bug fortran/88685] [8/9 regression] pointer class array argument indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 14:40:17 2019 New Revision: 268487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268487=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88685

[Bug fortran/88685] [8/9 regression] pointer class array argument indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 14:37:08 2019 New Revision: 268486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268486=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/88685 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 2 09:23:30 2019 New Revision: 268474 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268474=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/88393 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/88980] [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 2 09:16:44 2019 New Revision: 268473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268473=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/88980 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/88685] [8/9 regression] pointer class array argument indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 2 09:10:58 2019 New Revision: 268472 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268472=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/88685 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82077] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE on associating polymorphic array dummy with a type-guarded array section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82077 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >