Hi!
Sorry about the (possibly off) question: would this apply also to
GMP/MPFR, if not, wouldn't it make sense?
Philippe
François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is a first draft of a patch to add a -fstatic-libgfortran
option. This new option is recognized by the driver and
Philippe Schaffnit wrote:
Sorry about the (possibly off) question: would this apply also to
GMP/MPFR, if not, wouldn't it make sense?
It wouldn't make sense -- GMP and MPFR are never linked into the
compiled output at all. (They're only used within the compiler itself,
for processing
Oops! Thanks a lot for your reply.
Philippe
Brooks Moses wrote:
Philippe Schaffnit wrote:
Sorry about the (possibly off) question: would this apply also to
GMP/MPFR, if not, wouldn't it make sense?
It wouldn't make sense -- GMP and MPFR are never linked into the
compiled output at
Sorry about the (possibly off) question: would this apply also to
GMP/MPFR, if not, wouldn't it make sense?
GMP and MPFR are host libraries, so it is actually an independent
issue. However, it might be worth having --with-static-gmp and
--with-static-mpfr to request static linking of these
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:55:56AM +0200, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
Sorry about the (possibly off) question: would this apply also to
GMP/MPFR, if not, wouldn't it make sense?
GMP and MPFR are host libraries, so it is actually an independent
issue. However, it might be worth having
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Fran?ois-Xavier Coudert wrote:
Attached is a first draft of a patch to add a -fstatic-libgfortran
option. This new option is recognized by the driver and instead of
I think -static-libgfortran (no initial f) would be a better spelling,
for consistency with -static-libgcc.
