https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96212
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
After running on a few more machines this appears to be a BE only issue.
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:fff15bad1ab571906c37b88380431768d917dcb0, r11-2101
make -k check-target-libgomp RUNTESTFLAGS=fortran.exp=libgomp.fortran/alloc-3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96198
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
Host|
: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:f418bd4b92a03ee0ec0fe4cfcd896e86e11ac2cf, r11-2077
PASS: libgomp.c/loop-21.c (test for excess errors)
. . .
Execution
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:bc484e250990393e887f7239157cc85ce6fadcce, r11-205
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041
--- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer ---
It hits that breakpoints many times and for the first many it was always 0.
Then I just let it run until it ICEd and backed up the call stack a bit.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
I think this will work but haven't had a chance to try it except on the one
power 7 system.
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c
index 817a14c9c..37eb31222 100644
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:b88744905a46be44ffa3c57d46080f601ae832b8, r11-1792
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:d5d9f7834ab809841c4ccc90bca74808b4bcaf8d, r11-1782
FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/simd-15.c (internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96014
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Also these failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-69078-1.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL:
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:75ff24e1920ea6b198350a2961e23175e6108e75, r11-1697
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=analyzer.exp=g++.dg
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:f48bffe70cba310461ec19ffcd07c573a6b86575, r11-1654
gfortran.dg/char4-subscript.f90 works fine on powerpc64 LE but fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:86ce59b4f05d8f68ec4d9a14a7732acb370412db, r11-1647
Saw this on powerpc64 both BE and LE.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:d2adb79eac663874593a28387db593fb4bb2995f, r11-1649
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8, r9-8693
This same error occurs on both gcc 8 and 9. Bad backport maybe?
commit 84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8
Author: Harald
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:abcde0a658e17dbbabcb396eaae5a3612e07d401, r11-1595
make -k check-gcc
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:5acc654e380797bbf402bc3a0a67f9a6ac4c2a83, r11-1517
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f, r11-1445
This also appears to break bootstrap for powerpc64
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/5-11.c -O0 (internal compiler er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
No idea, sorry. Is that the problem? Supposed to be an error but on a
different line?
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:92bed036098928cd4659c8990e14cf7ad040e0c2, r11-1350
Note: I only saw this on powerpc64 LE systems, not BE.
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g
: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a97e49a89d11b302b12ec319a3316ba78adca02a, r11-1349
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95662
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
OK. If you fix the other one I will try it and see if it fixes this, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:1396fa5b91cfa0b3708ec9df33c0bb84386081d6, r11-1146
Note: this may be related to pr95649.
I am seeing this on powerpc64 when building two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95628
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1, r11-1181
This appears to affect at the least all powerpc64 and AIX builds. Even basic
non-bootstrap ones.
libtool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95617
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
oops, thought I had included that:
wn-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the patch and it allowed me to build gcc on a power7 system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95595
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
OK, this will also fails on an LE system if I use --with-cpu=power7
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:b825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7, r11-959 and still occurring at
r11-1075
I see the following when doing a simple build (not even a bootstrap) of gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
bootstrap works with that patch
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:b825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7, r11-959
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
The combined patch cleans up the ICEs for both issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Nope, still fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer ---
I used the wrong patch file, sorry.
This patch did not apply cleanly to current trunk.
patching file gcc/fortran/decl.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 4285.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Oops, no, they are different. But this one works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer ---
The fortran.h patch (which looks to be the same one you asked about in pr95537)
works here:
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90
# of expected passes3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer ---
Still fails:
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
Running f951 directly via gdb on a power 9 LE system I see:
(gdb) run /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90
-quiet -dumpbase pr95090.f90 -dumpbase-ext .f90 -mcpu=power9 -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
Note that I did this run on a power 9 LE system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
The debug build did not ICE.
Going back to a normal build and running f951 in gdb I see:
(gdb) run /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90
-quiet -dumpbase equiv_11.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
The above is all the traceback a normal compiler build provided. I will try
building a debug version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Wait, perhaps this is the same as pr95530? It started with a different
revision, though.
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:d176184d98a00ab379ae5959aed1908a79995e6b, r11-594
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90
FAIL
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
There is still one that is failing:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "not profitable"
XPASS:
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:ee969a36d9887e1a3230fe3de2d398fd6c6dac49, r11-736
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-perm-char.c s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Also causes gcc.dg/vect/pr46126.c to ICE in the same spot.
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:e31cd607e999ca6ab47b7e65a7045b1594e4fba4, r11-689
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gcc.dg/vshift-5.c
FAIL: gcc.dg/vshift-5.c (internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Those are new ones. I will track down the source tomorrow morning if no one
else has in the meantime.
