On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems odd that cfgrtl allows a conditional trap inside a basic block,
but not an unconditional trap. The way things are now, it means we need
to fix up the basic blocks
This testcase extracted from libgcc2.c
int
sub (int i)
{
if (i == 0)
return 1 / i;
return i + 2;
}
compiled with -minline-int-divide-min-latency for IA-64 generates an
ICE.
tmp2.c:8: error: flow control insn inside a basic block
(insn 18 17 19 3 tmp2.c:5 (trap_if (const_int 1 [0x1])
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems odd that cfgrtl allows a conditional trap inside a basic block,
but not an unconditional trap. The way things are now, it means we need
to fix up the basic blocks after running combine or any other pass that
might be able to simplify a
