[Bug bootstrap/43900] ICE in dbxout.c

2010-08-21 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #7 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-08-21 09:08 --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) As it turns out, the ICE only manifests in a parallel build. I tried make -j 8, my default

[Bug bootstrap/43900] ICE in dbxout.c

2010-04-27 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #5 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-04-27 13:15 --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) As it turns out, the ICE only manifests in a parallel build. I tried make -j 8, my default and make -j 3. For an ordinary make there is no issue. So

[Bug bootstrap/43900] New: ICE ind dbxout.c

2010-04-26 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC host triplet: i686-w64-mingw32

[Bug bootstrap/43900] ICE in dbxout.c

2010-04-26 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #1 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-04-26 18:27 --- I'm still analyzing, what's going wrong here, it's a strange thing. I tried the build three times with a parallel make resulting in the above ICE. But can't reproduce it by compiling dbxout.c on the command line

[Bug bootstrap/43900] ICE in dbxout.c

2010-04-26 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #2 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-04-26 19:53 --- As it turns out, the ICE only manifests in a parallel build. I tried make -j 8, my default and make -j 3. For an ordinary make there is no issue. So, I'm curious how to handle this. Any thoughts? Rainer

[Bug libstdc++/42847] [4.5 Regression] failure while configuring libstdc++

2010-02-01 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #5 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-02-01 21:46 --- (In reply to comment #3) I haven't tried a whole lot of cross compiler building. There's no reference to cygwin anywhere in crossconfig.m4, so perhaps we need --with-newlib? Sorry guys, my fault. Indeed I

[Bug libstdc++/42847] New: [4.5 Regression] failure while configuring libstdc++

2010-01-22 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
++ Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: x86_64

[Bug libstdc++/42847] [4.5 Regression] failure while configuring libstdc++

2010-01-22 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #1 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-01-22 16:18 --- Created an attachment (id=19695) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19695action=view) libstdc++ config.log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42847

[Bug libstdc++/42847] [4.5 Regression] failure while configuring libstdc++

2010-01-22 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #4 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2010-01-22 20:16 --- (In reply to comment #3) I haven't tried a whole lot of cross compiler building. There's no reference to cygwin anywhere in crossconfig.m4, so perhaps we need --with-newlib? The identical setup works

[Bug target/42377] libstdc++.dll.a misses a definition of std::string::reserve

2009-12-18 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #11 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-18 10:02 --- (In reply to comment #10) Should be fixed in SVN now. Rainer, please verify when you get a chance. Today I will try to build a complete tool chain with shared libstdc++ enabled. I will report back

[Bug target/42377] libstdc++.dll.a misses a definition of std::string::reserve

2009-12-18 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #12 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-18 15:29 --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) Should be fixed in SVN now. Rainer, please verify when you get a chance. Today I will try to build a complete tool chain with shared libstdc

[Bug bootstrap/42400] objc build fails

2009-12-17 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #1 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-17 11:21 --- (In reply to comment #0) most likely the changes of 155302 are the cause. ../../gcc-4-5-libwork/gcc/objc/objc-act.c: In function ‘objc_substitute_decl’: ../../gcc-4-5-libwork/gcc/objc/objc-act.c:3118:14

[Bug c/40885] build_indirect_ref i18n problems

2009-12-17 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #4 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-17 11:22 --- (In reply to comment #3) Fixed for 4.5.0. This breaks bootstrap at stage 2 in objc/objc-act.c see PR42400, http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42400 -- rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de changed

[Bug libstdc++/42377] New: libstdc++.dll.a misses a definition of std::string::reserve

2009-12-15 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
::reserve Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet

[Bug target/42377] libstdc++.dll.a misses a definition of std::string::reserve

2009-12-15 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #2 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-15 14:25 --- (In reply to comment #1) Hi Rainer, it'll take a little time but I'll set myself up a build environment and see if I can reproduce this. The libtool dependency libs stuff is a known problem in libtool

[Bug bootstrap/40972] libtool fails to detect pe-x86-64 import library

2009-12-10 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #9 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-10 11:19 --- Indeed we need lt_cv_file_magic_cmd='func_win32_libid' as mentioned in comment #5! Without this the issue isn't solved! Rainer -- rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/40972] libtool fails to detect pe-x86-64 import library

2009-12-10 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #10 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-10 21:03 --- Sorry, my fault. It works! Rainer -- rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug preprocessor/41943] include search path composition is bogus

2009-12-04 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #5 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-12-04 08:24 --- Subject: Re: include search path composition is bogus -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb: --- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-03 21

[Bug c++/42137] error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before �{� token

2009-11-24 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #3 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-11-24 13:29 --- Confirmed. In file included from ../../../../../../../src/ppl-0.10.2/src/Box.cc:24:0: ../../../../../../../src/ppl-0.10.2/src/Grid_Generator_System.inlines.hh: In constructor »Parma_Polyhedra_Library

[Bug c++/42115] New: r154072 r154073 break build of ppl, non-placement deallocation issue

2009-11-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
deallocation issue Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet

[Bug c++/42115] r154072 r154073 break build of ppl, non-placement deallocation issue

2009-11-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #1 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-11-20 01:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19063) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19063action=view) preprocessed source, still quite large -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42115

[Bug preprocessor/41943] include search path composition is bogus

2009-11-07 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #3 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-11-07 11:04 --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) That is because the way you configured GCC with --with-sysroot=/mingw/test/sysroot Since that is true, it adds the sysroot to C:/MinGW/test/prefix

[Bug preprocessor/41943] New: include search path composition is bogus

2009-11-04 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: *-*-mingw32 GCC host triplet: *-*-mingw32 GCC target

[Bug tree-optimization/41750] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-29 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #20 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-29 12:37 --- (In reply to comment #19) I have downloaded binutils 2.20 and compiled the file on a native ia64 compiler. I have only managed to look at the dumps but so far could not see any problem there. I will have

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-20 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #12 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-20 18:04 --- First of all, it's nearly impossible to create a short self contained test case, at least for me. The function get_got in bfd/elf64-ia64.c shows the issue. Resolving the dependencies of this function is like

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-20 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #13 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-20 18:13 --- Created an attachment (id=18841) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18841action=view) preproccessed source no-ipa-sra, no-inline -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-20 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #14 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-20 18:14 --- Created an attachment (id=18842) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18842action=view) preproccessed source ipa-sra, no-inline -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-20 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #15 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-20 18:15 --- Created an attachment (id=18843) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18843action=view) assembler output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-20 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #16 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-20 18:16 --- Created an attachment (id=18844) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18844action=view) assembler output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug c/41750] New: gcc 4.50 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet

[Bug c/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #2 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 11:43 --- Subject: Re: gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb: --- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 11:00

[Bug c/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #3 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 11:51 --- Forgot to mention that's with binutils 2.20 and binutils head. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #5 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 14:46 --- works when build with -g -O0 and -g -O1. fails when build with -g -O2 and -g -O3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #7 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 16:08 --- Subject: Re: gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 15:21 --- Try also -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #8 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 16:19 --- fails when build with -g -O1 -fipa-sra. So, the ipa-sra pass causes the issue, no? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #9 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 16:30 --- build with -g -O1 -fipa-sra -fno-inline I get the following backtrace: Core was generated by `ia64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld --verbose --sysroot=/opt/devel/tec/setup/sys-root/Lin'. Program terminated with signal 11

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #10 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 17:06 --- The line numbers in the traceback in comment #9 are completly bogus. I had to upgrade my gdb to version 0.7. Now it looks much better: Core was generated by `ia64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld --verbose --sysroot=/opt

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-19 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #11 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-10-19 17:24 --- verified that compiling only bfd/elf64-ia64.c with -fno-ipa-sra is sufficient to get a working ia64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug target/41357] libgomp build fail

2009-09-15 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #2 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-09-15 11:23 --- I think it's the same issue for PR41357. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357

[Bug bootstrap/41308] New: build of libgomp fails with undefined reference to gomp_tls_data

2009-09-08 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC host

[Bug driver/39356] assembler isn't called

2009-08-31 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #18 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-08-31 08:11 --- Subject: Re: assembler isn't called -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb: --- Comment #17 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:35

[Bug driver/41024] New: driver passes wrong parameter to as

2009-08-10 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC host triplet: *-w64-mingw32 GCC target triplet: *-w64-mingw32 http

[Bug bootstrap/40972] New: libtool fails to detect pe-x86-64 import library

2009-08-05 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/40890] New: ICE in pre_edge_rev_lcm in stage 2

2009-07-28 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC target triplet

[Bug bootstrap/40890] ICE in pre_edge_rev_lcm in stage 2

2009-07-28 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #1 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-07-28 18:28 --- Doesn't reproduce, please close as invalid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40890

[Bug driver/39356] assembler isn't called

2009-07-22 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #15 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-07-22 12:24 --- Is there a chance that we get this fixed soon? Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39356

[Bug bootstrap/39610] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include in stage 3

2009-07-17 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #6 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-07-17 10:30 --- This doesn't show up anymore. Someone with appropriate permissions may close this PR. Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39610

[Bug bootstrap/39610] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include in stage 3

2009-04-06 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #5 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-04-06 08:53 --- This is a regression because it used to work for gcc-4.4.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39610

[Bug bootstrap/39610] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include in stage 3

2009-04-05 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #3 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-04-05 06:46 --- (In reply to comment #1) Can you configure with --disable-libstdcxx-pch and try again? Now I get in libstdc++-v3/src: libtool: compile: /home/rainer/software/build/i686-pc-cygwin/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/./gcc/xgcc

[Bug middle-end/39625] [4.5 regression] Revision 145338 breaks ability to build Ada

2009-04-05 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #19 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-04-05 22:18 --- (In reply to comment #18) Is there a supported platform currently using FE SJLJ? Windows. I confirm the exactly same issue for i686-pc-cygwin. And I think it is the same for the *mingw32 targets

[Bug bootstrap/39610] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include in stage 3

2009-04-02 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
--- Comment #2 from rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-04-02 12:05 --- (In reply to comment #1) Can you configure with --disable-libstdcxx-pch and try again? sure, in the evening. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39610

[Bug libstdc++/39610] New: ICE in libstdc++-v3/include in stage 3

2009-04-01 Thread rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de
Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc