https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90075
--- Comment #5 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ---
The main reason for the ICE is this bit of code here.
GCC-8 and earlier have this bit of code in the expansion for copysignsf3
..
rtx op2 = lowpart_subreg (V2SFmode, operands[2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #25 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 29/04/15 09:09, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #8 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 23/04/15 09:18, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #18 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 28/01/15 17:58, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #8 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 27/01/15 20:00, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #4 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 27/01/15 12:27, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503
--- Comment #20 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 23/10/14 00:28, e.menezes at samsung dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503
--- Comment #16 from Evandro e.menezes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61532
--- Comment #10 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 23/06/14 21:31, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61532
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #19 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 06/12/14 08:46, fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
Fredrik Hederstierna
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61153
--- Comment #8 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
How do we define cases where we need them? My concern is that some compiler
change might cause a suboptimal-yet-functional code to be generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Comment #9 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com 2010-10-14 16:39:26 UTC ---
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:33 +, stephen.clarke at st dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
11 matches
Mail list logo