http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
17:39:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
But isn't with
__transaction_atomic
{
for (i = 0; i 10; i++)
if (x[i])
x[i] += data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52141
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
17:15:41 UTC ---
It is a compiler error, because we're supposed to have handled
a transaction involving asms differently, earlier in compilation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
17:53:14 UTC ---
We were *supposed* to already be disallowing inlining of tm_pure
into non-tm_pure functions. At least that's what I remember...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24
17:33:46 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jan 24 17:33:41 2012
New Revision: 183480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183480
Log:
PR target/51968
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23
18:31:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26436
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26436
proposed patch
I'll run this through a cross-build first, but I expect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #16 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
21:40:22 UTC ---
Calls are especially problematic, yes. You've just fixed a bug
for branches; hopefully that's the last of them.
Though if it were a matter of preferences
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51655
--- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06
21:58:47 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Jan 6 21:58:44 2012
New Revision: 182972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182972
Log:
PR testsuite/51655
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51743
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05
00:31:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
These tests just shuffle bytes around, so I was under impression that the
functionality is isolated from OS. And Hello world
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #16 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05
01:35:29 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 5 01:35:25 2012
New Revision: 182899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182899
Log:
PR bootstrap/51072
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05
02:25:10 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 5 02:25:04 2012
New Revision: 182900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182900
Log:
PR bootstrap/51072
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51743
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
20:11:43 UTC ---
Uh... can you even force ia64-linux to run in big-endian mode?
Just because you said -mbig-endian doesn't mean it is. I don't
see anything in the linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
17:18:11 UTC ---
As far as the compiler goes that all sounds plausible.
The main problem is that we would have to make libitm exception safe.
I'm 100% sure that won't work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-21
20:21:14 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Dec 21 20:21:00 2011
New Revision: 182604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182604
Log:
PR target/51552
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51552
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17
21:40:48 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Sat Dec 17 21:40:45 2011
New Revision: 182445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182445
Log:
Revert fix for PR bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-16
18:00:43 UTC ---
While that might solve the ICE, the clone table doesn't actually
get registered, which is why that clone-1 test case still fails.
You'll need to play
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17
00:07:17 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Sat Dec 17 00:07:10 2011
New Revision: 182424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182424
Log:
PR bootstrap/51072
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51503
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12
18:10:10 UTC ---
Odd. I thought this was supposed to happen automatically with
lang_env_dependencies = { module=libitm; cxx=true; };
in Makefile.def.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51273
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-01
17:46:35 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Dec 1 17:46:32 2011
New Revision: 181887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181887
Log:
PR middle-end/51273
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-27
18:59:40 UTC ---
You don't. We're supposed to prevent frame-related insns
from appearing in branch delay slots.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51074
--- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22
16:08:17 UTC ---
No, Jakub, vector elements are in memory order. There is no adjustment
to be made here.
Unfortunately ppc represents its interleave patterns non-standard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21
19:41:16 UTC ---
The quoted test ought to have worked for i386-solaris.
If one of those predicates is wrong (e.g. is-effective-target ia32)
then there are other tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-19
19:29:22 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Sat Nov 19 19:29:18 2011
New Revision: 181512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181512
Log:
PR middle-end/51211
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-17
22:52:45 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-11/msg00160.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
01:38:53 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Nov 18 01:38:48 2011
New Revision: 181465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181465
Log:
PR libstdc++/51181
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-14
23:50:59 UTC ---
... which will not be declared if AVX support is disavowed.
... except that the configure was --with-arch=corei7-avx.
If true, the problem is user error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51065
Bug #: 51065
Summary: Forwarding functions can be optimized to aliases
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09
18:09:45 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Nov 9 18:09:42 2011
New Revision: 181223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181223
Log:
PR libfortran/47972
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51031
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17
17:02:12 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:02:05 2011
New Revision: 180100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180100
Log:
PR 50746
* optabs.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50728
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10
16:51:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Git bisect points to Rev179701:
...
Rename vshuffle/vec_shuffle to vec_perm.
* doc/extend.texi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07
15:35:56 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Oct 7 15:35:49 2011
New Revision: 179663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179663
Log:
PR 49752
* fold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34888
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50632
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50632
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-06
19:15:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 25433
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25433
proposed patch
Testing this patch now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25430|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50632
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-06
22:22:15 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Oct 6 22:22:11 2011
New Revision: 179637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179637
Log:
PR 50632
* combine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50132
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50632
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50132
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25
18:57:53 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 25 18:57:48 2011
New Revision: 178084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178084
Log:
PR 50132
PR 49864
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49864
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-25
18:57:53 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 25 18:57:48 2011
New Revision: 178084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178084
Log:
PR 50132
PR 49864
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49864
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-24
19:35:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 25091
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25091
followup patch
I think you'd have been better off opening a new bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50132
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-15
17:39:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 25020
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25020
second patch
Two similar, but not really identical, problems.
S390x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
--- Comment #12 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-15
17:44:19 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Aug 15 17:44:11 2011
New Revision: 177764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177764
Log:
PR middle-end/50006
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12
21:00:17 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 12 21:00:00 2011
New Revision: 177721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177721
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49994
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12
21:49:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 24993
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24993
proposed patch
This seems to fix the bug. Doing an Ada sanity check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50018
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11
15:09:35 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 11 15:09:30 2011
New Revision: 177669
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177669
Log:
PR bootstrap/50018
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50018
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11
23:54:57 UTC ---
Tricky stuff, this.
The ICE is, for the most part, valid. The transformation that
is being done in -fsched2-use-superblocks is invalid, from the
point
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50018
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11
00:20:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 24974
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24974
proposed patch
It fixes the given test case. I'll sanity check on i686.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50018
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50006
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
15:15:47 UTC ---
Ah, thank you reload for silly intermediate states. But at least
it gets cleaned up afterward. So, yes, your fix is correct.
But I'd prefer a slight
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
16:12:22 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:12:16 2011
New Revision: 177464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177464
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49982
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49982
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
16:17:20 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:17:13 2011
New Revision: 177465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177465
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49977
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
16:17:54 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Aug 5 16:17:46 2011
New Revision: 177466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177466
Log:
PR rtl-opt/49977
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
16:18:57 UTC ---
Fixed? Dave, if this works for you on pa, please close.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #18 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
17:33:05 UTC ---
Argh. The problem is that if we emit both
.ent / .frame / .mask / .end
notes and .cfi directives, the .cfi directives get ignored.
Thus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #19 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
17:44:43 UTC ---
Err, it's slightly more complicated than that.
We're emitting *both* a frame from .ent/.end *and* a frame from .cfi.
The later has the personality info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688
--- Comment #20 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-05
19:04:20 UTC ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-08/msg00052.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
15:39:43 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 4 15:39:40 2011
New Revision: 177404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177404
Log:
PR middle-end/49968
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
15:47:50 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 4 15:47:42 2011
New Revision: 177408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177408
Log:
PR target/49964
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04
19:50:03 UTC ---
David, most of those c++ tests require system headers to compile,
but g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb31.C does not.
Except that I don't see any changes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03
18:00:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 24908
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24908
proposed patch
I believe this will solve the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49968
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03
19:11:48 UTC ---
It's a bug in the i386 backend:
(call_insn 28 27 136 2 (parallel [
(parallel [
(call (mem:QI (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 73
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24910|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34888
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03
22:57:25 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Aug 3 22:57:22 2011
New Revision: 177300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177300
Log:
PR target/34888
501 - 600 of 781 matches
Mail list logo
