Re: [ARM] Is TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM still needed?

2014-07-23 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 22/07/14 16:23, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 22/07/14 14:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, In the arm backend we've got this TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM macro that is currently on for TARGET_THUMB2 with a comment that says: /* We could use unified syntax for arm mode, but for now we just use

Re: [ARM] Is TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM still needed?

2014-07-23 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 23/07/14 09:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 22/07/14 16:23, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 22/07/14 14:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, In the arm backend we've got this TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM macro that is currently on for TARGET_THUMB2 with a comment that says: /* We could use unified

Re: [ARM] Is TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM still needed?

2014-07-23 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 23/07/14 09:59, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 23/07/14 09:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 22/07/14 16:23, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 22/07/14 14:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, In the arm backend we've got this TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM macro that is currently on for TARGET_THUMB2 with a

[ARM] Is TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM still needed?

2014-07-22 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi all, In the arm backend we've got this TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM macro that is currently on for TARGET_THUMB2 with a comment that says: /* We could use unified syntax for arm mode, but for now we just use it for Thumb-2. */ I've been doing some work converting the pre-UAL floating point

Re: [ARM] Is TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM still needed?

2014-07-22 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 22/07/14 14:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, In the arm backend we've got this TARGET_UNIFIED_ASM macro that is currently on for TARGET_THUMB2 with a comment that says: /* We could use unified syntax for arm mode, but for now we just use it for Thumb-2. */ I've been doing some work