--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:12
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 = n n = 1073741823 is true
where n is 1073741824
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09
---
As in:
if (value != 0
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 13:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] mem_fun* code fine with -O1, bus error with -O2
On Oct 11, 2005, at 9:51 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 17:44 ---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to main when linking an object file generated
from multiple .c files
--- Comment #3 from indan at nul dot nu 2005-10-06 17:27 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Note
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-29
14:32 ---
Subject: Re: Massive performance regression for -ffast-math due to the recip
tree pass
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-09-29 14:25
---
(In reply to comment
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-27
23:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] compiler error: Segmentation fault In function
'DESX_CBCUpdate'
On Sep 27, 2005, at 7:52 PM, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-21
13:51 ---
Subject: Re: DCE removes a loop when it shouldn't
On Sep 21, 2005, at 9:46 AM, dorit at il dot ibm dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com
2005-09-21 13:46
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-21
19:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression]: Gcc failed to build on ia64
On Sep 21, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Joern RENNECKE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2005-09-21 Jorn Rennecke [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-19
16:05 ---
Subject: Re: SSA_NAMEs are not released after no longer being used.
On Sep 19, 2005, at 11:59 AM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
We also probably have to set SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT to NULL
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-19
16:44 ---
Subject: Re: SSA_NAMEs are not released after no longer being used.
On Sep 19, 2005, at 12:33 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
And that will not work for the SSA_NAMEs used for aliasing
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-19
18:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] segfault in expand_simple_operations,
tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:637
On Sep 19, 2005, at 2:22 PM, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-17
19:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE with -O3 -ftree-vectorize on 4.1.x
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen
dot de 2005-09-17 19:31 ---
Please fix
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-13
22:41 ---
Subject: Re: local calling convention not used when using -fwhole-program
--combine
On Sep 13, 2005, at 6:36 PM, dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
wrote:
But the above just fixes
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-13
22:49 ---
Subject: Re: local calling convention not used when using -fwhole-program
--combine
On Sep 13, 2005, at 6:36 PM, dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
wrote:
--- Additional Comments From
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-11
15:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] OpenBSD's zic.c causes g++ but not gcc to
segfault
On Sep 10, 2005, at 4:34 PM, geoffk at geoffk dot org wrote:
You should be able to tell if the user set the name
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-09
21:32 ---
Subject: Re: New: [mingw32] sleep malfunction
On Sep 9, 2005, at 5:30 PM, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
+# ifdef sleep
+# undef sleep
+# endif
You can undef it without having
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-09
21:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: in bsi_after_labels, at
tree-flow-inline.h:758
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09
21:50 ---
The testcase starts
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-09-04
04:07 ---
Subject: Re: Binaries generated by arm-linux-gcj segfault on execution on arm
target
On Sep 3, 2005, at 11:25 PM, ngmlinux at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
20:01 ---
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
On Aug 29, 2005, at 3:59 PM, jacob dot navia at ants dot com wrote:
OK?
Should we file a new bug report?
Yes but this is most likely PR 23167
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
21:32 ---
Subject: Re: Typeinfo comparison code easily breaks shared libs
On Aug 29, 2005, at 5:27 PM, mmarcus at emarcus dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From mmarcus at emarcus dot org
2005-08
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
23:01 ---
Subject: Re: -Wsign-compare and const propagation
On Aug 29, 2005, at 6:24 PM, br1 at internet dot com dot uy wrote:
--- Additional Comments From br1 at internet dot com dot uy
2005-08-29 22
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-28
23:32 ---
Subject: Re: java.lang.String.equals is suboptimal
On Aug 28, 2005, at 7:25 PM, greenrd at greenrd dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org
2005-08-28 23:25
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
05:19 ---
Subject: Re: Missed ccp optimization
On Aug 29, 2005, at 1:18 AM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-29 05:18
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
14:24 ---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring make
On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Nathan M wrote:
do build it this way: gcj HelloWorld.java --main=HelloWorld -g -o
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
18:37 ---
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
--- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-26
18:31 ---
Subject: RE: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-25
15:53 ---
Subject: Re: nonoverlapping_memrefs_p returns true even for overlapping memory
references
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25
15:47
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
04:26 ---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring make
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 04:24
---
Bug reopened
You did not read
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-24
23:35 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr18122.f90
On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:26 PM, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-24 23:26
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-23
18:07 ---
Subject: Re: bigger version of mov + cmp produced
On Aug 23, 2005, at 2:06 PM, dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
wrote:
--- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-22
18:26 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on correct code
On Aug 22, 2005, at 2:18 PM, paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
PS peshtigo?
I don't know where it comes from for this machine, as I did not name
them.
