On Sunday 21 April 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
-std=c++1y?
Alternatively we could
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 21 April 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Piotr Wyderski
piotr.wyder...@gmail.com wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
C++03 was essentially bug fixes to C++98 so we did not make the
distinction.
C++14 is more than bug fixes to C++11, it contains many new extensions.
So I am unsure the situations are
Hi,
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net ha scritto:
There appear to be two targets: C++14 and C++17. Personally, I am
inclined
to have CXX14 and CXX1Y, where CXX1Y is for the presumed C++17 target.
This clarified - thanks - I'm wondering if it's safe to assume that the C++14
Hi again,
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com ha scritto:
Hi,
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net ha scritto:
There appear to be two targets: C++14 and C++17. Personally, I am
inclined
to have CXX14 and CXX1Y, where CXX1Y is for the presumed C++17 target.
This clarified -
On 23 April 2013 15:29, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net ha scritto:
There appear to be two targets: C++14 and C++17. Personally, I am
inclined
to have CXX14 and CXX1Y, where CXX1Y is for the presumed C++17 target.
This clarified - thanks - I'm
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com ha scritto:
But remember we no longer use __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ anyway, we
check __cplusplus = 201103L, and so within those chunks we could
additionally check for some C++14 macro.
Right, forgot that. Great. The = check we have got now makes
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net ha scritto:
There appear to be two targets: C++14 and C++17. Personally, I am
inclined
to have CXX14 and CXX1Y, where CXX1Y is for the presumed C++17 target.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
But remember we no longer use __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ anyway,
yes, this was a great move; kudos to whoever did it.
we
check __cplusplus = 201103L, and so within those chunks we could
additionally check for some
On 23 April 2013 15:54, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com
wrote:
But remember we no longer use __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ anyway,
yes, this was a great move; kudos to whoever did it.
That was Jason, when he changed the front end
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
-std=c++1y?
Alternatively we could set the value of __cplusplus to 201400L but I'm
not
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com ha scritto:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
-std=c++1y?
Humm, I'm still
On 21 April 2013 18:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com ha scritto:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com ha scritto:
We did, but at the time I was under the incorrect belief that C++14
would be a TC like C++03. Dietmar and Alisdair both corrected me by
pointing out it's going to be a new International Standard, not just a
bugfix update to C++11.
Looks
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Paolo Carlini
paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com ha scritto:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2013 18:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com ha scritto:
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what
17 matches
Mail list logo
