--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 03:44
---
This works for me and many other people. Also no feedback in 3 months so
closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Jim Wilson schrieb:
Rainer Emrich wrote:
/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/ld:
unrecognized
option '-Wl,-rpath'
This looks like PR 21206. See my explanation at the end. I see this on
some of our FreeBSD machines, but I've never seen it on an IA-64 linux
I ran the testsuite for an xtensa-elf target and it looks OK:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01243.html
There are a few failures but they are not regressions.
--Bob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Wilson schrieb:
Rainer Emrich wrote:
/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/ld:
unrecognized
option '-Wl,-rpath'
This looks like PR 21206. See my explanation at the end. I see this on
some of our FreeBSD machines,
output of config.guess
$ gcc-4.1.0-20060219/config.guess
i686-pc-mingw32
$ arm-elf-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-elf
Configured with: ../../gcc-4.1.0-20060219/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++ --with-cpu=arm7tdmi --enable-interwork
--enable-multilib --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.0 RC1 is here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.0-20060219
Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging, and other
similar issues.
If you find problems, please do not send me
On Feb 21, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Grigory Zagorodnev wrote:
Hi!
My spec cpu2000 run shows 252.eon miscompared with i686-redhat-linux
4.1.0 20060221 (prerelease) compiler. Optimization level is -O2. Spec
reported miscompare of pixels_out.kajiya.
Has anybody seen this before?
Yes this is PR 323,
Hi!
My spec cpu2000 run shows 252.eon miscompared with i686-redhat-linux
4.1.0 20060221 (prerelease) compiler. Optimization level is -O2. Spec
reported miscompare of pixels_out.kajiya.
Has anybody seen this before?
You should use -ffast-math for eon.
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:09:43PM +0300, Grigory Zagorodnev wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.0 RC1 is here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.0-20060219
Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging
Rainer Emrich wrote:
/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/ld: unrecognized
option '-Wl,-rpath'
This looks like PR 21206. See my explanation at the end. I see this on
some of our FreeBSD machines, but I've never seen it on an IA-64 linux
machine.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging, and other
similar issues.
Here it looks good so far on i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01036.html
Regards
Greg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bootstrap failure in libjava on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Failure in building jv-convert:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=link
/disk1/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.0-RC1/gcc-4.1.0-RC1/gcc/gcj
- -B/disk1/SCRATCH/gcc-build
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 19:40 +1100, Greg Schafer wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging, and other
similar issues.
Here it looks good so far on i686-pc-linux-gnu
On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
one libstdc++ amd64 FAIL:
FAIL: abi_check
That is because you did not supply --enable-__cxa_atexit
to configure. This has been mentioned so many times it
might as well enabled it by default for GNU/Linux.
-- Pinski
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.0 RC1 is here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.0-20060219
Looking fine on s390-ibm-linux and s390x-ibm-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01094.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01095.html
except for the recently
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 18:34 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
one libstdc++ amd64 FAIL:
FAIL: abi_check
That is because you did not supply --enable-__cxa_atexit
to configure. This has been mentioned so many times it
might as well enabled
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01095.html
FAIL: cc1010b
Artifact or real failure?
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21.02.2006 01:10:58:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01095.html
FAIL: cc1010b
Artifact or real failure?
One of the usual artifacts ...
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU
One of the usual artifacts ...
Thanks. I've personally got them on Linux only, never ever on Solaris.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:45:15AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
except for the recently introduced test case
FAIL: gcc.dg/20060218-1.c (test for errors, line 6)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20060218-1.c (test for excess errors)
This one should be already fixed on gcc-4_1-branch (after RC1
was released I
gcc 4.1.0 rc1 failes to bootstrap on my amd64 gentoo-box; the last release
gcc-4.1.0-20060217 bootstraps fine so it seems to be rc1 and not my gentoo
setup.
../gcc-4.1.0-20060219/configure --prefix=/home/xtv --program-prefix=x
--program-suffix=41rc1 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran
--- Comment #1 from themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2006-02-20 09:19
---
GCC here is expecting ld to be located at /home/xtv/bin/xld
Try adding --with-ld=/path/to/ld and --with-as=/path/to/as to configury
See if this makes any difference
--
--- Comment #2 from xtv at tveith dot homelinux dot com 2006-02-20 09:52
---
(In reply to comment #1)
GCC here is expecting ld to be located at /home/xtv/bin/xld
Try adding --with-ld=/path/to/ld and --with-as=/path/to/as to configury
See if this makes any difference
The
--- Comment #3 from xtv at tveith dot homelinux dot com 2006-02-20 12:33
---
Without --program-prefix it bootstraps fine. So it seems to be a problem with
the configure-machinery.
Shall I close this bug and open a new one regarding configure?
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 13:06 ---
If this worked with 20060217 and does not with the RC1, this actually does
not make sense as there have been no configuring changes made between that
time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26377
--- Comment #5 from themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2006-02-20 13:12
---
--program-prefix works fine on i686-pc-linux with GCC 4.1.0 RC 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26377
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 19:54 ---
I just tried to reproduce this with exactly the options you used and I could
not. I then tried with a different prefix of /home/pinskia (my home directory)
and it still worked.
Is there something special with your
--- Comment #7 from xtv at tveith dot homelinux dot com 2006-02-20 20:24
---
Hi..
whenever I use --program-prefix, bootstrap fails / otherwise it works just
perfect. To illustrate, this time i used the following configure:
../gcc-4.1.0-20060219/configure --prefix=/home/xtv
--- Comment #8 from themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2006-02-20 20:57
---
Do you have any of the following variables set before building GCC:
LD
DEFAULT_LINKER
ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_TARGET
CONFIG_SITE
?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26377
--- Comment #9 from xtv at tveith dot homelinux dot com 2006-02-20 21:05
---
(In reply to comment #8)
Do you have any of the following variables set before building GCC:
LD
DEFAULT_LINKER
ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_TARGET
CONFIG_SITE
No:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gcc/out $ echo $LD
[EMAIL
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 02:19
---
(In reply to comment #9)
autoconf-2.59
automake-1.9.6
binutils-2.16.1
Maybe thats the reason..
I doubt it. Maybe you have a messed up coreutils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26377
31 matches
Mail list logo
