"Paul Zimmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the second line, gcc will reuse the same address register, and
> generate an indirect 32-bit load with an offset of -5 to fetch the
> value of 'testme.a'. But on our custom processor, the offsets of
> indirect load instructions are scaled by the s
Hi,
I have a problem while porting gcc to a custom processor. Here is a
simplified example:
struct big_struct {
...
int a;
char b;
char c;
...
} testme;
char char_tmp;
int int_tmp;
int testit(void)
{
char_tmp = testme.c;
int_tmp = testme.a
