--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-07 22:17 ---
On the gcj-eclipse branch, this works for me.
It correctly picks the bootstrap gcj.
However, this not not happening for Andrew Hughes...
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 21:35 ---
I'm testing a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 21:52 ---
Subject: Bug 28576
Author: tromey
Date: Sun Aug 6 21:52:04 2006
New Revision: 115976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115976
Log:
PR libgcj/28576:
* gnu/java/net
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 21:52 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 22:23 ---
Testing a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 22:43 ---
Subject: Bug 28491
Author: tromey
Date: Sun Aug 6 22:43:05 2006
New Revision: 115977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115977
Log:
PR libgcj/28491:
* configure, include
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 22:43 ---
Shouldn't we just pull in the fix from the gcj-eclipse branch?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 22:44 ---
Fix checked in on trunk.
This could be backported by someone if need be.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28579
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 16:29 ---
Yes, the current 'ecj1' driver translates gnu-style options to eclipse-style
options. So instead of funkyCaseWarning we have funky-case-warning, etc.
Also we accept some legacy warning names, -Wno-foo, and the like
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 21:14 ---
The forward declaration is kind of a hack. I'm not sure why it is needed.
In any case, no-threads is also a big hack.
It wouldn't hurt to simply change the _Jv_Thread_t there to a class.
--
tromey at gcc dot
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 21:58 ---
I'm fairly certain this is a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23682 ***
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 21:58 ---
*** Bug 26506 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 22:06 ---
I have a patch I'm testing.
This code in classpath looks quite bad :(
I fixed this problem by adding synchronization.
However, really very little synchronization should be needed.
Instead we could be doing something
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28453
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28454
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 23:56 ---
Subject: Bug 4105
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Jul 21 23:56:04 2006
New Revision: 115657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115657
Log:
PR libgcj/4105:
* java/lang/natClass.cc
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 15:12 ---
FWIW compiling from bytecode on svn head fails as well.
In fact the test case is xfailed in this case.
So this doesn't appear to be a regression.
Also I think this patch is bogus (but at least it shows the
right
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 17:21 ---
I suspect this was solved on the gcj-eclipse branch
by flushing the quick stack in some cases.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 19:07 ---
Fixed everywhere.
The fix for 4.2 went in on 2006-05-13 but wasn't marked with this PR number.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 17:00 ---
Subject: Bug 27271
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Jul 12 17:00:49 2006
New Revision: 115378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115378
Log:
PR libgcj/27271:
* java/util/zip/ZipFile.java
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 17:02 ---
Fix checked in.
It works with the test case from the PR.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 17:03 ---
This is no longer a problem.
I think the PR 27271 fix cleaned up the lingering problem.
(It is hard to be sure since this report is so vague...)
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 19:29 ---
testing a patch
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 20:01 ---
Subject: Bug 28329
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Jul 12 20:01:47 2006
New Revision: 115396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115396
Log:
PR java/28329:
* lang-specs.h: Pass '%U'-based
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 20:06 ---
Fixed on branch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-11 19:28 ---
%U implies %d
I debugged today and set a breakpoint in delete_if_ordinary.
I get this:
Breakpoint 1, delete_if_ordinary (
name=0x9af48c0 -fzip-dependency=/tmp/ccQurYQS.zip)
at ../../trunk/gcc/gcc.c:2349
So
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 00:24 ---
The bug here is that Inflater needs an extra input byte in some situations.
I think ZipFile has to provide this byte; a patch to do this makes this
test case work again. I need to investigate ZipInputStream
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-10 19:33 ---
I think Andrew Haley's commit to the gcj-eclipse branch fixed this.
I'm closing it and marking it as target == 4.3; presumably the ecj
merge will happen in that release.
Andrew Hughes -- if this still happens
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 28067
nThis:
http
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 00:05 ---
Any word on this?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 00:16 ---
I've seen this too... there's some other PR with a proposed
patch by Andrew Haley. I forget the number -- I'll try to find it later.
I don't recall why I'm not seeing it right now.
Perhaps because I'm building
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 00:19 ---
It is PR 19505.
The patch is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00425.html
I've been meaning to test this but haven't had a chance yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 15:30 ---
The mprec part of this patch looks fine to me.
This should go in Classpath as well as libgcj.
The timezone part of this patch looks odd.
I would expect that we would need another case in there
for __timezone -- both
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 15:33 ---
Subject: Bug 28178
Author: tromey
Date: Tue Jun 27 15:33:24 2006
New Revision: 115034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115034
Log:
PR libgcj/28178:
* jni.cc
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 28178
Author: tromey
Date: Tue Jun 27 15:42:22 2006
New Revision: 115035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115035
Log:
PR libgcj/28178:
* jni.cc
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 15:46 ---
I fixed this on the 4.1 branch and the trunk.
I'm not planning to backport to the 4.0 branch, but I would
approve it if someone wanted to.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 17:22 ---
Does the JDK's javah put that _ into the generated header?
I suspect that you are seeing a problem with the C compiler, not a problem
with JNI header generation.
In particular I think that _, most likely, should
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 03:20 ---
Yeah, jni.cc handles the lookup side of things.
