https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113898
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113898
Bug ID: 113898
Summary: ICE in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.cc:1156
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113756
Bug ID: 113756
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-2780-g39f117d6c87
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113725
Bug ID: 113725
Summary: ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112831
Bug ID: 112831
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in
type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6767
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112721
Bug ID: 112721
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O1/s on
x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-5831-gaae723d360c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111671
--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li ---
Yes, I cannot reproduce it anymore. Any idea about which commit fixed it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
--- Comment #5 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #3)
> I tried to bisect it and it was bisected to r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175, which is
> different from the bisection point in bug110641
I probably bisected to the wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112346
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112310
Bug ID: 112310
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-1161-g5476de2618f
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111950
Bug ID: 111950
Summary: ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250 since r14-4786-gd118738e71c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111917
Bug ID: 111917
Summary: ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:255 since GCC-8
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111869
Bug ID: 111869
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed since r14-4710-g60c231cb658
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111839
Bug ID: 111839
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r12-2097-g9f34b780b0
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111764
Bug ID: 111764
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r11-5965-g04bff1bbfc1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111671
Bug ID: 111671
Summary: ICE in get_default_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.cc:312
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111648
Bug ID: 111648
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-3243-ga7dba4a1c05
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111631
Bug ID: 111631
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-3217-g4d6132e5932
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
Bug ID: 111614
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE at -O2: verify_gimple failed since
r14-2282-gf703d2fd3f0
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109967
--- Comment #7 from Shaohua Li ---
This test case does not reproduce anymore on the current trunk. Maybe one of
the recent fixes fixed the underlying issue as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111583
Bug ID: 111583
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on
x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3281-g6cc3394507
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
Bug ID: 111572
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571
Bug ID: 111571
Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at
ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111519
Bug ID: 111519
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-455-g1fe04c497d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111514
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect r14-4192-g4d80863d7f93c0a839d1fe5 fixed this ...
I checked the commit r14-4192-g4d80863d7f93c0a839d1fe5, and it indeed fixed the
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111514
Bug ID: 111514
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in lower_bound, at
value-range.h:1078 since r14-3644-g1aceceb1e2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> Another ivopts issue.
>
> Note that if something is different with different -O levels it's almost
> never a "c" bug. The "c" in component only covers C frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111472
Bug ID: 111472
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111469
Bug ID: 111469
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-573-g69f1a8af45
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445
Bug ID: 111445
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r12-1077-g57bf3751511
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111444
Bug ID: 111444
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3/s on x86_64-gnu since
r14-3226-gd073e2d75d9
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111443
Bug ID: 111443
Summary: ICE : Segmentation fault signal terminated program
since r14-4038-gb975c0dc3be
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111422
Bug ID: 111422
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111414
Bug ID: 111414
Summary: ICE in verify_gimple failed since
r14-3719-gb34f3736356
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111408
Bug ID: 111408
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-2866-ge68a31549d9
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111389
Bug ID: 111389
Summary: ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111383
Bug ID: 111383
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r12-5138-ge82c382971
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111365
Bug ID: 111365
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111336
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yinyuefengyi at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111336
Bug ID: 111336
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3 since r14-2472-g14b10ff30ad
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111331
Bug ID: 111331
Summary: Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111328
Bug ID: 111328
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed since
r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111319
--- Comment #4 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> Please try not to create more reports with "not sure if there is UB" esp.