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a746f952abb78af9db28a7f3bce442e113877c9c, r11-611
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg-torture.exp=gcc.dg/torture/pr92088-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
I just tried on current trunk and these have cleared up now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #9 from Bill Seurer ---
It looks good in a test I just ran.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Here's a full list:
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler
> error)
> FAIL:
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
One example:
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
After r11-205 gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr69907.c fails during make check. I only see
this on a power 7.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a4b48fc47c3406b6f41be093c4615879b7006710, r11-478
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
It works for me, too, now. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
It was definitely r11-477. I see this causing an ICE when building gcc albeit
only on power 9.
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:573e5f0500968dcf4025b8fc0ae5fb367f9c70d9, r11-477
r11-476 worked fine.
While building the compiler:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag CXX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #21 from Bill Seurer ---
We can't modify the spec code but we can add "compatibility" options.
Shouldn't the if test make the compiler ignore the statement with the divide by
zero? It shouldn't ever be executed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #19 from Bill Seurer ---
There's some stuff above this in the module but this is the part that shows the
error and I think it contains all the declarations.
subroutine Z()
real(r8) :: cld(99,99)
real(r8) cldeps
parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #18 from Bill Seurer ---
I am still cutting down the code but this should answer the question about if
it really could be zero:
if (cldeps > 0) then
do k = k1,k2
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:f6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18, r11-345
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
git g:f884bef2105d748fd7869cd641cbb4f6b6bb, r11-349
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=gomp.exp=gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer ---
he patch works and has no further fallout that I see.
I will still try to extract something small from that big fortran function but
as I have not written any fortran code in more than 35 years it may take a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer ---
I don't know fortran and this appears to be part of a multi-thousand line
extremely complex function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #11 from Bill Seurer ---
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gfortran -c -o
module_ra_cam.fppized.o -I. -I./netcdf/include -I./inc -m64 -O0 -g3
-mcpu=power8 -Wno-deprecated-declarations -fconvert=big-endian -std=legacy
: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the update on the spec 2000/2006 tests that were ICEing before and they
compile now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95064
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
CC|
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Several of the spec 2000 test cases (specifically ) ICE when being built now.
Errors are occurring in a couple of different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
And for the power 7 specific one (the other one also occurs on power 7)
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer ---
Created attachment 48509
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48509=edit
dump file p7 specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
Created attachment 48508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48508=edit
dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "not profitable"
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "BB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
this run: g:bc484e250990393e887f7239157cc85ce6fadcce, r11-205:
This occurs on all powerpc 64 targets:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
this run: g:f8a4141bae53f9125d374e5873dcda3f75392f1f, r11-169
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94974
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
This only happens on power 7 BE. Didn't see it on power 8 BE.
this run: g:308bc496884706af4b3077171cbac684c7a6f7c6, r11-59: 127 failures
FAIL
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
commit g:78b9783774bfd3540f38f5b1e3c7fc9f719653d7, r10-8012
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:9b8e9006bb35641865358e2df4f6b3ae185b239a, r10-7999
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94825
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
A bunch of the newly activated libphobos test cases fail on powerpc64. I saw
this on both BE and LE.
FAIL: libphobos.allocations/tls_gc_integration.d execution test
FAIL
: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
commit 619602346aed9dae3f338d9f18767414446adf78, r10-7850
Note I only saw this on powerpc64 LE.
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t032 cp_compat_x_tst.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #30 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried
-fno-inline-arg-packing
and with that the time to build all of spec2017 is 28m43 versus 63m to 65m
without.
For my purposes this is fine BUT will using this option have some sort of
performance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #29 from Bill Seurer ---
The suggestion above was to use -finline-arg-packing but I will try
-fno-inline-arg-packing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer ---
Is there some earlier report to which this is a follow-on? The first comment
here sort of implies that.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:892c755eae2e2e45547395013695fdd819c297fa, r9-8486
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-10b.c
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:33c45e51b4914008064d9b77f2c1fc0eea1ad060, r10-7665
FAIL: gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #15 from Bill Seurer ---
Martin, are you expecting this build to have 64 bit or 128 bit long doubles?
The default should be 128 as it is natively but for some reason the cross
compiler is using 64. Even with that, though, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94533
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|errors in new test case |errors in new test case
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:8bf5faa9c463f0d53ffe835ba03d4502edfb959d, r10-7632
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g: 2523d721cfc861a3abea6e97736446c99ba8b52d, r10-7552
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
