Sjodin, Jan wrote:
I agree. Also, the LTO requirements and high-level design document
states that the external format should be compiler-independent and it
should be possible for other tools to read and write that format. Is
this still a goal?
It was a goal for me, but I don't think other
On 5/2/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. It seems like LTO will have to wait for
the tuples or there will be a lot of throw-away code.
If you really only can think of LTO as the reader/writer, then perhaps
yes. But if you read back this thread, you would
: Diego Novillo; Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On 5/2/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. It seems like LTO will have to wait
for
the tuples or there will be a lot of throw-away code.
If you really only
On 5/2/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. It seems like LTO will have to wait for
the tuples or there will be a lot of throw-away code.
If you really only can think of LTO as the reader/writer, then perhaps
yes. But if you read back this thread, you
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 4:09 PM
To: Sjodin, Jan
Cc: Diego Novillo; Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can
Hi I am new to GCC development and I have a few questions about LTO.
What has been done since the last status report in January? I would
also like to know what is most important to work on right now to make
progress on LTO (e.g. type system, intermediate representation,
reader/writer). What
Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi I am new to GCC development and I have a few questions about LTO.
What has been done since the last status report in January? I would
also like to know what is most important to work on right now to make
progress on LTO (e.g. type system,
On May 1, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi I am new to GCC development and I have a few questions about LTO.
What has been done since the last status report in January? I would
also like to know what is most important to work on right now to
represented
in
the IR.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:43 AM
To: Sjodin, Jan
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO My take on it. Others may feel
differently.
Some langhooks have been removed
Sjodin, Jan wrote on 05/01/07 13:54:
Does LTO have any hard dependencies on the gimple-tuples? I imagine the
on-disk representation could be separate from any internal
representation. I am curious if the two efforts can be worked on in
parallel and how well they can be separated, since the
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Diego Novillo wrote:
Some amount of parallelism may occur, but we will have to adapt many LTO
chunks when the tuple work goes in mainline. The data structures for
the IL will be completely different, after all.
Also, LTO hasn't been merged from mainline in a long time;
-Original Message-
From: Joseph S. Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:07 PM
To: Diego Novillo
Cc: Sjodin, Jan; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: Also, LTO hasn't been merged
On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how many people that are currently working on the
tuple representation and can perhaps guess how many months it would take to
get into mainline?
Aldy is working full time on it, atm. Richard, Andrew and I may start
working on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Diego Novillo
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:26 PM
To: Sjodin, Jan
Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone give similar information about LTO? How many people
(full/part time) and how long time it will take? How much work is LTO
compared to the tuple representation?
A vast amount more if we're going to work on LTO with the current
GIMPLE
15 matches
Mail list logo