The declaration side of things in user JNI code should be
handled by jni_md.h. It has a bunch of win32-specific code
which boils down to:
#define JNIIMPORT
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 18:01 ---
Subject: Bug 28089
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Jun 21 18:01:37 2006
New Revision: 114856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114856
Log:
PR java/28089:
* expr.c (expand_java_field_op
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 18:14 ---
Fix checked in on gcj-eclipse branch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:09 ---
I looked at this a little today.
The code does look wrong, but I couldn't write a simple test case
to make it fail. Do you have one?
One problem I see is that serve() uses the task's 'scheduled' field
without
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 17:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=11712)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11712action=view)
proposed patch
I've attached a proposed patch.
However, when I use this patch I run into PR 19505.
--
http
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 18:29 ---
Earlier I made a mistake and listed the bugs fixed by ecj
as dependencies; really this PR should block all the fixed-by-ecj
bugs and should depend on bugs that block the merge of the ecj branch.
--
tromey at gcc
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 21:34 ---
Checked in on the generics branch.
Note that the VM requires changes for this code to work.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28089
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28090
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 21:22 ---
I don't think we'll ever fix this.
GCC's -o option is probably sufficient.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28067
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 21:53 ---
My rewrite of gcjh in java fixes this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:59 ---
This was fixed for 4.2.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 01:01 ---
Fixed on the 4.1 branch and trunk.
AFAIK nobody is planning to backport to the 4.0 branch, so I'm closing.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 12:28 ---
Looks like classpath's configure uses the $(...) construct.
This isn't portable sh.
The fix is to replace with `...`
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 13:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28024
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Jun 14 13:46:33 2006
New Revision: 114637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114637
Log:
PR java/28024:
* aclocal.m4, configure: Rebuilt
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 13:56 ---
Subject: Bug 28024
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Jun 14 13:56:22 2006
New Revision: 114639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114639
Log:
PR java/28024:
* aclocal.m4, configure: Rebuilt
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 14:00 ---
Thanks for the report.
I fixed this problem. But, as I don't have a Solaris box,
I can't test whether this means that the build works.
Please update and try again :)
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 17:48 ---
I haven't looked at this since my last comment.
Your workaround is fine, you didn't break anything.
A real fix would have to work differently though.
Perhaps we should always compile these functions but just
have
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-09 17:09 ---
Teting a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-09 21:36 ---
Fixed.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-09 21:37 ---
Subject: Bug 27730
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Jun 9 21:37:32 2006
New Revision: 114524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114524
Log:
PR libgcj/27730:
* java/lang/Thread.java
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27921
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 14:08 ---
It looks to me that the code in link.cc is testing the wrong define.
It is testing USE_LIBFFI, but that is defined if any part of libffi is
in use. Instead it should be testing INTERPRETER -- ideally we'd add
a new
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 14:11 ---
Thanks for the report.
What should we use on this platform in place of setenv?
Or, if it has setenv, where is it declared?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 14:12 ---
Thanks for reporting this.
Offhand I suspect the problem is that we aren't building this
native code, and thus the checking script gets confused.
Probably we should disable these checks.
I will find out
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 14:23 ---
In this case won't the first failing FormatMessage change
the current error, so the next GetLastError will always
return the overwritten value? The MSDN docs seem to indicate
that if FormatMessage fails, you can use
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 15:09 ---
Subject: Bug 27818
Author: tromey
Date: Mon Jun 5 15:08:56 2006
New Revision: 114389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114389
Log:
PR gcc/27818:
* Makefile.in: Rebuilt
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 15:09 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 19:59 ---
Andreas -- yes, that patch looks good to me.
Please check it in. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27860
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 20:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=11598)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11598action=view)
patch to use putenv
Please try this patch.
If it works for you I will check it in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 20:06 ---
Installing in share -vs- lib is weird for libgcj.
Sometimes we install things in lib to be more jdk-like.
logging.properties has been there since 4.0, at least.
I don't have 3.x install trees around to check earlier
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 20:32 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 20:32 ---
Subject: Bug 27892
Author: tromey
Date: Mon Jun 5 20:32:33 2006
New Revision: 114410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114410
Log:
PR libgcj/27892:
* gij.cc (main): Use putenv
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 22:53 ---
Thanks Andrew. With this I'm able to BC compile ecj again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 13:38 ---
Method name:clinit static Signature: 70=()void
Attribute Code, length:58278, max_stack:7, max_locals:0, code_length:58266
Nice -- don't recall seeing a function that long before outside of jacks.
--
tromey
in update_aliases, at java/decl.c:192
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 14:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=11504)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11504action=view)
failing class file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 15:15 ---
Testing a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 17:14 ---
Subject: Bug 27731
Author: tromey
Date: Wed May 24 17:14:45 2006
New Revision: 114045
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114045
Log:
PR libgcj/27731:
* java/lang/natMath.cc (cbrt
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 17:21 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 17:22 ---
Subject: Bug 27729
Author: tromey
Date: Wed May 24 17:21:52 2006
New Revision: 114046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114046
Log:
gcc/java:
PR libgcj/27729:
* jcf.h
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 17:22 ---
Fix checked in.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 17:23 ---
I have a patch I'm testing.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 21:44 ---
Subject: Bug 27024
Author: tromey
Date: Wed May 24 21:44:34 2006
New Revision: 114056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114056
Log:
PR libgcj/27024:
* sources.am, Makefile.in
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 21:45 ---
Fixed in 4.2 now as well.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
801 - 900 of 1564 matches
Mail list logo
