--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 02:47 ---
I have a patch for this which just removes the sentence.
I'll submit shortly
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 03:29 ---
I tested this and it works. I'm submitting it.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 04:16 ---
The fix is simple -- change a single error() to a fatal().
I'll submit this after running the test suite.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28531
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29151
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 03:08 ---
I have a patch to document '#' and '@'.
I'll submit it shortly.
Currently gcc.c and invoke.texi are mostly kept in sync.
However I haven't audited to make sure they are fully in sync.
Adding support for \f
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 03:09 ---
I am testing a patch for this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 03:23 ---
One odd thing here is that if -Werror is given, then an inaccessible
directory will cause a compilation failure.
I would prefer we not check this patch in. I don't think there is
any obviously correct behavior
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 22:51 ---
This is an odd stack trace... it is hard to see how that code
could fail this way.
Perhaps building gcj without -O would help; I notice some other
oddities in the stack trace.
Also the date here is from before
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 22:57 ---
checking dependency style of gcc... none
This is a weird message (from comment #2 and comment #3).
It suggests to me that something else is going on -- something
unrelated to the original bug filed in this PR
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 22:59 ---
Is this still a bug?
I always build GCC with a separate objdir, and I don't see this problem.
Furthermore my 4.1 tree has a copy of config.{guess,sub} in libjava/libltdl.
I believe these are used by the libltdl build
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-20 01:22 ---
It looks as though your build is choosing sysdep/generic as the
sysdep dir. But, that is wrong, it should be choosing sparc.
I'll attach a patch; if you could try it that would be great.
Most likely, this patch
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-20 01:24 ---
Well, bugzilla would not let me make an attachment.
So, here it is inline.
Index: configure.host
===
--- configure.host (revision 120900
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-20 04:23 ---
I'm testing a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-20 06:19 ---
The patch in this PR looks correct to me.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-20 06:23 ---
I'm testing a patch to add -dD when -ggdb3 is passed.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 12:32 ---
The particularity of such expressions is that they are constants.
I've thought about this a bit but I don't have a real conclusion.
I don't know why this warning was added in the first place... it seems
like
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 13:56 ---
Unfortunately I still haven't been able to reproduce this.
I do have a few questions:
I'd like to see more of the build log, in particular what happened
before the failing command.
Does the failing gcj invocation
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 18:39 ---
I read through the existing code here and I think it is subtly correct.
The default_compilers array has a final entry consisting of all zeroes:
/* Mark end of table. */
{0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
'compilers
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug 27107
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Jan 17 22:14:48 2007
New Revision: 120878
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120878
Log:
PR libgfortran/27107:
* aclocal.m4, configure
--- Comment #17 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-17 01:32 ---
A flag to control the warning does not provide
fine enough granularity of control. That is, sometimes
the warning is appropriate, and disabling the warning
would let through code that you would prefer not to let
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-15 17:55 ---
How did you configure? Did you use make -j?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 19:47 ---
Subject: Bug 28227
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Jan 12 19:46:49 2007
New Revision: 120731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120731
Log:
libcpp
PR preprocessor/28227:
* directives.c
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 15185
Author: tromey
Date: Thu Jan 11 16:26:55 2007
New Revision: 120679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120679
Log:
PR preprocessor/15185, PR preprocessor/20989
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 20989
Author: tromey
Date: Thu Jan 11 16:26:55 2007
New Revision: 120679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120679
Log:
PR preprocessor/15185, PR preprocessor/20989
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 15:37 ---
The other bug has a proposed patch.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30424 ***
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 15:37 ---
*** Bug 30422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 18:06 ---
I have a patch to update the docs.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:55 ---
Hmm... you make a symlink tree instead of just running
configure from the readonly tree?
I thought we supported readonly trees.
Anyway, is cp -L portable?
that's the only question.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 18:46 ---
We already only support 'extern Java' classes where the body of the
class is written in Java and compiled with gcj. The reason for this is
that a Java class has a lot of required metadata which g++ does not know
how
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:37 ---
Andrew's fix for this went in with the merge.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #11 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #21 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:47 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks
501 - 600 of 1564 matches
Mail list logo
