[Bug fortran/111644] [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111644 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre

[Bug fortran/111644] [13 regression] many failures after r13-7923-gd9b3269bdccac2

Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Build|powerpc64-linux-gnu,| |powerpc64le-linux-gnu | --- Comment #1 from Andre Vehreschild --- Fails on all archs. Mistake identified and fixed. Will publish as soon as regression

[Bug fortran/102003] [PDT] Length of character component not simplified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102003 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 102003, which changed state. Bug 102003 Summary: [PDT] Length of character component not simplified https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102003 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/102003] [PDT] Length of character component not simplified

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Andre Vehreschild --- Created attachment 55514 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55514=edit First shot.

[Bug target/83670] [10/11/12/13 Regression] m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/107635] New: [Coarray] Allocatable components of types defined in module's interface are not handled correctly when used in coarrays.

Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 53881 --> https://gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103970] Multi-image co_broadcast of derived type with allocatable components fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103970 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103970] Multi-image co_broadcast of derived type with allocatable components fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103970 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Andre

[Bug fortran/103970] Multi-image co_broadcast of derived type with allocatable components fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103970 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild --- Waiting two weeks before backporting to gcc-11.

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andre

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 --- Comment #1 from Andre Vehreschild --- Created attachment 50853 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50853=edit Check for unset before assigning to stat.

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #11 from Andre

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 --- Comment #10 from Andre Vehreschild --- Created attachment 50674 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50674=edit Delta from Steve's patch to one submitted for acceptance to implement random_init for coarray=shared.

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Andre Vehreschild --- Going to implement the coarray part.

[Bug fortran/96418] Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from Andre

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 79097, which changed state. Bug 79097 Summary: coarray and pointer component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79097 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/79097] coarray and pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79097 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96418] Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Andre

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96737] ICE when compiling module and submodule in same file with debug (-g)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737 --- Comment #3 from Andre Vehreschild --- Sorry, I was in a hurry to post the pr. You're right one needs to specify '-g' to see the issue.

[Bug fortran/96737] New: ICE when compiling module and submodule in same file

Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Latest gfortran ICE with: 35 | end module | Error: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible constant 960> unit-size constant 120> al

[Bug fortran/93671] gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #6 from Andre

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/94958] gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:9797: possible typo ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93671] gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/93671] gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #19 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun May 6 12:33:07 2018 New Revision: 259979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259979=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-05-06 Andre Vehreschild <

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Revision: 259978 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Sun May 6 12:20:52 2018 -- --- svn:log

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Revision: 259978 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Sun May 6 12:20:52 2018 -- --- svn:log

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #18 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Revision: 259978 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Sun May 6 12:20:52 2018 -- --- svn:log

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun May 6 12:14:11 2018 New Revision: 259978 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259978=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild <

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun May 6 12:14:11 2018 New Revision: 259978 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259978=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #17 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun May 6 11:52:46 2018 New Revision: 259977 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259977=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-05-06 Andre Vehreschild <

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #16 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun May 6 11:19:31 2018 New Revision: 259974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259974=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-05-06 Andre Vehreschild <

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch is not referring to the failures in Opencoarrays. The fix for #56 is in Opencoarray's pull request #528. The other one has nothing to do with this initial issue and is not of my current

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > Thanks for the proposed bugfix. Did you check that also OpenCoarrays 2.0 > > compiles again with this fix? > > It d

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just now. OC 2.0 compiles fine with the proposed patch. I am just now working on getting the remaining get-send-issues fixed for gcc-8 in OC 2.0+.

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Candidate patch available here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-04/msg00120.html

[Bug fortran/85507] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/85507] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > The ICE is gone if I revert the change in dependency.c from r259385. > > This regtests cleanly. Well, it regtests cleanly,

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Apr 28 14:54:09 2018 New Revision: 259741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259741=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Apr 28 14:54:20 2018 New Revision: 259742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259742=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Apr 28 14:54:09 2018 New Revision: 259741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259741=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Apr 28 14:54:20 2018 New Revision: 259742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259742=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Backporting to gcc-6 and -7 is possible. The patch applies cleanly and all regression tests pass.

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 81773, which changed state. Bug 81773 Summary: [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Apr 14 14:45:59 2018 New Revision: 259385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259385=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-14 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Apr 14 14:45:59 2018 New Revision: 259385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259385=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2018-04-14 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 43451 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43451=edit Preliminary patch First shot on fixing the issue. At least for caf_get() it fixes the issue.

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 --- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 41952 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41952=edit Example producing the bug

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/81773] New: [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 41951 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41951=edit Dump Fortran code like:

[Bug fortran/80235] ICE: coarrays, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68800] Fortran FE produces many memory leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800 Bug 68800 depends on bug 79335, which changed state. Bug 79335 Summary: [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/79864] Implicit type conversion on assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable segfaults.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Depends

[Bug fortran/79864] New: Impl

dot gnu.org Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: ---

[Bug fortran/79863] Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable leads to access of unallocated memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/79863] New: Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable leads to access of unallocated memory

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following simple test code: integer, allocatable :: si(:) integer, allocatable :: ssi

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 19 18:43:49 2017 New Revision: 245581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245581=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-02-19 Andre Vehreschild <

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 19 18:18:33 2017 New Revision: 245579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245579=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-19 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/78672] Gfortran test suite failures with a sanitized compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672 Bug 78672 depends on bug 78958, which changed state. Bug 78958 Summary: Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 15:43:03 2017 New Revision: 245194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245194=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #7 from

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 13:05:10 2017 New Revision: 245193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245193=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 12:42:31 2017 New Revision: 245192 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245192=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #27 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting on week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #26 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 12:02:15 2017 New Revision: 245191 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245191=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild <

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #6 from

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #25 from

[Bug fortran/78672] Gfortran test suite failures with a sanitized compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672 Bug 78672 depends on bug 68887, which changed state. Bug 68887 Summary: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 What

[Bug fortran/68887] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/70697] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT WAIT with array element UNTIL_COUNT argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70697 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/68887] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 Bug 68887 depends on bug 70696, which changed state. Bug 70696 Summary: [Coarray] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE coarray https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/70696] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Gfortran is a P4 project. Higher than P4 is not possible.

[Bug fortran/78640] [F2015] gfortran accepts invalid allocatable polymorphic result in pure function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78640 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC

[Bug fortran/78958] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_5.f03 - Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Assignee

  1   2   3   4   5   >