It looks
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
18:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: vector::clear should be manually inlined
vector::clear calls erase(begin(), end()), which has an unnecessary call to
memmove, in addition to a function call overhead. The fix
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
20:07 ---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ fails to link with std::string on AIX
--- Additional Comments From appfault at hotmail dot com 2005-08-16
20:03 ---
I compiled 4.0.1 using 'make bootstrap
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
21:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: Operations involving unsigneds could be simplified
This could just return 1.
$ cat unsigned-arith.c
int foo(unsigned int *a, unsigned int *b, unsigned int *c)
{
unsigned
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
21:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in cgraph_decide_inlining_incrementally
(using freed GC memory)
--- Additional Comments From e9925248 at stud4 dot tuwien dot ac dot at
2005-08-16 21:20
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-15
12:09 ---
Subject: Re: alignment bug in libobjc/archive.c
--- Additional Comments From rassahah at neofonie dot de 2005-08-15
10:41 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Hmm on powerpc-darwin we get
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-13
21:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:42 PM, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-14
03:48 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] tree-ssa-alias creates a new virtual variable
for malloc each time may_alias is run (HEAP)
On Aug 13, 2005, at 11:40 PM, dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote:
Uh, so?
We
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-11
17:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Wrong code from forwprop
On Aug 11, 2005, at 1:43 PM, rguenth at tat dot physik dot
uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
because else we might get f.i. LE_EXPR passing through
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-12
02:14 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vectorT,
std::vectorT)
--- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-12 02:10
---
(In reply to comment #79
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-12
02:38 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vectorT,
std::vectorT)
On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:32 PM, adah at netstd dot com wrote:
What I have not is that a PRoblem resulting from
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-09
13:40 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vectorT,
std::vectorT)
This is reasonable. That was why I thought it was not necessary to `fix'
this
bug after some discussions. I
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-10
02:49 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vectorT,
std::vectorT)
On Aug 9, 2005, at 10:41 PM, adah at netstd dot com wrote:
Passing this information to the user is difficult
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-05
01:35 ---
Subject: Re: New: Invalid %sil register chosen when dereferenced pointer used
in inline asm with -O0
On Aug 4, 2005, at 8:32 PM, ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au
wrote:
/* this one doesn't
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-02
14:32 ---
Subject: Re: Improve documentation on -fprofile-generate, -fprofile-use
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:25 AM, anton at samba dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From anton at samba dot org 2005-08
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-01
18:34 ---
Subject: Re: MAXPATHLEN usage in fortran/{scanner,module}.c
On Aug 1, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:46:17PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
org wrote:
Well
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-31
16:56 ---
Subject: Re: [Bug gcov/profile/12786] -fvpt does not work with signed mod or
signed divide with a constant negative number
--- Additional Comments From veksler at il dot ibm dot com 2005-07
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-31
18:57 ---
Subject: Re: building GCC 3.3.6 fails on ppc64 with gcc4 and gcc4.1
$ touch ../gcc-3.3.6/gcc/c-gperf.h (don't know why this done by the way..)
$ make all-target-libstdc++-v3
LIBPATH=/usr/lib/gcc
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-26
20:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] wrong alias information causes an incorrect
redundant load elimination
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26
20:04
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-24
15:13 ---
Subject: Re: ICE / ada / error in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:557
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-24 15:10
---
with pinskia1.patch bootstrap gcc
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-23
22:54 ---
Subject: Re: ICE / ada / error in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:557
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-23 22:45
---
detailed backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-20
19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to
.rodata section?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-11
14:17 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3142
On Jul 11, 2005, at 6:47 AM, reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Do you want to add this as a testcase, since the one in PR22356
only triggers
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-05
17:13 ---
Subject: Re: Many attribute directive ignored warnings during Tru64 UNIX Ada
bootstrap
--- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 17:11
---
Richard, maybe you
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-05
17:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when
unwind.h is not installed
On Jul 5, 2005, at 10:19 AM, pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
The other alternative is ada
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-27
16:53 ---
Subject: Re: numeric_limitssigned::is_modulo is inconsistend with gcc
On Jun 27, 2005, at 12:25 PM, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
| Actually it is modulo for all operations
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-24
15:42 ---
Subject: Re: New: #if #A == #B should have a diagnostic
On Jun 23, 2005, at 10:04 PM, geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
GCC quietly accepts the following:
#define A a
#define B a
#if #A == #B
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-22
19:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2506
On Jun 22, 2005, at 2:59 PM, bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bkoz
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-21
20:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
On Jun 21, 2005, at 4:43 PM, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bangerth
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-20
17:48 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] register window not preserved after
getcontext call
On Jun 20, 2005, at 1:46 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-21
22:32 ---
Subject: Re: wrong-code with inlining and type-punned pointer
On May 21, 2005, at 6:28 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-05-21
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-18
21:00 ---
Subject: Re: no folding back to ARRAY_REF
On May 18, 2005, at 4:51 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com
2005-05-18 20:51
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-16
20:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl
On May 16, 2005, at 4:28 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-16
21:07 ---
Subject: Re: Strange symbols printed all over the error messages
On May 16, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Yuri wrote:
Agree, I must have wrong setting.
