On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
>> May I forward your message to the CCC++ CWG?
>
> Certainly, it is a public message, as are all the previous discussions it
> references. I have not tried to engage with the C++ committee dire
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> May I forward your message to the CCC++ CWG?
Certainly, it is a public message, as are all the previous discussions it
references. I have not tried to engage with the C++ committee directly
since I am not a C++ expert and keeping up with C developm
May I forward your message to the CCC++ CWG?
-- Gaby
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > (Not that I am impressed with the incompatibilities of C++0x attributes
> > with existing practice or their ignoring all the hard issues with
> > attributes that have actually come up in GCC implementation experience -
> > along with the proposals ha
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is it possible to allow C++ constant expressions (currently static const,
>> and C++0x constexpr in the future) to be used as __attribute__ parameters
>> in the upcomming version of
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to allow C++ constant expressions (currently static const,
> and C++0x constexpr in the future) to be used as __attribute__ parameters
> in the upcomming version of GCC? In my code I have the following construction:
What does
H.J. Lu wrote:
> You can use __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ for that purpose.
Yes, _for that purpose_ it works perfectly. However, I would
also like be able to align fields to cache line size. I have a set
of C++ template cache geometry descriptors which provide
a constant by the name of line_size:
names
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to allow C++ constant expressions (currently static const,
> and C++0x constexpr in the future) to be used as __attribute__ parameters
> in the upcomming version of GCC? In my code I have the following construction:
Hello,
Is it possible to allow C++ constant expressions (currently static const,
and C++0x constexpr in the future) to be used as __attribute__ parameters
in the upcomming version of GCC? In my code I have the following construction:
namespace simd {
static const std::size_t vector_si
