--- Comment #1 from tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp 2010-04-05
09:57 ---
I'm Sorry.
This binary file can be read correctly, by gdb-7.1.
Unlike gcc-3, the value of DW_OP_fbreg does not express the
offset of arguments from frame pointer directly.
--
tanaka at personal-media
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43439
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542
--- Comment #6 from tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp 2006-06-23
09:52 ---
Please answer my question again.
It can not be distinguished between a function, which specified
__inline__ and an another function, which is not specified __inline__,
after gcc-3.4.
This is sample
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp 2006-06-21
12:46 ---
Thanks for your reply.
Originally, my wanting to say is that
When compile a C source code only with an option -O2,
small function is not inlined.
But it is inlined by gcc-4.1.1.
Small function
--- Comment #5 from tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp 2006-06-22
03:28 ---
I home to confirm a conclusion.
That is to say, simple function is integrated into their callers when it
compiled with a option -O2, after gcc-3.4 isn't it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
