Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-24 Thread Jie Zhang
Jie Zhang wrote: On 8/10/07, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2 that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments re. timing for Stage 3? I have many bfin port patches which have not been merged into

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-17 Thread Olga Golovanevsky
Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2007 17:19:13: Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2 that they are having trouble getting reviewed? struct-reorg + ipa-type-escape changes are awaiting for response.

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-15 Thread Jan Hubicka
Jan Hubicka wrote: One thing I would like to see in is the sharing checker. The criteria of bootstrap/regtesting on primary platforms is almost met now with exception of regmove pass that I sent patch for some time ago. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01441.html I will

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-14 Thread Jan Hubicka
Summary --- We entered Stage 2 on July 6th. I plan to put us into Stage 3 on September 10th. At that point, we will accept only bug-fixes -- no more new features until Stage 1 for GCC 4.4. Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2 that they are

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-14 Thread Mark Mitchell
Jan Hubicka wrote: One thing I would like to see in is the sharing checker. The criteria of bootstrap/regtesting on primary platforms is almost met now with exception of regmove pass that I sent patch for some time ago. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01441.html I will do

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-13 Thread Joern Rennecke
We have a lot of patches to the ARC port, but I suppose that would not really be a problem for phase three, as the current arc port in the gcc mainline is not really useful for end users - it doesn't support any of the cores that have been released in recent years. Some patches belong logically

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-12 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2 that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments re. timing for Stage 3? Zadeck has the parloop branch patches, which I've been reviewing. I am not sure how many other patches are left, but at

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-10 Thread Diego Novillo
On 8/10/07 9:49 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: Zadeck has the parloop branch patches [ ... ] Sorry, I meant Zdenek.

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-10 Thread Diego Novillo
On 8/9/07 6:19 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote: Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2 that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments re. timing for Stage 3? Zadeck has the parloop branch patches, which I've been reviewing. I am not sure how many other

GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)

2007-08-09 Thread Mark Mitchell
Summary --- We entered Stage 2 on July 6th. I plan to put us into Stage 3 on September 10th. At that point, we will accept only bug-fixes -- no more new features until Stage 1 for GCC 4.4. Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2 that they are having trouble