https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 62173
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
If a and b are side-effect-free, pure-boolean expressions then `a b' and `a
b' are completely equivalent and there is no reason to generate different
code for them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29192
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yongjin.ohn at lge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
I don't really see why the trouble making the mental connection from the
void cast with the coder's intent do discard that result. Could it mean
anything else really?
The C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66351
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Yes, it does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66497
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66428
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||singhai at gcc dot
...@linux-m68k.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib-42.c
-Bx86_64-linux/libgomp/ -Bx86_64-linux/libgomp/.libs -Ix86_64-linux/libgomp
-I../gcc/include -I../gcc/libgomp -fopenacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Fixes the test case on m68k.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 65443
Target Milestone: ---
Target: m68k-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66423
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
ITYM a ((1 b) - 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66428
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66351
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-06/msg00430.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 48052
Target Milestone: ---
Target: m68k-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: ia64-*-*
Created attachment 35658
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*
$ gcc/xg++ -Bgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
linux/aio_abi.h was added in 2.5.32.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=ea5097be4e814a2a9457e60653052306295941e8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Format it as a hexadecimal number.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Are you sure their user-space kernel headers are at 2.6.9 level?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=31a3791056e43c6dd7386b8bc0f5fb94848c5a61
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: miyuki at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This fixes the ICE both on aarch64 and m68k.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Created attachment 35589
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35589action=edit
pr34999.gcda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The profile files differ in a few bytes.
9 17 ^O 265 M-5
10 217 M-^O 44 $
11 323 M-S 301 M-A
12 166 v165 u
21 146 f376 M-~
22 213 M-^K 233 M-^[
23 166 v 32 ^Z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
After, = 32 triggers assert (-- failure).
This is backwards. The failure case is sizeof (hashval_t) * CHAR_BIT 32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66110
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Since typedef does not create a new type the effect of uint8_t is exactly the
same as the type it is defined from. Thus if uint8_t is defined from unsigned
char then uint8_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66088
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The modification cannot be observed outside of the function, thus removing the
assignment would not change the behaviour of the whole program.
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: law at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: m68k-*-*
Created attachment 35511
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #36 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the
whole email, or wait for the completion to appear and select it.
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org, vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
What collect2 is looking for is configured during build, see the gcc/collect-ld
script in the build directory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-2.c -O2
-fprofile -mprofile-kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Also fails on powerpc{-m32,-m64}.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Also fails on ia64.
$ grep --color hooray iinline-attr.c.062i.inline
Analyzing function: hooray/0
Analyzing function body size: hooray
Inline summary for hooray/0 inlinable
hooray
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65981
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65898
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Program aborted. Backtrace:
#0 0x3FF95D8B973
FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_9.f90 -O execution test
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: m68k-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ -O1 -fdump-tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
I don't think this has anything to do with the timezone of the commenter. For
example the mail for comment #19 has the date Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:28:19 +
(which is correct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65774
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
wi::sext has undefined behaviour with offset == 0.
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64-*-*
This was broken by r222085.
(gdb) r -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Worksforme.
$ objdump -T usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 | grep bad_function_callD
000e7a90 gDF .text 0050 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
))
(0x3ffb49, 0x8)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: dodji
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65601
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/editkeywords.cgi?action=add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Actually I'm using gcc since about 2.6 version and I cannot recall any tool
that understands these In file included from messages.
Emacs has always handled them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65268
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65267
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
*** Bug 65268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
It wasn't that way when reported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65160
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
*** Bug 65160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
It's a restriction of the selector expression parser.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The first patch works without regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg02066.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
I've accidentally tested with both patches applied, will try again with only
the first one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This has the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
before:
2170: 02 38 01 02 00 24 [MII] addl r39=0,r1
2170: GPREL22 .sdata+0x38
after:
2170: 02 38 01 02 00 24 [MII
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
It doesn't bootstrap though:
ada/ali.o: In function `ali__alis__reallocate':
ali.adb:(.text+0x2170): relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 against `.rodata'
ada/ali.o: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This works as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hjl at gcc dot gnu.org, rth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
c9f03f9b6e7a888a270638c07190513189f8c33d
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c -mcpu=power7
-O2 -S -m64 -o atomic-p7.s
$ grep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64862
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
glibc has this in wchar.h:
extern int wprintf (const wchar_t *__restrict __format, ...)
/* __attribute__ ((__format__ (__wprintf__, 1, 2))) */;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||friend1992friend1992
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64800
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64808
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
How often does that occur in real life?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The original test case is already using the equivalent of a.buf1[4], without
any intermediate variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64714
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Created attachment 34520
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34520action=edit
Testcase
From the glibc testsuite.
$ gcc-4.9 -O2 fortify.i
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Created attachment 34519
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34519action=edit
Testcase
From the glibc testsuite.
$ gcc-4.9 -O2 fortify.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
*** Bug 64714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64703
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
A conversion between an integer type and a pointer type is
implementation-defined, not undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Why does libbacktrace need debug info? All required unwind information is
included in the binary. Glibc's backtrace can do that too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
But it shouldn't crash the app if you don't have the full information.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
According to http://golang.org/cmd/cgo/ cgo isn't supposed to be called
directly, but only via go tool cgo. But the version suffix will probably break
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64567
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This transformation is incorrect if the lvalue may be pointing to a read-only
object.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64417
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The glibc sources never contained such an array of incomplete type. The
example in bug28865#c3 has nothing to do with glibc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
It is using truncsiqi2, but that pattern hasn't been adjusted for coldfire.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The easiest fix is to disable the three trunc patterns for the coldfire.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64470
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64417
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
--- Comment #1
701 - 800 of 1456 matches
Mail list logo
