Re: Inconsistent error/pedwarn: ISO C++

2007-09-30 Thread Mark Mitchell
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: On 20/09/2007, Doug Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We can't seem to decide whether ISO C++ really forbids comparisons between pointers and integers or not. The first two are for == and !=, the second two are for , , =, =. Why the inconsistency? typeck.c:

Re: Inconsistent error/pedwarn: ISO C++

2007-09-24 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 20/09/2007, Doug Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We can't seem to decide whether ISO C++ really forbids comparisons between pointers and integers or not. The first two are for == and !=, the second two are for , , =, =. Why the inconsistency? typeck.c: error (ISO C++ forbids

Inconsistent error/pedwarn: ISO C++

2007-09-20 Thread Doug Gregor
We can't seem to decide whether ISO C++ really forbids comparisons between pointers and integers or not. The first two are for == and !=, the second two are for , , =, =. Why the inconsistency? typeck.c: error (ISO C++ forbids comparison between pointer and integer); typeck.c: