Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:54, Tejas Belagod wrote:
I'd like to follow up this thread to move towards removing arm_neon.h's
dependence on stdint.h. My comments inline below.
As far as I can tell, the only dependency arm_neon.h has on the
contents of that header are the [u]int[8|
On 18/07/13 17:22, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 18 July 2013 16:54, Tejas Belagod wrote:
>> I'd like to follow up this thread to move towards removing arm_neon.h's
>> dependence on stdint.h. My comments inline below.
>>
>>> As far as I can tell, the only dependency arm_neon.h has on the
>>> contents
On 18 July 2013 16:54, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> I'd like to follow up this thread to move towards removing arm_neon.h's
> dependence on stdint.h. My comments inline below.
>
>> As far as I can tell, the only dependency arm_neon.h has on the
>> contents of that header are the [u]int[8|16|32|64]_t typ
Hi Ard,
I'd like to follow up this thread to move towards removing arm_neon.h's
dependence on stdint.h. My comments inline below.
From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:32 AM
Subject: ARM/AAarch64: NEON intrinsics in the kernel
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Christophe Lyon
On 21 May 2013 18:22, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> I am currently exploring various ways of using NEON instructions in
>> kernel mode. One of the ways of doing so is using NEON intrinsics,
>> which we would like to support in the kernel, but unfortunatel
On Tue, 21 May 2013, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> I am currently exploring various ways of using NEON instructions in
> kernel mode. One of the ways of doing so is using NEON intrinsics,
> which we would like to support in the kernel, but unfortunately, at
> the moment we can't because the support head
On 21 May 2013 11:43, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Why don't you add a (maybe cut-down) stdint.h to the kernel. It seems
> bizarre to me that the kernel is trying to provide standard types through a
> non-standard interface.
>
There have been heated debates going on for years about these things.
Q
On 21/05/13 10:32, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Hello all,
I am currently exploring various ways of using NEON instructions in
kernel mode. One of the ways of doing so is using NEON intrinsics,
which we would like to support in the kernel, but unfortunately, at
the moment we can't because the support h
Hello all,
I am currently exploring various ways of using NEON instructions in
kernel mode. One of the ways of doing so is using NEON intrinsics,
which we would like to support in the kernel, but unfortunately, at
the moment we can't because the support header arm_neon.h assumes C99
conformance an