But how does compiler with US English languege benefit
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-14
07:04 ---
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
On May 14, 2005, at 3:00 AM, corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
* f95 disqualifies ifselves from several
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-14
07:08 ---
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
On May 14, 2005, at 3:00 AM, corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
* f95 disqualifies ifselves from several
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-05
18:41 ---
Subject: Re: wrong-code with inlining and type-punned pointer
On May 5, 2005, at 1:19 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-05-05
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-05
20:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates
unaligned access exception
On May 5, 2005, at 4:03 PM, tsv at solvo dot ru wrote:
I am trying to find out where unaligned
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-02
05:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file
from kdebindings
On May 1, 2005, at 11:33 PM, belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
wrote:
(though profile says
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-04-24
18:10 ---
Subject: Re: Generates unneeded test
On Apr 24, 2005, at 2:06 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
What is the type of 'i'? If it's unsigned, then we would be
wasting our time.
It is signed, otherwise i 0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-04-15
00:49 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.0 RC1] Bootstrap failure (ld: TOC overflow)
On Apr 14, 2005, at 8:45 PM, ltg at zes dot uni-bremen dot de wrote:
I tried to build gcc-4.0.0-20050410 (RC1) and got the following
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-04-12
16:19 ---
Subject: Re: unrolling does not take target register pressure into account.
On Apr 12, 2005, at 12:14 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-29
07:24 ---
Subject: Re: INQUIRE incorrectly reports the existence of UNITS
On Mar 29, 2005, at 2:13 AM, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
-*ioparm.exist = (u != NULL);
+*ioparm.exist = (u
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-20
00:46 ---
Subject: Re: Error compiling jdtcore.jar on powerpc
I had meant -mlongcall.
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20561
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-15
18:50 ---
Subject: Re: No proper linkage created for in class initialized static const
On Mar 15, 2005, at 1:46 PM, dopheide at fmf dot nl wrote:
It stills /looks/ inconsistent though.
That is because
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-11
22:41 ---
Subject: Re: pessimization of complex expression
On Mar 11, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-08
03:18 ---
Subject: Re: The missed-optimization of general induction variables in the new
rtl-level loop optimizer cause performance degradation.
On Mar 7, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
pinskia
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-07
01:39 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc execution test
On Mar 6, 2005, at 8:31 PM, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
wrote:
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-03-03
12:58 ---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20280] hoist indirect_ref out of addressable cond_exprs
On Mar 3, 2005, at 2:50 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
I'm bootstrapping this on x86_64-linux-gnu, along with the patch
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-02-17
20:05 ---
Subject: Re: x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:35 PM, gary at intrepid dot com wrote:
The MAX_FIXED_REC_SIZE defintion is a relatively recent addition to
config
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-02-10
03:45 ---
Subject: Re: Operation not supported while installing 4.0.0 on
apple-darmin-7.6.0.
On Feb 9, 2005, at 10:08 PM, peter at pogma dot com wrote:
and that darwin's as has a write_object.c which
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-01-24
21:47 ---
Subject: Re: computed gotos are not folded back to regular gotos when it is
found that they are not computed gotos at all
On Jan 24, 2005, at 4:37 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
Out of curiosity
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-01-04
21:40 ---
Subject: Re: Bootstrap ignores compiler flags supplied on command line
On Jan 4, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
gcc -c -g -DENABLE_CHECKING -DENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DIN_GCC -W
-Wall
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-01-05
00:22 ---
Subject: Re: --disable-checking doesn't fully disable checking
On Jan 4, 2005, at 7:19 PM, gschafer at zip dot com dot au wrote:
- C only bootstrap times on GCC-4 have almost exactly doubled since
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-12-29
14:58 ---
Subject: Re: A derived template cannot access base templat e members without
using this
On Dec 29, 2004, at 9:54 AM, Amos Ortal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for your fast reply, I saw the entry
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-12-28
22:34 ---
Subject: Re: Error messages seem to be printed slower
On Dec 28, 2004, at 5:31 PM, schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de wrote:
The call to setvbuf switches to line buffering, meaning that stderr
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-11-03 15:08
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] jump threading on trees is slow with switch statements
with large # of cases
On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
With loop bounds recording no longer
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-04 18:18
---
*** Bug 11767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11730
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11606
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11523
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11434
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-07 17:13
---
The problem with 3.3 and AIX 4.3.3 has been fixed for 3.3.1, can you try a snapshot?
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7123
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
