On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
If you want to make a patch, and Gerald approves it, it's fine by me.
But, fwprop is described as a new feature (faster compiler, better
code), and the build system affects people building the compiler. The
change we're talking about seems to affect
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 12:51 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
Comments?
OK for Stage1?
I do have another issue with these set of patches which I did not notice
until today.
I can no longer do inside a just built GCC do:
What are the contents of t.c? What if you set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX?
t.c:
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
printf(Hello World\n);
return 0;
}
--
No I did not set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX as I did not know I have to set that now.
Seems like a change like this should be mentioned on
Andrew Pinski wrote:
What are the contents of t.c? What if you set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX?
t.c:
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
printf(Hello World\n);
return 0;
}
--
No I did not set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX as I did not know I have to set that now.
Seems like a change
Andrew Pinski wrote:
But other non user-visible changes are mentioned on changes.html already.
Forward prop in 4.3.
Incompatible changes to the build system in 4.2 which seems very related to
stuff like
this.
If you want to make a patch, and Gerald approves it, it's fine by me.
But, fwprop
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 12:51 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
Comments?
OK for Stage1?
I do have another issue with these set of patches which I did not notice
until today.
I can no longer do inside a just built GCC do:
./cc1 t.c
or
./xgcc -B. t.c
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 03:32:27PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
I agree.
I can't approve your patches, though.
This patch is OK, once we reach Stage 1.
Checked into
Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
I agree.
I can't approve your patches, though.
Ian
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
I agree.
I can't approve your patches, though.
This patch is OK, once we reach Stage 1.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
