https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
--- Comment #6 from Sylwester Arabas ---
BTW, according to this gcc www entry, Blitz++ seems to listed as a part of GCC
test suite: https://gcc.gnu.org/testing/testing-blitz.html
Is this information up to date?
Was this issue somehow triggered
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl
Created attachment 33103
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33103action=edit
single .ii file that triggers the ICE
Hi,
Trying out current
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60267
--- Comment #13 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl ---
Just confirming it solved the problem with compilation of Blitz++ with the
ivdep pragmas.
Thanks,
Sylwester
P.S. Turning them on, causes a slowdown in this case, though :).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60267
--- Comment #7 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl ---
Created attachment 32172
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32172action=edit
preprocessed source trigerring ICE with g++ snapshot 20140212
Thanks a lot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60267
--- Comment #8 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl ---
BTW, I have initially reported it as a comment to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198 (the same file/line in ICE
error message).
S.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60267
--- Comment #12 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl ---
Thanks a lot! I'll try it as soon as it will get into Debian's gcc-snapshot
package.
Sylwester
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198
Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slayoo
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl
Hi All,
The Blitz++ library (http://sf.net/projects/blitz) contains some #pragma
ivdep macros intended
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198
--- Comment #4 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl ---
Here it is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60267
HTH,
Sylwester
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60267
--- Comment #2 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl ---
As I've mentioned, trying to use -save-temps results in another ICE and an
abruptly cut .ii file (last line ends with an unfinished #pragma). The .ii file
fails to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
Bug #: 57041
Summary: ICE in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:376 (with
dot-prefixed structure initialisation)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983
--- Comment #3 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2013-01-15
09:03:28 UTC ---
Hi Janus,
Re .f90 - it's not valid f90 code after all :)
Re missing use bcd_m - I was aware of this case, and I submitted the Bad
statement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983
Bug #: 55983
Summary: ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at
fortran/class.c:2711
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984
Bug #: 55984
Summary: ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
Bug #: 54940
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at
fortran/expr.c:4609
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880
--- Comment #2 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-10-12
09:48:12 UTC ---
Hi,
I've came across it after simply switching the order of module definitions in a
file (i.e. no preprocessor - I've used the preprocessor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #5 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-10-09
18:57:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 28404
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28404
testcase
The bug report got cluttered with non-relevant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880
Bug #: 54880
Summary: ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:4013
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
--- Comment #4 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-10-03
10:45:10 UTC ---
Thanks for your replies!
I've managed to get a vector of array pointers employing one more intermediate
derived type. The arrvec_t defined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
Bug #: 54778
Summary: an ICE on invalid OO code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
Bug #: 54788
Summary: ICE on pointer-array element assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54243
Bug #: 54243
Summary: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(trying to compile errorneous code)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54244
Bug #: 54244
Summary: f951: internal compiler error: in
gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:210
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31094
Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slayoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077
--- Comment #5 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-04-23
11:13:21 UTC ---
Thanks for quick replies.
Why can't you just pass the -cpp option to gfortran
if you want to enable the preprocessor?
Of course you can, but first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077
Bug #: 53077
Summary: suggestion to add the .f extension to the list of file
extensions that trigger enabling of the preprocessor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077
--- Comment #1 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-04-22
20:35:49 UTC ---
The gfortran-mp-4.6 vs. gfortran difference in the code above is not relevant
to the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077
--- Comment #2 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-04-22
21:36:33 UTC ---
Hmm... apparently the PGI compiler uses the same rule for enabling preprocessor
with .f and .F extensions. Then, if there's some important reason behind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
Bug #: 52994
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:6881
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #1 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-04-15
11:40:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 27159
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27159
Fortran source file with minimal example to reproduce the descibed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #3 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-04-15
19:28:22 UTC ---
pointer-valued (and dimensionful) type-bound procedure. Phew.
Thanks for the nice test case :)
That's what I've got trying to reimplement quite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #8 from Sylwester Arabas slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl 2012-04-15
20:23:18 UTC ---
Just out of curiosity: Are you aware of any compiler which swallows this?
No. I've just tried it with PGI (pgf95) but it chokes on contains within
32 matches
Mail list logo