> this UB should be obvious, and it's also detectable with
> -fsanitize=undefined:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111319
Bug ID: 111319
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111303
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111303
Bug ID: 111303
Summary: ICE: in type, at value-range.h:869
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111256
Bug ID: 111256
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3/s since r10-1615-g75efe9cb1f8
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111233
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> (In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #0)
>
> > printf("%d\n", a);g
>
> I assume the "g" is a typo？
Oh, that's indeed a typo. Sorry for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111233
Bug ID: 111233
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-2852-gf5fb9ff2396
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111210
--- Comment #5 from Shaohua Li ---
Thanks for all your comments!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111210
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> 'c' is called with 'd' pointing to 'long e[2]', so
>
> return *(int *)(d + 1);
>
> is an aliasing violation (dereferencing a pointer to an incompatible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111210
Bug ID: 111210
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r12-4849-gf19791565d7
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37
Bug ID: 37
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3 since r12-1000-g6924b5e6bd3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28
Bug ID: 28
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111043
Bug ID: 111043
Summary: ICE in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1068
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111000
Bug ID: 111000
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r14-2944-g3d48c11ad08
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110929
Bug ID: 110929
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed since r14-2946-g46c8c225455
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110887
Bug ID: 110887
Summary: ICE: gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
signal terminated program cc1 since
r14-2925-g2bae476b511
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110753
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
Bisect to r14-2379-gc496d15954c, which was committed by @al...@redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110233
--- Comment #11 from Shaohua Li ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #10)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #8)
> > > I tried to bisect it and I bisected it to r12-4871-g502ffb1f389
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li ---
I tried to bisect it and it was bisected to r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175, which is
different from the bisection point in bug110641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110702
--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li ---
Bisect to r13-550-gebce0e9bd8d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110641
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
Bisect to r14-2230-g7e904d6c7f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
--- Comment #5 from Shaohua Li ---
Bisect to r12-1653-gcb448ade74d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110582
--- Comment #5 from Shaohua Li ---
Bisect to r14-1179-g1cd5bc387c4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243
--- Comment #6 from Shaohua Li ---
I tried to bisect it and it was bisected to r13-3875-g9e11ceef165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110233
--- Comment #8 from Shaohua Li ---
I tried to bisect it and I bisected it to r12-4871-g502ffb1f389
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110141
--- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li ---
I tried to bisect this case and I bisected it to r12-4790-g4b3a325f07a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110115
--- Comment #5 from Shaohua Li ---
I tried to bisect this case and I bisected it to r0-2686-gd119f34c952
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109967
--- Comment #6 from Shaohua Li ---
Bisected to r9-2635-g78ea9abc201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
--- Comment #52 from Shaohua Li ---
*** Bug 107257 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
Bug ID: 110769
Summary: ICE in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1023
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110753
Bug ID: 110753
Summary: ICE in meet_with_1, at ipa-cp.cc:1057
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110738
--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li ---
Would this test case be interesting? If no, I won't report other similar
issues.
https://godbolt.org/z/9xr1rv37s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110738
Bug ID: 110738
Summary: GCC trunk failed to do some optimizations since GCC-8
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110732
Bug ID: 110732
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (recent
regression)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110702
Bug ID: 110702
Summary: Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu (regression
since GCC-12.2)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
Bug ID: 110701
Summary: Wrong code at -O1/2/3/s on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110641
Bug ID: 110641
Summary: ICE in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1023
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
Bug ID: 110640
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since GCC-13
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110582
Bug ID: 110582
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110376
--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li ---
You post a commit for fixing this bug. Does this mean this report is not a DUP
of 110228?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110491
Bug ID: 110491
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (a recent
regression)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110376
Bug ID: 110376
Summary: Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110337
Bug ID: 110337
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/s on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
Bug ID: 110298
Summary: ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110286
Bug ID: 110286
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu
(nondeterministic output)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
Bug ID: 110252
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3/s on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110251
Bug ID: 110251
Summary: Hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243
Bug ID: 110243
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110233
Bug ID: 110233
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110141
Bug ID: 110141
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110115
Bug ID: 110115
Summary: Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109967
Bug ID: 109967
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109934
Bug ID: 109934
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109925
Bug ID: 109925
Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since GCC-12
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109778
Bug ID: 109778
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since GCC-12.2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108497
--- Comment #4 from Li Shaohua ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Not now nor in the near future. After all, it isn't a regression, so
> couldn't be fixed during stage4 anyway.
This bug affects GCC>=8. GCC<=7 work fine on this
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
