[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-14 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #9 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-14 15:39:56 UTC --- The problem should be fixed with 179991. Anyone running 32-bit architectures, please confirm.

[Bug middle-end/50716] New: Segmentation fault caused by misaligned vector access

2011-10-13 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716 Bug #: 50716 Summary: Segmentation fault caused by misaligned vector access Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tema at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #5 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:03:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #7 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:45:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) So if I want to run the test only on 64-bit architectures, then lp64 is the correct choice in dg

[Bug middle-end/50629] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vect-shuffle-2.c with ICE on ARM

2011-10-10 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50629 Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tema at gcc dot